Intel's New Weapon: The Coppermine

Office Application Performance Under Windows NT4

Swipe to scroll horizontally
SYSmark98 - WindowsNT4 Header Cell - Column 1 Header Cell - Column 2 Header Cell - Column 3 Header Cell - Column 4
CPU Score Row 0 - Cell 2 CPU Score
Pentium III 500 229 Row 1 - Cell 2 Athlon 500 257
Pentium III 500E 254 Row 2 - Cell 2 Row 2 - Cell 3 Row 2 - Cell 4
Pentium III 533B 239 Row 3 - Cell 2 Row 3 - Cell 3 Row 3 - Cell 4
Pentium III 533EB 258 Row 4 - Cell 2 Row 4 - Cell 3 Row 4 - Cell 4
Pentium III 550 247 Row 5 - Cell 2 Athlon 550 275
Pentium III 550E 270 Row 6 - Cell 2 Row 6 - Cell 3 Row 6 - Cell 4
Pentium III 600 268 Row 7 - Cell 2 Athlon 600 292
Pentium III 600B 259 Row 8 - Cell 2 Row 8 - Cell 3 Row 8 - Cell 4
Pentium III 600E 286 Row 9 - Cell 2 Row 9 - Cell 3 Row 9 - Cell 4
Pentium III 600EB 280 Row 10 - Cell 2 Row 10 - Cell 3 Row 10 - Cell 4
Pentium III 650 302 Row 11 - Cell 2 Athlon 650 306
Pentium III 667 302 Row 12 - Cell 2 Row 12 - Cell 3 Row 12 - Cell 4
Pentium III 700 318 Row 13 - Cell 2 Athlon 700 319
Pentium III 733 324 Row 14 - Cell 2 Row 14 - Cell 3 Row 14 - Cell 4
Pentium III 750 (overclocked) 329 Row 15 - Cell 2 Athlon 750 (overclocked) 333
Row 16 - Cell 0 Row 16 - Cell 1 Row 16 - Cell 2 Kryotech Cool Athlon 800 347
Row 17 - Cell 0 Row 17 - Cell 1 Row 17 - Cell 2 Kryotech Cool Athlon 900 371

Coppermine gets a lot closer under Windows NT and the i820-scores we produced were even almost identical to the Athlon-scores. However, i820 is not available, so that Coppermine is slightly slower than Athlon in office applications under Windows NT.