Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 240 Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor review: Asus delivers a true flagship OLED

32-inch Quantum Dot OLED with 4K resolution, 240 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, HDR10, Dolby Vision, BlackShield Film, DisplayHDR 500, and wide gamut color

Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDM3
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 has no real flaws, it is a superlative gaming monitor with speedy play and a gorgeous picture to match. It’s expensive but if you have the budget, there’s nothing better among 32-inch 4K panels.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Stunning image for HDR and SDR

  • +

    Dolby Vision support

  • +

    Brighter than many others in SDR mode

  • +

    BlackShield film improves ambient light management

  • +

    Super quick with smooth motion and instant response

  • +

    Premium build quality+

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    No internal speakers

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Flagship gaming monitors come in many shapes and sizes, so focusing on one category is impractical. But it is generally accepted that the best format for do-it-all displays is a large 16:9 flat panel. 32 inches used to be the realm of the exotic, but now you can find the best gaming monitors for less than $1,300.

On my planet, flagship means OLED, and this world’s newest resident is Asus’ ROG Swift PG32UCDM3. It’s a 32-inch Quantum Dot OLED with 4K resolution, 240 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, ELMB, and wide gamut color. HDR carries a VESA DisplayHDR 500 certification, and in addition to HDR10 support, you get Dolby Vision too. Asus has added a technology called BlackShield that makes the screen’s front surface harder and improves perceived black levels. Let’s take a look.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.

  • COLGeek
    Must be an okay device when the only con is a lack of speakers (which no serious user would rely upon).

    Rather pricey from the one (Asus) site I saw it listed. That will be the more significant con for many.
    Reply
  • truerock
    I hate internal speakers!

    Huge plus: no internal speakers
    Reply
  • Rand0m_Guy
    The Asus XG32UCWMG has a better image and I notice its nowhere in your reviews or comparisons. Unfortunately for the WOLED variant, they only put a DP1.4 on it, not the DP2.1 they have on the QD-OLED 🙁

    And Contrast is measurable on a QD-OLED. The proof, put a WOLED and a QD-OLED next to each other in a dark room with a black screen, the QD-OLED screens glow, WOLED doesn't!
    Reply
  • NayWard
    So expensive if you use a multi monitor set up you'll pay more than you would for a decent second hand car. Or 3 months rent. AUD

    And of course... it's out of stock.
    Reply
  • Blacksad999
    Basically every single monitor review on this site is 4 stars+. It makes it hard to take the critiques seriously compared to other monitor review sites.

    Maybe find a different rating system that's more comprehensive and detailed. This stretches back a long time on here.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/monitors/gaming-monitors/benq-mobiuz-ex271uz-27-inch-240-hz-4k-oled-gaming-monitor-review
    https://www.tomshardware.com/monitors/gaming-monitors/asus-rog-strix-xg27jcg-27-inch-5k-gaming-monitor-review
    https://www.tomshardware.com/monitors/gaming-monitors/asus-proart-pa32kcx-32-inch-8k-professional-monitor-review
    https://www.tomshardware.com/monitors/gaming-monitors/asus-rog-strix-xg27aqwmg-27-inch-280-hz-oled-gaming-monitor-review
    https://www.tomshardware.com/monitors/gaming-monitors/ktc-h27e6-27-inch-320-hz-qhd-gaming-monitor-review
    https://www.tomshardware.com/monitors/gaming-monitors/samsung-odyssey-oled-g6-s27fg60-27-inch-500-hz-qd-oled-gaming-monitor-review
    Reply
  • LostFate
    Blacksad999 said:
    Basically every single monitor review on this site is 4 stars+. It makes it hard to take the critiques seriously compared to other monitor review sites.

    Maybe find a different rating system that's more comprehensive and detailed. This stretches back a long time on here.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/monitors/gaming-monitors/benq-mobiuz-ex271uz-27-inch-240-hz-4k-oled-gaming-monitor-review
    https://www.tomshardware.com/monitors/gaming-monitors/asus-rog-strix-xg27jcg-27-inch-5k-gaming-monitor-review
    https://www.tomshardware.com/monitors/gaming-monitors/asus-proart-pa32kcx-32-inch-8k-professional-monitor-review
    https://www.tomshardware.com/monitors/gaming-monitors/asus-rog-strix-xg27aqwmg-27-inch-280-hz-oled-gaming-monitor-review
    https://www.tomshardware.com/monitors/gaming-monitors/ktc-h27e6-27-inch-320-hz-qhd-gaming-monitor-review
    https://www.tomshardware.com/monitors/gaming-monitors/samsung-odyssey-oled-g6-s27fg60-27-inch-500-hz-qd-oled-gaming-monitor-review
    They make all their money through affiliate links... They'd literally be leaving money on the table if they ever gave out bad (or mediocre) reviews. It's part of the reason they downplay OLED burn-in on every monitor review; if monitors are disposable, they make more money on a more reoccurring basis.
    Reply
  • cknobman
    As nice as displays like this are I just could never spend $1200+ on a monitor like that.
    Heck I could go get a 65' OLED TV for my living room for much less than that price.
    Reply
  • JayGau
    Rand0m_Guy said:
    The Asus XG32UCWMG has a better image and I notice its nowhere in your reviews or comparisons. Unfortunately for the WOLED variant, they only put a DP1.4 on it, not the DP2.1 they have on the QD-OLED 🙁

    And Contrast is measurable on a QD-OLED. The proof, put a WOLED and a QD-OLED next to each other in a dark room with a black screen, the QD-OLED screens glow, WOLED doesn't!
    To be fair, the "glowing" on QD panels comes from the reflection of the ambient light on the quantum-dot layer. In a perfectly dark room, you can't see it since there is no light to be reflected. But I still went with the WOLED model because I wanted to make sure I would get the perfect black experience, even though my computer room is quite dark.

    How do you know the XG32UCWMG has a better image? Did you personally compare them?
    Reply
  • helper800
    Rand0m_Guy said:
    The Asus XG32UCWMG has a better image and I notice its nowhere in your reviews or comparisons. Unfortunately for the WOLED variant, they only put a DP1.4 on it, not the DP2.1 they have on the QD-OLED 🙁

    And Contrast is measurable on a QD-OLED. The proof, put a WOLED and a QD-OLED next to each other in a dark room with a black screen, the QD-OLED screens glow, WOLED doesn't!
    I have both an LG CX OLED and a Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P. In a dark room they look exactly the same. There is no discernable 'glow' in the QD-OLED.
    Reply
  • Scubamedicjoe
    Rand0m_Guy said:
    The Asus XG32UCWMG has a better image and I notice its nowhere in your reviews or comparisons. Unfortunately for the WOLED variant, they only put a DP1.4 on it, not the DP2.1 they have on the QD-OLED 🙁

    And Contrast is measurable on a QD-OLED. The proof, put a WOLED and a QD-OLED next to each other in a dark room with a black screen, the QD-OLED screens glow, WOLED doesn't!
    ACTUALLY IT DOES HAVE
    DisplayPort 2.1 x 1

    helper800 said:
    I have both an LG CX OLED and a Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P. In a dark room they look exactly the same. There is no discernable 'glow' in the QD-OLED.
    ACTUALLY IT DOES HAVE
    DisplayPort 2.1 x 1
    Reply