Intel details 18A-P process node, touts higher performance, lower power, and better thermals — 9% more performance, thermal conductivity improved by 50%

18A
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Intel is ramping up production of its CPUs on its 18A (1.8nm-class) process technology with promising results, but at the same time, the work on its enhanced version called 18A-P is well underway with production readiness looming in the coming quarters. The company's 18A-P introduces two new types of transistors, tighter process variability control, and improved thermals to enable higher performance and lower power consumption. This is perhaps why Apple and other fabless chip designers are rumored to be considering using 18A-P.

When compared to Intel's baseline 18A, 18A-P fabrication process promises to enable chip developers to either increase the performance of their designs by 9% (at the same power) or lower their power consumption by 18% (at the same performance and complexity), according to a paper Intel released at the VLSI 2026 conference. To achieve these improvements, Intel introduced new types of gate-all-around RibbonFET transistors, including high-performance devices with enhanced contacts as well as new low-power devices. Designers can now push higher frequencies on critical paths and reduce power consumption in less demanding regions, which greatly improves overall performance efficiency.

Intel 18A-P new technology features compared to Intel 18A

Intel 18A-P new technology features compared to Intel 18A (Image credit: Intel)

Meanwhile, 18A-P retains contacted poly pitch (50nm) and library heights (180nm and 160nm) of 18A as well as design compatibility with the base process, meaning that a chip originally designed for 18A can be ported to 18A-P and benefit from certain process-level improvements (which do not rely on new transistor types), though to fully realize performance and efficiency gains requires design re-optimization.

Latest Videos From

Performance of new devices(low power and high performance) in 18A-P

Performance of new devices (low power and high performance) in 18A-P (Image credit: Intel)

Another major improvement of 18A-P over 18A is -30% skew corner tightening, which also reduces variability and improves yield efficiency. The enhancement narrows the spread between fast and slow silicon and makes it closer to 'typical' silicon as well as center-to-edge variation across the wafer. Also, the production node adds extra threshold voltage (VT) options (over 5+ pairs of logic VTs compared to 4 pairs in 18A) to enable finer-grained binning and more consistent chip behavior, which increases the proportion of dies that meet target specifications. This improves parametric yield and enables chip designers to get more higher-end silicon from a single wafer. Meanwhile, tightening of process corners does not affect defect density as existing challenges with line-edge roughness (LER) and stochastic variability remain intact.

While Intel's 18A-P retains the contacted pitch of the base node, the company still tweaked the resistance and capacitance of its metal stack, which impacts signal speed, power consumption, and timing. Yet, Intel does not characterize the changes.

Last but not least, 18A-P introduces enhancements in thermals, reliability, and voltage behavior that are critical for an advanced process technology aimed at both client and data center applications. Intel says it improved thermal conductivity by 50%. Lower thermal resistance helps manage higher power densities associated with GAA transistors, which is important for client applications. Improved logic negative-bias temperature instability (NBTI) enhances long-term device stability under high-voltage stress, which is critical for data center processors. Finally, 18A-P better aligns logic and SRAM minimum operating voltage (Vmin) to improve low-voltage operation and stability.

Intel 18A-P demonstrates ~9% iso-power performance gain (at0.75V) over Intel 18A on an industry standard ARM core sub-block

Intel 18A-P demonstrates ~9% iso-power performance gain (at 0.75V) over Intel 18A on an industry standard ARM core sub-block. (Image credit: Intel)

Intel's 18A-P is a heavily optimized version of 18A-P that not only promises higher performance efficiency but also addresses things like parametric yields, thermals, and reliability. Altogether, these enhancements make 18A-P a more mature and attractive version of 18A, not only for Intel, but also for potential external customers like Apple.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • beyondlogic
    Admin said:
    Intel details improvements of 18A-P that include higher performance, lower power, reduced variability, improved yields, and more.

    Intel details 18A-P process node, touts higher performance, lower power, and better thermals — 9% more performance, thermal conductivity improved b... : Read more

    Good if it's true real world will tell.
    Reply
  • garbilkee
    When was the last time Intel actually delivered on something they said they would. Exactly.
    Reply
  • usertests
    new types of gate-all-around RibbonFET transistors
    That's a mouthful.

