Asus ROG Swift PG27AQWP-W 27-inch 540 Hz QHD OLED gaming monitor review: Every piece of performance tech in a single display

Asus puts all the gaming monitor tech in its arsenal into the flagship ROG Swift PG27AQWP-W.

Asus PG27AQWP-W
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

There is nothing to complain about here. The Asus ROG Swift PG27AQWP-W is high-end in every way and not as expensive as you’d expect. It’s super speedy and responsive with a stunning picture to match. It proves the concept that you never regret buying the best.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Brighter than most OLEDs

  • +

    Colorful and accurate

  • +

    Premium video processing with unique 720 Hz mode

  • +

    High-end build quality and unique styling

  • +

    LED lighting, USB ports

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    No internal speakers

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

When Asus releases a new ROG Swift display, you can expect it to feature the latest technology and maximum performance. These flagship models are the hypercars of computer monitors with price-no-object design and engineering.

If you follow my display reviews, you know that I recommend the best OLED gaming monitors as the tech of choice when budgets allow. There is no LCD variant as smooth, nor one that boasts OLED’s perfect black levels and infinite contrast.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.

  • Distortion67
    I'm confused Asus' website clearly states this monitor is a Tandem WOLED but the article states QD-OLED?

    https://shop.asus.com/us/90lm0cf2-b019b2-rog-swift-oled-pg27aqwp-w.html
    Reply
  • marcgii
    Distortion67 said:
    I'm confused Asus' website clearly states this monitor is a Tandem WOLED but the article states QD-OLED?

    https://shop.asus.com/us/90lm0cf2-b019b2-rog-swift-oled-pg27aqwp-w.html
    I dusted off my 9 year old account to comment about this. You're correct. this monitor uses LG's new tandem OLED panel instead of Samsung's QD-OLED panel. All the other reviews identify it correctly.

    This is a pretty big error and I'm surprised they haven't corrected it yet.
    Reply
  • Distortion67
    Yeah everything else I've seen definitely calls this a Tandem WOLED.... Just to make sure I think they should send me the review model so I can verify it.
    Reply
  • lizardpeter
    I'm sorry, but there must be something either majorly wrong with your unit or majorly wrong with your testing. There is not a chance in hell that the monitor has anywhere near 22 ms of "input lag." That would be almost 11 frames. Hardware Unboxed and TFTCentral have already tested this display and found it to have the lowest or tied with the lowest input lag they have ever seen. I would say it was your testing method compared to theirs, but you have a different 480 Hz OLED monitor scoring 10 ms on the same test. There is no possible way that ASUS's flagship 540 Hz OLED tested by other reviewers and found to have the lowest latency ever recorded is 12 ms slower (multiple frames) than an inferior 480 Hz OLED from LG.
    Reply