Benchmark Results: StarCraft 2
StarCraft 2 is a benchmark we want to run because it’s very CPU-intensive, and we’d like to see if Llano’s superior graphics capabilities can trump Sandy Bridge’s superior CPU performance:
At 1280x800, the A8-3500M and Core i5-2520M are very close to each other, although the Intel CPU has a higher minimum frame rate, while AMD has a higher average. As you increase the resolution, though, AMD’s APU gains an advantage over Intel.
The discrete Radeon HD 6630M blows everything else away. Dual Graphics shows no benefit in this DirectX 9 title, once again demonstrating a lower frame rate than the discrete card.
Current page: Benchmark Results: StarCraft 2Prev Page Benchmark Results: Crysis 2 Next Page Benchmark Results: Metro 2033
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
HO ! GOD FINALLY I am the first to read this !! Im feeling a Nerdgasm !! :D :D !!Reply
I now really want a laptop with Llano. Also first.Reply
AMD is kind of in a fix here, the more enthusiast gamers won't even bother looking at the Llano computers while this is kind of overkill for casual gamers. MAYBE money-pressed college students or something, but most people will just skip this and either buy a regular gaming computer or build their own using one of the guides from this very site! Going for good graphics in cheap desktops is kind of a futile exercise, the people who will care will just get the more expensive stuff anyways. Notebooks are more understandable, but the prices on the decent gaming desktops are just too good for Llano to be very competitive (and also, the CPU portion will be a letdown for the average person. Noticeably slower than the comparable Intel Core i5.)Reply
Do you know when the desktop review for llano will be out?Reply
Good job, AMD. You finally made a better cpu/gpu combo than intel in terms of graphics power.Reply
....big win there...
After reading the desktop benchmarks on anandtech I can't say I'm impressed. The top of the line a8 3850 manages to scratch the best intel integrated graphics, which doesn't say much. Its CPU power seems to be a toss up with the i3. I think this hardly justifies the +70 premium (over an i3) that you'd have to spend to get it.Reply
This APU being somewhat low power and good graphics almost deserves to be in a tablet PC since CPU processing is not critical in tablet PC's and graphics is something that can help with media and games.Reply
Ditto on the "Good Job AMD" definitely on the right track.
vz7Do you know when the desktop review for llano will be out?Reply
The NDA is up on the 30th.
1) What happened to the Game Charts results for the Radeon HD 5570, when the games were benchmarked? I thought you made a point to say you were going to compare the APU's 6620G with a discrete card (that has the same number of SPs and same clock). So much for that, unless you thought only comparing the two with a synthetic test was enough. Oh well. Tom's can be such a tease!
2) I'm just a little disappointed that the APU's graphics power was not able to double Intel's.... Under the best of circumstances, AMD's latest integrated graphics came close to being twice as fast, but i guess that is ok since we are not playing horseshoes. I just thought it would be nice if it had made a nice even doubling, or more. Now, i'm worried IVY BRIDGE will beat it....
sorry, i guess that should be:Reply
we ARE playing horseshoes...
and i have to give credit where credit is due: props to AMD for almost doubling Intel's HD Graphics in the integrated space....