Be Quiet Light Base 600 LX Case Review: Innovative design, lackluster thermal performance

Can be configured in three different layouts, and includes two pre-installed PWM/ARGB hubs

Be Quiet Light Base 600 LX Case
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Noise Levels

Be Quiet Light Base 600 LX Case

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

True to the company name, Be Quiet’s Light Base 600 LX very noisy even at maximum fan speeds – at least not compared to other cases on the market. The maximum noise level is only 41.9 dBA, which is significantly quieter than most other cases I’ve tested.

Remember, the impact of noise levels is logarithmic, so depending on your sensitivity, a few dBA of difference can make a major difference.

Maximum Thermal Load – CPU Results

For this first test, I removed power limits from the Intel i9-14900K CPU and ran Cinebench R23 while also running Furmark 2 on the Radeon RX 7900 GRE GPU. This causes total system power consumption to reach around 600W.

This should be considered a “maximum performance” or “worst-case” scenario.

Be Quiet Light Base 600 LX Case

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

During this test, where both the GPU and CPU are pumping heat into the case, the CPU consumed an average of 245.6 Watts. I was a little disappointed with this result. While it isn’t the worst in terms of maximum cooling performance, it’s near the bottom of our charts.

Maximum Thermal Load – GPU Temperature Results

Be Quiet Light Base 600 LX Case

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

There’s no way to sugarcoat the poor showing of GPU thermal results here. While they’re certainly acceptable temperatures, and won’t cause throttling in real-world performance, our GPU ran hotter than any other pre-configured case that I’ve tested.

Maximum Thermal Load – Noise Normalized

For this next test, I’ve set the system fans to run at 40.3 dBA on cases with PWM control. I’ve also normalized the output of Akasa’s Soho H4 Plus cooler, setting it to 76% - 40.9 dBA from one meter away.

You can consider this a measure of the case’s efficiency when set to low noise levels. Usually this is an area that Be Quiet’s products excel in. However, these results were also disappointing – the second-worst I’ve recorded yet.

Be Quiet Light Base 600 LX Case

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Intense Gaming Thermal Load

Lastly, I tested the cooling with a moderately intensive gaming workload. I set the Intel i9-14900K CPU’s power consumption to 150W while running a full load on a Radeon RX 7900GRE GPU, which consumes approximately 276W. This is similar to the peak power consumption that I’ve experienced with these components when playing Ubisoft’s Far Cry V – so this test should be slightly more stressful than what you’d actually see while playing that game.

Be Quiet Light Base 600 LX Case

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

GPU temperatures were again at the bottom of our chart here, reaching 67 degrees Celsius after ten minutes. The CPU’s temperatures weren’t quite as bad, but they were still unimpressive – especially when you consider the system fans are noise normalized, so the competitors I’ve tested this case against don’t have an advantage from running at louder noise levels.

Be Quiet Light Base 600 LX Case

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Conclusion

Be Quiet Light Base 600 LX Case

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

I wanted to like Be Quiet’s Light Base 600, as it has a genuinely nice aesthetic design paired with the somewhat unique feature of having three different layout options. However, the thermal performance of this case wasn’t impressive – actually amongst the worst I’ve tested so far – and I find that hard to accept from a case that typically costs $184. However, the build quality is superb and the case really does have a nice look to it – so this case might be of interest to you if you’re not overclocking and just want a good-looking, high-quality customizable home for your components.

MORE: Best PC Cases

MORE: Best Mini-ITX Cases

Albert Thomas
Freelancer, CPU Cooling Reviewer

Albert Thomas is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering CPU cooling reviews.

  • Neilbob
    I hope Be Quiet are going to be reprimanded for raiding their local aquarium.
    Reply
  • sailorjeff
    I have the Light Base 900. The cooling options are much better and it offers excellent thermal characteristics. There are some issues with the case though. Again, the filters are a pain to clean. I ended up removing them. Most of the screws holding the glass panels on stripped out and I had to drill and re-tap with bigger screws. Wires going from front panel to the motherboard go across and block airflow from the side panel where I have my GPU AIO exhaust. The biggest issue is the plastic feet that you can reposition from side to side to re-orient the case break off very easily due to a bad design. When I contacted Be Quiet regarding this issue they gave me a hard time when I tried to get replacement parts. For a part that probably cost maybe 5 cents at most to make, they wanted me to pay to return the case for a complete replacement. After I spent so much time configuring the case with my hardware this was not going to happen. They never would replace the broken feet (2 of them). I had a friend 3D print me some replacement parts that were much better. For such an expensive case Be Quiet should offer better support. Good case overall except for a few design flaws and horrible customer service.
    Reply
  • thisisaname
    A pretty case with poor thermals is still a bad case :(
    Reply
  • Dr3ams
    I have their Dark Base 900 with no windows...I'm pretty sure no one wants to see my cable management. 👀

    Plus, those flickering lights are a seizure waiting to happen.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    sailorjeff said:
    I have the Light Base 900. The cooling options are much better and it offers excellent thermal characteristics.
    I've got this one tested, but before I make any judgements I think I need to test a few more cases. Reason: They sent the version without fans, and I've only just begun to test cases with a standardized fan setup. That said, it seems to be alright. https://i.imgur.com/V3JbNTe.png
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    thisisaname said:
    A pretty case with poor thermals is still a bad case :(
    I don't know if I can agree with that. It's not going to make a lick of difference for the vast majority of consumers. You might say "But Albert, look at your data!"

    I'll reply: If you're overclocking and/or running full-strength loads on your CPU AND GPU all day - sure, I suppose that might matter a tiny bit more. But really - for most folks I recommend ignoring thermal results and simply getting a case that runs quietly and has support for the features you need.

    It doesn't really matter unless you are overclocking or are absolutely anal about needing the best potential possible temperatures.
    Reply
  • YSCCC
    I think for these type of fish tank cases it will always be better for water cooling rather than air cooling, as the intake fans need to let the intake air to hit the glass and turn around, which is almost always worse than traditional front intake. It may work well if get the bottom intake fans as well and make it very positive pressure will actually improve a lot
    Reply
  • thisisaname
    Albert.Thomas said:
    I don't know if I can agree with that. It's not going to make a lick of difference for the vast majority of consumers. You might say "But Albert, look at your data!"

    I'll reply: If you're overclocking and/or running full-strength loads on your CPU AND GPU all day - sure, I suppose that might matter a tiny bit more. But really - for most folks I recommend ignoring thermal results and simply getting a case that runs quietly and has support for the features you need.

    It doesn't really matter unless you are overclocking or are absolutely anal about needing the best potential possible temperatures.
    From your own words:
    However, the thermal performance of this case wasn’t impressive – actually amongst the worst I’ve tested so far – and I find that hard to accept from a case that typically costs $184.

    Are the thermal comprised to keep the noise down or it is due to something else?
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    thisisaname said:
    From your own words:
    My biggest struggle with these sort of products is that I have to walk a fine line between what I would want in a case, and what another might want in a case - and recognizing that what I might prefer might not be the same as what another would want.

    thisisaname said:
    Are the thermal comprised to keep the noise down or it is due to something else?
    I would assume that the main reason is because this design has a lot of air leakage.
    Reply