The world’s first transatlantic fiber-optic cable is being ripped up after 37 years on the sea floor — TAT-8 to be removed after entering service in 1988, broke in 2002

Undersea cable
(Image credit: Getty / Eoneren)

Subsea Environmental Services is currently hauling TAT-8, the first fiber-optic cable ever laid across the Atlantic Ocean, off the seabed near Portugal, according to a WIRED feature published this week. Built by AT&T, British Telecom, and France Telecom, the cable entered service on December 14, 1988, and was taken out of operation in 2002 after developing a fault too expensive to repair. It has sat on the ocean floor for more than two decades.

TAT-8 — short for Trans-Atlantic Telephone 8 — was the eighth transoceanic cable system across the Atlantic, but the first to transmit traffic using optical fibers rather than copper. Its capacity was exhausted within 18 months of launch, which effectively proved the model for every major undersea cable that followed. By 2001, the TAT series had reached number 14. At its launch, science fiction writer Isaac Asimov addressed audiences in Paris and London via video link from New York, calling it "this maiden voyage across the sea on a beam of light."

Article continues below

The Bell Labs facility in Holmdel, New Jersey, where the underlying technology was developed and tested, is now a mixed-use complex called Bell Works. It’s perhaps better known today as the filming location for Lumon Industries' headquarters in the Apple TV+ series Severance. During renovation, workers found 18 kilometers of early TAT-8 sea trial cable in the basement.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • CenozoicSynapsid
    Should've kept it as a decoy for the cookie cutter sharks so that they don't mess with the active ones as much.
    Reply
  • Dementoss
    If the cable is redundant and, going to be dismantled, why would breaking the optical fibres matter? They are probably most likely going to be melted down, to make new glass things, as it would surely be very difficult at best, to recover them intact from the cables, as they are dismantled.
    Reply
  • SkyBill40
    I'm confused here: If the cable developed a fault deemed too expensive to repair, then what's the fuss in how it's coiled? If it's damaged already, what does it matter if the fiber inside is fractured or what not? Unless they're going to somehow try and repair the damaged section and repurpose the cable, I don't see why all the care needs to be applied.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    The article said:
    The cable itself has to be coiled by hand in the ship's hold, as fiber-optic cable can't be machine-coiled without risking damage to the glass fibers inside.
    OMG! Job-wise, this is probably like the modern equivalent to peeling potatoes in the ship's galley.
    Reply
  • DS426
    Hand-coiled? Machinery coiled it in the first place from the factory and laid it on the ocean floor, so I'm pretty sure machinery would do just fine at coiling it up again. Not sure how the integrity of the glass matters now, anyways.

    Also, great mention on the upcoming copper shortage problem. I wonder what two letters are to blame for that?...
    Reply
  • passivecool
    But they can deconstruct the cable without damaging the glass fibers? Ans some idiot is going to say sure: i'm happy to save .002/m and refunction glass fibers that were under sea for 20 years? It is all to be recycled. Wonderful material to reuse, for sure.
    <Mod Edit>

    who wrote this slop?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    passivecool said:
    forced these companies to take responsibility and go clean up their own mess out of the ocean.
    They said they wanted to remove the cable so that another could reuse the same path.
    Reply
  • kanewolf
    SkyBill40 said:
    I'm confused here: If the cable developed a fault deemed too expensive to repair, then what's the fuss in how it's coiled? If it's damaged already, what does it matter if the fiber inside is fractured or what not? Unless they're going to somehow try and repair the damaged section and repurpose the cable, I don't see why all the care needs to be applied.
    The copper in the cable is the treasure. Bits of glass mixed in would contaminate the copper.
    Reply
  • ferdnyc
    kanewolf said:
    The copper in the cable is the treasure. Bits of glass mixed in would contaminate the copper.
    Exactly right. And more to the point: Disassembling the cable bundle into its constituent recyclable parts will be a lot easier, and a lot less dangerous for the people doing the work, if they're not constantly in danger of impaling their hands on broken shards of optical fiber.
    Reply
  • Robdon326
    So in 1988 there was fiber optic on the ocean floor by Portugal? Yet it took till 2023 to become available on my street in Cleveland,OH.

    Sad
    Reply