MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk MAX Wifi PZ Review: Project Zero cleans up the cables

MSI’s Project Zero concept cleans up wiring by moving most connectivity to the rear

MSI X870E Tomahawk MAX Wifi PZ
(Image credit: © Future)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The MSI X870E Tomahawk MAX Wifi PZ is an excellent mid-range choice for a back-connect PC build. It provides a comprehensive feature set and attractive styling at a reasonable $320 price.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Clean appearance without front connections

  • +

    Three type-C ports on rear IO

  • +

    Wi-Fi 7 and 5 GbE

  • +

    Two PCIe 5.0 x4 M.2 sockets*

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Needs a PZ/BTF-compatible case

  • -

    *2nd PCIe 5.0 socket runs at 5.0 x2 by default

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

We’ve taken a close look at MSI’s back-connect motherboards before from a build-specific angle, but the X870E Tomahawk MAX Wi-Fi PZ (the “PZ” in the name stands for Project Zero) is the first board from the lineup to land on our review testbed. MSI’s PZ line relocates most connectors to the back of the board for cleaner cable management and a more aesthetically pleasing front view of the PC. Along with MSI PZ chassis (required, in four options) and PZ video cards, they offer a unified design that aims to minimize the unsightly cables in non-back-connect PCs.

The X870E Tomahawk MAX Wifi PZ ($319.99) is a well-rounded solution in the mid-range PC space. In addition to its back-mount features, you get ample storage options, fast networking, 40 Gbps USB 4, robust power delivery, EZ DIY functionality, and the new(ish) Click BIOS X. As far as looks go, the PZ/back connect element really cleans up the appearance and does a great job of hiding a vast majority of wires, especially when using PZ graphics cards. The white/silver theme looks great, especially in the available MSI PZ chassis.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Joe Shields
Staff Writer, Components

Joe Shields is a staff writer at Tom’s Hardware. He reviews motherboards and PC components.

  • Misgar
    "The other full-length slots connect through the chipset, running at PCIe 3.0 x1 (PCI_E2) and PCIe 4.0 x4 (PCI_E3), which should provide sufficient bandwidth for most expansion cards."
    Whilst I welcome the use of full length slots, why bother when PCI_E2 has only one lane?

    How many people will fit a full x16 or x8 lane card if they can only use a single lane.

    I install 10Gig NICs and SAS HBA controller cards in the second and third slots on a number of machines, so I buy mobos to suit.

    On my non-Xeon platforms, I accept the fact I can only use 4 lanes on some secondary or tertiary slots with an 8 lane card, but a single lane just isn't enough when you need more bandwidth.

    It would make more sense to fit a x4 lane connector or be brutally honest and use a x1 socket, but that would spoil the aesthetics and would be sacrilege.

    By the time you've added hardware and possibly a riser card for a GPU, the second PCIe slot might be obscured, so what's the point of wasting money on a x16 connector?

    I suspect it's just a marketing ploy and to hell with any confusion caused to the uninitiated. They'll plug in their x4, x8 or x16 card and wonder why it doesn't perform as advertised.

    Trouble is, a x1 connector would look plain ugly and sales might suffer.
    Reply
  • decembermouse
    I'm not sure I like having the fan headers on the back of the mobo. I'd have to stretch the cables around the edge of the board. That doesn't really help hide the cables any better than if they were on the front of the board. What might be nice would be to have a hole large enough for the connector and wire to pass through, right next to the CPU, and a plug to go in the hole once the wire is through. I've never seen a mobo with holes in it though and there may be good reasons not to do this. I'm just not a fan of having fan wires cover even more ground on their way to the headers than they already do. The longer the distance the fan wires have to cover, the more visually obvious they are.
    Reply