Razer Kiyo V2 Review: USB-C required

Like, actually required.

Razer Kiyo V2
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Kiyo V2 is a solid 4K webcam with great auto exposure and white balance and a built-in physical privacy shutter. But it's larger and pickier than similarly priced alternatives.

Pros

  • +

    4K but not $300

  • +

    Great auto color/light balance

  • +

    Built-in privacy shutter

Cons

  • -

    Still pretty big

  • -

    Stand is not detachable

  • -

    Must use included cable

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Too many of today's best webcams are 4K webcams these days, but at least that means they're starting to get more affordable. At $150, Razer's new Kiyo V2 isn't necessarily a steal, but it's half the price of the $300 Kiyo Ultra Pro. And, since you (probably) don't actually need a 4K webcam in the first place, this might just be the perfect price point for the average person seeking 4K image quality.

The Kiyo V2 captures video at 4K / 30fps, 1440p / 30 fps, and at 1080p 60/30/24 fps. It features an 8.3MP Sony STARVIS sensor with a 93-degree field of view, auto and manual focus, and a focal length of 3.0mm. It also has HDR (at 30 fps), 4x zoom, built-in omnidirectional stereo microphones, and a built-in monitor mount with a tripod attachment point on the bottom. At $149.99, it's cheaper than a lot of 4K webcams, and it comes in three colors: black, white, and quartz (pink).

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Sarah Jacobsson Purewal
Senior Editor, Peripherals

Sarah Jacobsson Purewal is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware covering peripherals, software, and custom builds. You can find more of her work in PCWorld, Macworld, TechHive, CNET, Gizmodo, Tom's Guide, PC Gamer, Men's Health, Men's Fitness, SHAPE, Cosmopolitan, and just about everywhere else.

  • hushnecampus
    Are we saying it's not a standard USB C cable, and that an USB A adapter also wouldn't work (using a high enough bandwidth USB A port)? That does seem odd if so.
    Reply