Intel Xeon 7 ‘Diamond Rapids’ CPUs officially launching in 2027 on Intel 18A-P — next-gen P-core Xeon features PCIe 6.0, 50% higher core counts, and twice the memory bandwidth

Intel Xeon 7 ‘Diamond Rapids’
(Image credit: Intel)

Intel has confirmed several details about its next-generation Xeon 7 CPUs, codenamed Diamond Rapids, which are now officially slated to launch in 2027. Announcing its E-core-only Xeon 6+ chips at Computex, Intel teased that Diamond Rapids will support PCIe 6.0, pack 50% more cores than Xeon 6, and double the memory bandwidth. Intel is building Diamond Rapids chips on the Intel 18A-P node, which is a refined version of 18A that Intel demoed just last month.

Although Intel never formally announced a release window for Xeon 7, we originally expected to see the chips this year – a timeframe that became increasingly unlikely as news about Diamond Rapids dried up. Now, Intel has officially confirmed Diamond Rapids is arriving next year, meaning AMD will have a head start with its next-gen EPYC Venice CPUs built on the Zen 6 architecture, which are still (at the moment) slated for release this year.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jake Roach
Senior Analyst, CPUs

Jake Roach is the Senior CPU Analyst at Tom’s Hardware, writing reviews, news, and features about the latest consumer and workstation processors.

  • JayNor
    Intel has avx10.2 and APX extension on the roadmap for Diamond Rapids. Those reportedly won't be on the coming generation of AMD chips.
    Reply
  • setx
    AVX10.2 is insignificant on server as it already has AVX512. It will be significant on client chips as Intel will finally have parity with AMD.

    APX is very interesting but we probably shouldn't expect too much from first implementation.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    setx said:
    AVX10.2 is insignificant on server as it already has AVX512.
    The list of new instructions in AVX10.2 is on page 35 (Section 3.1.4) of this doc:
    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/content-details/828965/intel-advanced-vector-extensions-10-2-intel-avx10-2-architecture-specification.html
    Aside from fp8 support, they do sound mostly like fairly minor tweaks.

    setx said:
    APX is very interesting but we probably shouldn't expect too much from first implementation.
    I disagree. I think the main benefits will be immediately available, since most of the ISA's new features should map onto existing backend functionality. The benefits won't be huge, but if compiling for it delivers ~10% IPC increase, that's roughly equivalent to a typical generational increase!
    Reply