ASRock X870 LiveMixer Wifi motherboard review: Connectivity for the creator

Connecting the creator to all of their peripherals

ASRock X870 LiveMixer Wifi
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

ASRock’s X870 LiveMixer has enough connectivity for almost anyone. Priced at $229.99, this board offers loads of USB ports, a flagship-grade audio codec, and accessible PCIe slots for additional expansion, making it ideal for creators on a budget.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    16 rear USB ports

  • +

    Flagship-class audio codec

  • +

    Three, well spaced full-length PCIe slots for expansion

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Lots of lane sharing among M.2

  • -

    USB4 Port speed cut in half with M2_2 populated

  • -

    Two SATA ports could limit some users

  • -

    Not the fastest Wi-Fi 7

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The ASRock X870 LiveMixer Wifi motherboard, similar to its B850 LiveMixer counterpart ($189.99), is engineered with content creators in mind, offering extensive connectivity for streaming and various peripherals. The X870 model delivers enhanced, faster connectivity, benefiting not only creators but also a wider range of users. Its black-on-silver aesthetic mirrors that of the B850 version we reviewed, and looks good with a wide variety of build themes. Overall, it's a viable budget option for those who require abundant USB ports and other expansion options.

For $229.99, the LiveMixer gets you a whopping sixteen USB ports on the rear IO (13x Type-A, 3x Type-C). If this isn’t enough for 99% of those reading this, I’d be surprised. You’re not going to find a board from this generation with more ports on the rear IO. Content Creators often use capture cards and other PCIe expansion cards, so having two free slots in addition to the primary graphics slot is also useful. On top of that, you get fast networking (5 GbE and Wi-Fi 7, though only 160 Hz), a flagship-class audio codec, capable power delivery, and ample storage options (though a lot of that bandwidth is shared, which we’ll touch on later). For under $230, this is a capable and well-rounded solution in terms of hardware.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Joe Shields
Staff Writer, Components

Joe Shields is a staff writer at Tom’s Hardware. He reviews motherboards and PC components.

  • Marlin1975
    Is this one going to kill CPUs like other Asrock boards?
    Hard to trust them until they get that fixed 100%
    Reply
  • Moxylite
    "hard to trust them" I second that notion ~!

    ( but i understand that Tom's has to eat, and welcome all Asrock placements.)

    anecdotally, the only mobo/gpu i've had catch on fire were both from asrock

    and they have not doing themselves any favors for ages.

    "Gamers Nexus data indicated that over 80% of complaints originate from ASRock products. The controversy extends beyond recent issues. In the past, ASRock faced criticism for misleading advertising, such as falsely claiming support for Ryzen 5000 processors on B450 motherboards, which they later removed without explanation.

    Additionally, earlier Intel-based motherboards from ASRock were criticized for enforcing power limits that crippled performance despite advertising support for high-wattage CPUs. These historical issues have contributed to a broader perception of inconsistent quality and transparency.

    In a separate incident, AMD reportedly banned ASRock from selling graphics cards in Europe, citing business or compliance reasons, though ASRock disputed the claim. This further highlights tensions between the two companies"
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    Marlin1975 said:
    Is this one going to kill CPUs like other Asrock boards?
    Hard to trust them until they get that fixed 100%
    Considering I saw a report yesterday of a dead X3D chip in the asrock sub reddit probably a good idea.
    Reply
  • HideOut
    "The power consumption of the Ryzen 9 9990X is relatively low compared to the 7950X used for the X670/X670E platform. In the past, high-end boards peaked at nearly 300W, but current systems now reach a maximum of 250- 270W during CPU stress tests (gaming with the Nvidia RTX 4080 versus the RTX 3070 is a different matter)."

    Did AMD release a new CPU
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    HideOut said:
    "The power consumption of the Ryzen 9 9990X is relatively low compared to the 7950X used for the X670/X670E platform. In the past, high-end boards peaked at nearly 300W, but current systems now reach a maximum of 250- 270W during CPU stress tests (gaming with the Nvidia RTX 4080 versus the RTX 3070 is a different matter)."

    Did AMD release a new CPU
    its a typo since there is no 9990X cpu.

    So the question remains what cpu did they use to test this. 9900X or 9950X

    If they used the 12 core model that would explain lower power consumption vs the 7950X
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Asrock always made very good and affordable boards. They just kill some cpus on process... nothing more than a nightmare.

    My H670 board with the first bios have pci 5.0 on the ssd slot... and unlimited power to the cpu. AT this day can give unlimited power to the cpu. (this board only gives 170w to the cpu) but it's unlimited.
    The best asrock board made at this day is the Asrock b660-hdv which can fry the VRM and the cpu.
    Reply