Intel and McAfee Reveal DeepSAFE Tech

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • oneblackened
    Great idea on paper... The chance for false positives is too high.
    Reply
  • oneblackened
    oneblackenedGreat idea on paper... The chance for false positives is too high.By that, I mean it seems like it would be uncontrollable by the end user.
    Reply
  • eddieroolz
    Even though it sounds like such a good idea, why is there this uneasiness? Maybe McAfee has something to do with it.
    Reply
  • TheWhiteRose000
    I like it.
    :D
    Reply
  • legacy7955
    eddieroolzEven though it sounds like such a good idea, why is there this uneasiness? Maybe McAfee has something to do with it.

    Agreed. They need to PROVE to the consumer that McAfee processes won't stifle the good operating characteristics of the system.
    Reply
  • jryan388
    Or we could just use linux!! FTW!! Too bad no gaming...
    Reply
  • memadmax
    Wait a minute....

    Doesn't DEP(Data Execution Prevention) do the same thing?
    Reply
  • hpglow
    memadmaxWait a minute....Doesn't DEP(Data Execution Prevention) do the same thing?No that prevents buffer overflows. This is to look for root kits.
    Reply
  • deksman
    Wow...
    Intel took one of the biggest pieces of bloatware available that isn't even good at what it does.
    All that cpu performance will easily go down the drain because of this piece of bloat added to the mix.
    Unless of course Intel encourages Mcafee to clean up their act (and product) like Norton did a few years back.
    Reply
  • rantoc
    DEP is Execution Prevention that won't allow code to execute in certain memory spaces that maware could abuse
    Reply