LG DualUp 28MQ780 Monitor Review: A Unique New Display Shape

The LG DualUp is a 28-inch 16:18 monitor.

Reviews
By Christian Eberle
published
LG DualUp 28MQ780
(Image: © LG)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The invention of the LCD panel has revolutionized the video display. Many users aren’t old enough to remember the CRT monitors that sat on many desktops with their tremendous depth and screens that are tiny by today’s standards. LCDs can be manufactured in nearly any square or rectangular shape and to that end, we have 16:9, 21:9 and 32:9 and a host of curved screens.

LG has leveraged its ability to develop its own panel parts to create something completely different, and I daresay, very cool. The DualUp 28MQ780 is a truly unique monitor, for now at least, that makes a lot of work easier.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

As a gaming monitor, the 28MQ780 is fine for games where refresh rate doesn't present an advantage. It presents a huge image that envelopes the user both vertically and horizontally. With a very wide and accurate color gamut, you’ll enjoy lush and realistic environments. And its 140ppi pixel density means you won’t see any dots, even when sitting close. It’s the same as two 21-inch QHD screens, just without the dividing line.

Browsing web pages and editing documents are the 28MQ780’s greatest strength. You can see a full page in a large view whether it’s a letter, musical score or movie poster. It’s also great for PBP work when you need to see two sources at once. Since it stacks two 16:9 images, there’s no distortion. I could see my laptop screen along with a Windows desktop from a test PC with clarity and ease. The only thing that was less satisfying was watching video. There, I could only use half the screen’s area to watch YouTube. Since nearly all content is in the 16:9 format, the 28MQ780 is not ideal as a movie machine.

There are plenty of situations where the DualUp 28MQ780 will be helpful. Thanks to terrific build quality and the included mounting arm, you’ll have plenty of installation flexibility. If you’re looking for something different to get yourself through the workday, the 28MQ780 is highly recommended.

Christian Eberle
Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.

24 Comments Comment from the forums
  • brandonjclark
    This would be a pretty sweet coding monitor!
    Reply
  • drajitsh
    Consider this vs 2 bog standard (200-250$) UHD monitors with vesa arms
    1 . Games -- how many titles support a single monitor of this resolution vs dual monitor support. Of course both configurations would require some really high end GFX.
    consuming video-- why would you require to see a play list this long.
    Web browsing -- most websites would do better with a UHD in portrait mode, same for coding.
    Photo and video editing -- you can have a professional monitor for the subject (photo or video) and a standard monitor for toolbars/thumbnails etc.
    Request could you also give gamut volume and coverage vs AdobeRGB. Should not take very long and I think it still has relevance in print work. Also, every DSLR and mirrorless supports AdobeRGB
    Reply
  • helper800
    drajitsh said:
    Consider this vs 2 bog standard (200-250$) UHD monitors with vesa arms
    1 . Games -- how many titles support a single monitor of this resolution vs dual monitor support. Of course both configurations would require some really high end GFX.
    consuming video-- why would you require to see a play list this long.
    Web browsing -- most websites would do better with a UHD in portrait mode, same for coding.
    Photo and video editing -- you can have a professional monitor for the subject (photo or video) and a standard monitor for toolbars/thumbnails etc.Request could you also give gamut volume and coverage vs AdobeRGB. Should not take very long and I think it still has relevance in print work. Also, every DSLR and mirrorless supports AdobeRGB
    I think its mainly for productivity and programming while being borderless. Two individual monitors next to each other is never going to be as nice as one large panel with no bezels.
    Reply
  • HideOut
    ...or get a dell professional that rotates 90 degrees...
    Reply
  • srl99
    If you really like the shape, ok. Otherwise, save big $s and get a 4k. You'll also get more pixels.

    If you do buy this, get some protection against problems. LG "warranty" service will leave you with an empty desk for up to a month.
    Reply
  • voyteck
    When the first desktop LCD panels appeared, they too were made in 4:3 aspect like a television.

    It's not entirely untrue since there were indeed 4 : 3 models from the beginning but I suppose you meant 5 : 4, which was the dominant aspect ratio. For example, EIZO in one of their first lineups of LCDs offered two models: L66 (1280 × 1024, 5 : 4) and L360 (1024 × 768, 4 : 3).
    Reply
  • bit_user
    brandonjclark said:
    This would be a pretty sweet coding monitor!
    Not the way I code. I often have about 4-5 files open at a time, usually positioned next to each other. Also, a couple terminal windows on a second monitor (or off in the corner of a single 4k monitor I sometimes use).

    I do want a bit more vertical realestate, but this is too much. I wish 16:10 monitors were more popular. I had a 1920x1200 monitor and it was great. I'd love a 2560x1600.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    helper800 said:
    Two individual monitors next to each other is never going to be as nice as one large panel with no bezels.
    Depends on whether you use them for the same thing. I tend to put terminal windows and API docs on the second monitor, which is slightly off to the side. My primary is bigger and directly in front of me.

    When I switch to a different setup with just a single 32" 4k monitor, I find I miss having the borders of the second monitor for facilitating window placement & layout. First world problems, I know.
    Reply
  • CooliPi
    My question is - how well does it work with Raspberry Pi 4 ? Are two HDMI outputs needed, or does it run with only one (it should)? Are there any problems like EDID information incompatibility, does it run out of the box etc.

    I think this would be a good monitor for coding - fitting most of the functions on one page, hence making better feeling for what's inside what (nested loops etc).

    Raspberry Pi 4 is my personal workstation now, 'cause it's powerful enough for my needs and dead silent. And most of the time I'm doing research on the internet and writing code, browsing long logs, using ssh.

    I've been waiting for this type of aspect ratio since widescreen BS came in. The reason not to get a widescreen monitor and rotate it is subpixel antialiasing though, which greatly helps with horizontal resolution (or vertical, if you rotate widescreen monitor, but I don't consider it usable for nice rendered alphabets).

    Mind you, the vertical number of pixels is even higher than on my 16:10 4k monitor (2880 vs 2400).
    Reply
  • mickrc3
    It sounds possible that this monitor size will become popular but consider that as a poineer device the LG is priced over the cost of many large 4K monitors and most usable 40in-60in 4K TVs. I just bought two LG 32in 32UL500-W 4K monitors during the Eggs sale at ran head-to-head with Prime Days. They were $250 each and though also only 60hz they did have adaptive sync. I'm running an Acer 48in 4K monitor which I used for coding plus I have a Samsung 28in 4K as a secondary monitor and I have an old Seiki 39in 4K which defaults to a TV but is also connected to my PC to function as a third monitor when needed. That's 3840x2160 per monitor and in the L shape that I have them set up in that gives me a tallest vertical of 4320 pixels and longest horizontal of 7680 pixels. I have used both long dimensions before especially when working on large spreadsheets.

    Even though I'm retired now I've kept the same arrangement as I am used to it.
    Reply