AMD Responds To Nvidia GPP Controversy

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
  • bigpinkdragon286
    Banana Republic Of Gamers
    Reply
  • manleysteele
    For the life of me, I can't figure out how this decision tree by NVidia made it thru the company without someone stopping it in its tracks. It is ridiculous on its face.
    Reply
  • hixbot
    I never really had a problem with gsync, as it is a great feature and Nvidia GPUs are ahead by a mile in performance/watt.
    but I really started to change my mind when I discovered that Display manufacturers are forbidden from adding freesync/vrr to a monitor that has gsync. I'm ok that gsync displays are more expensive, as I understand the tech comes at a cost, but manufacturers should have a right to add freesync as an additional feature. It is insane that a display can't be bought that includes both gsync and freesync. As a consumer this strongly colors my opinion of Nvidia, and not in a good way.
    Reply
  • dudmont
    the genius at NVidia who thought this up, should have his stock options given to homeless bums immediately. GPP is stupid, will backfire, and probably would cost them market share, if AMD had the GPUs to make it happen. As it is, their supply situation sucks, so NVidia will survive this.
    Reply
  • kinggremlin
    Look in the mirror AMD. There's the reason gamers don't have a choice. When was the last time you had single gpu card that traded blows at the highest end without having to make comical ergonomic compromises? The 7970 Ghz? Not coincidently the last AMD/ATi video card I have owned after not owning anyone else going back to the original Radeon.

    Stop over promising, under delivering and wasting time blaming others for your incompetency.
    Reply
  • blppt
    IMO, the problem has never been with the hardware that AMD puts out---my V64 w/c is a beast on paper--its always been about the drivers.

    Comparing hard specs versus the 1080ti FE, is there anything that jumps out at you that would make the 1080ti take the V64 behind the shed and whoop its butt? Sure, the 1080ti has an extra 3GB of framebuffer space, but I don't think there's a single game that struggles with 8GB even at 4K res. Yet, the ti owns the V64 in every single game.

    Drivers, drivers, drivers.
    Reply
  • jaber2
    @MANLEYSTEELE I think it came from the top
    Reply
  • gc9
    @BLPPT ROPs?
    Reply
  • shovelroud
    I would have thought these type of practices violate anti-competition laws in numerous countries?
    When any company leverages its might to restrict another company's trade it should be illegal. History shows that competition breeds innovation and benefits end users as a whole. Got a better product, prove it by performance/price, not by attacking your opposition and restricting their trade.
    Reply
  • kinggremlin
    20894401 said:
    IMO, the problem has never been with the hardware that AMD puts out---my V64 w/c is a beast on paper--its always been about the drivers.

    Comparing hard specs versus the 1080ti FE, is there anything that jumps out at you that would make the 1080ti take the V64 behind the shed and whoop its butt? Sure, the 1080ti has an extra 3GB of framebuffer space, but I don't think there's a single game that struggles with 8GB even at 4K res. Yet, the ti owns the V64 in every single game.

    Drivers, drivers, drivers.

    Even when performance was comparable, their drivers were undeniably awful. It was the norm for them to announce software features that didn't make it into the drivers at release. The final straw for me was a driver update for my 7970 well after release that completely fubar'd multi monitor support for me. All you read on the forums now from AMD fans are how great their drivers are now. I have no idea how true that is, but without a highend competitive card, it doesn't matter to me any more.
    Reply