Angry TSMC employees considering strikes, unionization over employee bonuses, report claims — company reportedly considering 15% payout cut to fund capex despite record revenues fuelled by AI surge

TSMc
(Image credit: Getty / UCG)

TSMC employees are openly discussing forming a union and staging a strike after rumors spread that the company plans to cut performance bonuses by approximately 15%, according to a DigiTimes report published today. The rumored haircut comes despite TSMC posting a record first-quarter net profit of NT$572.5 billion ($17.9 billion), a 58% year-over-year increase driven by surging AI chip demand. Workers say the company's historical practice of returning roughly 13% of retained earnings as employee bonuses has been cut, even as profits climb, and they’re pointing to Samsung’s recent union deal as a template for action.

TSMC responded by saying it expects employee profit-sharing bonuses to grow faster in 2026 than in 2025, and that it is "fully aware of its growing corporate social responsibility in Taiwan," Digitimes reported.

The most likely explanation for the rumored cut, according to analysts cited by South Korean and Taiwanese media, is TSMC’s capex program. The company is spending $52 billion to $56 billion annually while constructing 12 new fabs across the U.S., Japan, Germany, and Taiwan to secure its lead in 2nm and 1.4nm manufacturing. That outlay appears to be tightening the cash available for employee compensation.

Latest Videos From

Based on 2025 earnings, the average TSMC employee bonus was approximately NT$2.64 million (roughly $87,000), with the total bonus pool reaching around NT$206.1 billion, according to Taiwan’s Liberty Times. Frustrations have risen around the ratio of profits going to employees

The unrest at TSMC has intensified in the wake of Samsung’s landmark union deal last week. Samsung narrowly avoided an 18-day factory shutdown by agreeing to allocate 10.5% of its semiconductor division's operating profit as stock-based bonuses, plus another 1.5% in cash, over a 10-year period. That deal translates to projected average payouts of roughly $340,000 per chip division employee in 2026, based on recent estimates of Samsung's operating profit.

SK hynix agreed to a similar structure last September, setting aside 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. The comparison is undoubtedly painful for TSMC workers, who have no union and no formal mechanism to negotiate collectively; the company has operated without a labor union since its founding in 1987.

Employee frustration has spilled onto Dcard, a Taiwanese workplace community, and dedicated TSMC Facebook pages, where workers have posted complaints ahead of TSMC's shareholder meeting scheduled for May 28th at the company's Hsinchu headquarters. Some have asked whether forming a union would violate Taiwanese law, and others argue that the company prioritizes shareholder returns and overseas expansion over its workforce.

Doris Hsu, chairperson of silicon wafer manufacturer GlobalWafers, has weighed in on the broader debate, saying that across GlobalWafers' 18 factories in nine countries, some have unions and some don’t, and that the key factor in business performance is whether a company shares profits with workers, not whether a union exists.

Samsung's deal, meanwhile, is already facing legal pushback. A shareholder lawsuit challenges the agreement on the grounds that committing a fixed percentage of operating profit to employee payouts over a decade conflicts with the capital demands of chipmaking at scale.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • SSGBryan
    All workers should unionize - it is the only way to keep on an even playing field.
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    TSMC, Samsung, SK Hynix, and others have used their AI-driven shortage windfalls to exaggerate the difference in compensation between executives and average workers. I'd be angry too if I worked at TSMC and faced a huge bonus cut in the face of record profits and record demand. Those employees don't deserve to have their bonuses cut, and the idea of cutting the percentage to make the bonuses closer to the previous year's payout is disgusting given that the company is doing so much better this year than last year. Everyone should benefit.

    SSGBryan said:
    All workers should unionize - it is the only way to keep on an even playing field.
    As long as those unions stay focused on compensation and worker quality of life then we're good. The problem I see with most unions is that they try to exert decision-making control over companies and get involved in politics. I think the strongest role of a union is to shrink the gigantic disparity between executive compensation and average worker compensation such that a successful company rewards all its employees rather than just a handful in the C-suite.
    Reply
  • SSGBryan
    bigdragon said:
    TSMC, Samsung, SK Hynix, and others have used their AI-driven shortage windfalls to exaggerate the difference in compensation between executives and average workers. I'd be angry too if I worked at TSMC and faced a huge bonus cut in the face of record profits and record demand. Those employees don't deserve to have their bonuses cut, and the idea of cutting the percentage to make the bonuses closer to the previous year's payout is disgusting given that the company is doing so much better this year than last year. Everyone should benefit.


    As long as those unions stay focused on compensation and worker quality of life then we're good. The problem I see with most unions is that they try to exert decision-making control over companies and get involved in politics. I think the strongest role of a union is to shrink the gigantic disparity between executive compensation and average worker compensation such that a successful company rewards all its employees rather than just a handful in the C-suite

    How to tell everyone that you have never been involved with a union. Unions are run by the union members, not the Illuminati.

    As long as corporations are involved in politics (representing capital), then unions will be involved (representing labor).
    Reply
  • DS426
    SSGBryan said:
    How to tell everyone that you have never been involved with a union. Unions are run by the union members, not the Illuminati.

    As long as corporations are involved in politics (representing capital), then unions will be involved (representing labor).
    Hmm, slight difference in opinion here, at least in the U.S... depending on which industry you're talking about, Unions are ran by Union bosses, not the members. Sometimes, members don't find this out until 5-10 years in when contract negotations go thru their rounds and even a majority demand is even presented by the bosses.

    Crony capitalism, crony labor representation. Practical reality is very different from ideal reality.
    Reply
  • SSGBryan
    DS426 said:
    Hmm, slight difference in opinion here, at least in the U.S... depending on which industry you're talking about, Unions are ran by Union bosses, not the members. Sometimes, members don't find this out until 5-10 years in when contract negotations go thru their rounds and even a majority demand is even presented by the bosses.

    Crony capitalism, crony labor representation. Practical reality is very different from ideal reality.

    And just how do these "Union bosses" magically appear?
    Reply
  • ManDaddio
    SSGBryan said:
    How to tell everyone that you have never been involved with a union. Unions are run by the union members, not the Illuminati.

    As long as corporations are involved in politics (representing capital), then unions will be involved (representing labor).
    That was a part of more than one Union.. Sure there's a lot of conveniences that come with being part of a union but there's also a lot of BS and political pushing. That's a fact.
    Most unions side with Democrats. That's a big problem right there.
    It's a big lie to say that all conservatives are against unions. And that's what we were always told.
    It takes both sides to get bills passed.
    And a lot of unions do a lot of shady and corrupt stuff. That's also a fact.
    And don't tell me to provide proof. If you look in the right places all the data is out there.
    Simply googling it is not going to get you the answer. Google is also left-leaning. They will never give you all the facts and in a lot of cases they won't tell you the truth.
    Small business is already struggle. To force unions upon them is a death sentence. Unions are not always good.
    Reply
  • SSGBryan
    ManDaddio said:
    That was a part of more than one Union.. Sure there's a lot of conveniences that come with being part of a union but there's also a lot of BS and political pushing. That's a fact.
    Most unions side with Democrats. That's a big problem right there.
    It's a big lie to say that all conservatives are against unions. And that's what we were always told.
    It takes both sides to get bills passed.
    And a lot of unions do a lot of shady and corrupt stuff. That's also a fact.
    And don't tell me to provide proof. If you look in the right places all the data is out there.
    Simply googling it is not going to get you the answer. Google is also left-leaning. They will never give you all the facts and in a lot of cases they won't tell you the truth.
    Small business is already struggle. To force unions upon them is a death sentence. Unions are not always good.
    You sound like management.
    Reply