Every SK hynix employee could receive $477,000 bonuses this year, almost $900,000 next year — 35,000 workers reportedly set to benefit from share of $169 billion projected operating profit
Meanwhile, Samsung's union is threatening a general strike.
The AI chip supercycle is generating such extraordinary profits at South Korea's two largest memory manufacturers that individual employee bonuses at SK hynix could average roughly 700 million won ($477,000) this year, and almost $900,000 next year, according to Korea JoongAng Daily. Samsung Electronics' labor union, meanwhile, has threatened a general strike from May 21st to June 7th after rejecting management's compensation offer.
SK hynix agreed last September to remove its previous bonus cap and allocate 10% of annual operating profit directly to employees as performance-based payouts. With analyst forecasts of some 250 trillion won ($169 billion) in operating profit for 2026, the resulting bonus pool of 25 trillion won would be split among roughly 35,000 workers. It’s understood that the company already paid profit-sharing bonuses averaging about 140 million won (roughly $95,000) per employee in February.
At Samsung, things aren’t looking quite so rosy, as disputes rage on surrounding what percentage of earnings should flow to workers. The company’s union is pushing for 15% of operating profit, which market analysts project will reach roughly 298 trillion won ($202 billion) this year. At that level, the semiconductor division alone would owe approximately 580 million won (~$396,000) per employee across its 77,000-person workforce.
Samsung management countered with a 10% allocation matching SK’s framework, but that proposal was rejected, with the union instead opting to plan a large rally at the company’s Pyeongtaek fab scheduled for April 23rd. Samsung Electronics asked a court last Thursday to block what it called “illegal activities” during a strike. Union chairman Choi Seung-ho says that roughly 200 employees have left for SK hynix over the last four months, according to the Korea Herald.
The scale of these payouts marks a huge reversal of what we’ve seen in recent years. In 2024, Samsung paid no performance bonuses at all after the chip unit posted operating losses throughout 2023’s memory downturn, while SK’s own bonus rate collapsed during the same period. The turnaround has obviously been driven almost entirely by surging demand for HBM and other AI-oriented memory products.
This potential windfall for SK and Samsung employees has sparked unusual public backlash in South Korea, with posts on the anonymous workplace forum Blind arguing that companies benefiting from state infrastructure spending and the K-Chips Act’s 20% tax credits should share their profits more broadly. The combined tax benefits received by both companies over the last two years total an estimated 20 trillion won, which is roughly $13.6 billion.
Looking ahead, the potential bonuses could climb higher still, with investment bank Macquarie having forecasted SK’s operating profit at 447 trillion won ($304.5 billion) for next year, which would push average employee bonuses beyond 1 billion won under the existing 10% profit-sharing agreement.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist. Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.
-
Marlin1975 And that is how you keep employees happy and from leaving.Reply
Better that than making another person a billionaire. -
TechieTwo While I have no issue with spreading the joy around the incredible bonuses illustrates just how evil the exploitation is of those buying the products. As ye sow...Reply -
bigdragon This profit-sharing bonus system should be the norm everywhere. All employees deserve more when the company does well -- not just the leeches in suits at the top.Reply -
DS426 Reply
Beyond the moral or values aspect as you mentioned (and I agree with), it certainly provides a competitive advantage. I'm surprised it's not more common, even with a lower rate like 5%. The labor market had been fairly tight until recently in the U.S. once everyone went back to work after COVID.bigdragon said:This profit-sharing bonus system should be the norm everywhere. All employees deserve more when the company does well -- not just the leeches in suits at the top.
My employer has a profit-sharing program in place -- it's a percentage gain on one's own wage rate and it does have a cap. I assume this is the more common approach as I don't see most employers excited about giving a janitor that makes $40K/yr a $90K bonus. -
S58_is_the_goat If this was an American company they'd get a pizza lunch and 8gb stick of memory...Reply -
thrus Reply
And see how they would like telling all the engineers and executives to empty their own trash to the dumpster and vacume their own floors.DS426 said:Beyond the moral or values aspect as you mentioned (and I agree with), it certainly provides a competitive advantage. I'm surprised it's not more common, even with a lower rate like 5%. The labor market had been fairly tight until recently in the U.S. once everyone went back to work after COVID.
My employer has a profit-sharing program in place -- it's a percentage gain on one's own wage rate and it does have a cap. I assume this is the more common approach as I don't see most employers excited about giving a janitor that makes $40K/yr a $90K bonus. -
acadia11 Reply
You are just noticing now? Atleast the wealth is being spread to the rank and file.TechieTwo said:While I have no issue with spreading the joy around the incredible bonuses illustrates just how evil the exploitation is of those buying the products. As ye sow... -
acadia11 Reply
And why shouldn’t they? Greed is good for some but not others? Good on to the janitor that keeps those clean rooms clean!DS426 said:Beyond the moral or values aspect as you mentioned (and I agree with), it certainly provides a competitive advantage. I'm surprised it's not more common, even with a lower rate like 5%. The labor market had been fairly tight until recently in the U.S. once everyone went back to work after COVID.
My employer has a profit-sharing program in place -- it's a percentage gain on one's own wage rate and it does have a cap. I assume this is the more common approach as I don't see most employers excited about giving a janitor that makes $40K/yr a $90K bonus. -
King_V Reply
I think that 8gb stick of memory is just fantasy. The pizza part, I could believe.S58_is_the_goat said:If this was an American company they'd get a pizza lunch and 8gb stick of memory... -
Rand0m_Guy Reply
You know what a product is worth? A product is worth whatever a person is willing to pay for it... If you are willing to pay so much for a product that employees are getting 6-figure bonuses, thats not the "evil" corporations' fault for "exploiting" you; that's your fault for paying it!TechieTwo said:While I have no issue with spreading the joy around the incredible bonuses illustrates just how evil the exploitation is of those buying the products. As ye sow...
As the consumer, you did nothing to reap the benefits of good profits, the employees did. They earned that bonus, not you. Claiming this is "evil" corporations' "exploiting" you, is just your own conscience trying to justify your own greed and entitlement to something you did not earn or deserve; if you think its over priced and the bonus is too high, dont buy their product.