System Builder Marathon, Sept. 2010: $1000 Enthusiast PC
Features
By
Don Woligroski
published
Benchmark Results: Crysis And Call Of Duty
Crysis is a graphics-heavy game, but at no time does the previous Phenom II X3 720/Radeon HD 5830 CrossFire combo beat out the Core i5-750/GeForce GTX 470 system with any real authority.
At very high settings, the CrossFire rig does surpass the new system. However, the spread is smaller than we'd expect.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 shows a slight advantage in favor of the CrossFire'd Radeon HD 5830s at 2560x1600 when 4x anti-aliasing (AA) is enabled.
But, apart from that, the overclocked Core i5-750 system claims a clean sweep at all other settings.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: Crysis And Call Of Duty
Prev Page Benchmark Results: Productivity Next Page Benchmark Results: DiRT 2 And S.T.A.L.K.E.R.TOPICS
73 Comments
Comment from the forums
-
sassan_88 ha ha Intel+nvidia beats amd based system!!!just like alwaysReply
and everyone is going to shoot me after this comment!! -
Wonder why the i5 vs the 1055t? I mean, the 1055t is pretty close to the i7 in multithreaded apps, and enthusiasts tend to run multithreaded programs.Reply
-
cleeve E_manWonder why the i5 vs the 1055t?Reply
This isn't really an i5 vs. 1055T article, there aren't even any 1055T performance numbers here. It's focused on the current $1000 PC vs the previous $1000 PC.
Having said that, performance between all the builds will be compared in the upcoming conclusion article, and the ~$200 price of both the i5-750 and 1055T more than justifies a comparison. I'm certainly interested in seeing how they stack up against one another.
E_man I mean, the 1055t is pretty close to the i7 in multithreaded apps, and enthusiasts tend to run multithreaded programs.
Enthusiasts run a lot of stuff, heavily threaded and sometimes only using a processor. Enthusiasts play games, too, and those rarely take advantage of more than two or three cores... -
iamtheking123 I think the question you guys are missing is: do you really need to spend $1000? As it stands you could build the June $1000 PC today for about $850 or so. And I have no doubt that a system like that would have no problem gaming a few years into the future. In terms of sheer performance, this build is better, but the June build is far more bang for the buck.Reply -
Tamz_msc Prices have dropped these days.You can add GTX 460 768 MB SLI if you look for combos and MIRs.A great build nonetheless.Why didn't you get the Antec three hundred Illusion?It comes with the front fans pre-installed for 10 bucks more.Reply -
dauthus I was hoping to see a pair of of gtx 460's in SLI, but I suppose that would have put the build slightly over budget. While I generally prefer single graphic solutions, the gf100 architecture makes me sad.Reply -
elel dauthusI was hoping to see a pair of of gtx 460's in SLI, but I suppose that would have put the build slightly over budget. While I generally prefer single graphic solutions, the gf100 architecture makes me sad.I'm guessing that these cards weren't out at the time.Reply -
Its really impressive on how intel i5 can perform and power up that gtx 470, makin it better choise than 2 ati at same money!Reply
Intel really makes difference , that´s why it been always a little more pricey i guess... -
willgart good point... what is the today price of the june 1000$ system? could you include the June 2000$ system in the comparison too?Reply
so will have a june 850$(?) vs august 1000$ vs june 1700$(?) comparison.