    It looks nice, especially the efficiency improvement on a design compatible tweaked node.

    This is perhaps why Apple and other fabless chip designers are rumored to be considering using 18A-P.
    Intel makes sharp reversal, is 'going big time into 14A,' says CEO Lip-Bu Tan — 'serve the customer well' remark hints at external client
    I thought the energy was behind pitching 14A for external customers. Maybe the supply desperation is reaching new heights.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    But does this change anything about 18a in regards to YIELD?

    And now what about 14a, is there going to be a 14a+ also, before it's even begin?

    This may be good news, even if it's multiplying work in progress, increasing capex costs, delaying delivery, crushing demand for the unoptimized process, etc.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    They seem to be having a lot of success around this process node. The contract buzz has the valuation sky high right now (record levels). Just about everything reported for their 18A production last year was doom and gloom, now squeaky quiet. Not seeing too much negative coverage on the 14A progress right now. Its either straight to the moon or to hell. Fun to watch.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    usertests said:
    I thought the energy was behind pitching 14A for external customers.
    They don't have enough fab capacity for that. Not since they started delaying the buildout of their new fabs, would they have had enough capacity to ramp it up for a meaningful amount of external business, I think.

    JRStern said:
    But does this change anything about 18a in regards to YIELD?
    Yeah, their statements all seem very carefully worded to highlight positive aspects, but I'm not sure the reality is quite as good as their pitch makes it sound.

    Gururu said:
    Just about everything reported for their 18A production last year was doom and gloom, now squeaky quiet. Not seeing too much negative coverage on the 14A progress right now.
    What I find telling is how they said 14A is yielding better than 18A did, at the same point. But, 18A had a rough ramp, so that's really not saying much.
    Reply
  • Lorguid
    Admin said:
    Intel details improvements of 18A-P that include higher performance, lower power, reduced variability, improved yields, and more.

    Intel details 18A-P process node, touts higher performance, lower power, and better thermals — 9% more performance, thermal conductivity improved b... : Read more
    I imagine that "18A-P is a heavily optimized version of 18A-P" was meant without the "-P" at the second occurrence of the process name.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    This mostly looks like exactly what one would expect from a node revision.

    I think the most notable thing here is the work on parametric yield as this is something rather important for outside customers and less so for Intel. Historically Intel has used one die for the majority of the SKUs in any given segment so significantly cutting down a chip isn't as important (for example: RPL and ARL 8/16 die were cut all the way down to 6/4).

    As for the yields conversation they improve over time or nodes get completely abandoned (see Samsung 3nm) and since there's no sign of the latter it's a safe bet the former is happening (albeit at a slower rate than they'd like). A node revision by itself isn't going to improve yields unless there's a specific change intended for that exact reason which there doesn't appear to be here.
    Reply
  • usertests
    thestryker said:
    This mostly looks like exactly what one would expect from a node revision.
    IMO the 18% efficiency improvement at same performance is better than a typical node revision. And I find this part important:
    To achieve these improvements, Intel introduced new types of gate-all-around RibbonFET transistors, including high-performance devices with enhanced contacts as well as new low-power devices. Designers can now push higher frequencies on critical paths and reduce power consumption in less demanding regions, which greatly improves overall performance efficiency.
    It reminds me of TSMC's FinFlex. Good to have, great for some of Intel's own heterogeneous processors.

    Does anyone know the current relationship between 18A, 18A-P, and backside power delivery? I thought it was optional and not playing a role with any of the stated improvements here.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    usertests said:
    IMO the 18% efficiency improvement at same performance is better than a typical node revision.
    Depends on what you're looking at since if I'm remembering correctly that's what Intel 4 to Intel 3 was. Keep in mind that 18A has more limited voltage than prior nodes which is also a place being improved. This is not to say 18% is anything to scoff at just that it's not an anomaly.
    usertests said:
    Does anyone know the current relationship between 18A, 18A-P, and backside power delivery? I thought it was optional and not playing a role with any of the stated improvements here.
    While it's supposed to be optional I think it's safe to say Intel is always going to be putting their best foot forward and unless stated it's included. I haven't heard of another iteration of PowerVia yet. Hopefully next month when VLSI happens more details will be publicly released.
    Reply