Apple May Have Cut Kepler GPUs From Some New MacBooks

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Douglas Perry
Contributor

Douglas Perry was a freelance writer for Tom's Hardware covering semiconductors, storage technology, quantum computing, and processor power delivery. He has authored several books and is currently an editor for The Oregonian/OregonLive.

  • Lord Captivus
    Its good for every industry that companies have more than one supplier of "the same thing".
    Having a more even cake distribution ussualy means more effort on suppliers to make their products better.
    Reply
  • LuckyDucky7
    That's too bad... but since when did Apple care about performance?

    It's also strange (to me) that Intel would delay Ivy Bridge because of Apple; because Intel would have known beforehand that Apple would want processors- and they'd need the same number anyways even with a Keplar GPU.
    Reply
  • scook9
    Couldn't possibly have anything to do with Tegra 3 and all the devices it powers that compete with Apple directly......
    Reply
  • olaf
    OMG you won't be able to play on Apple laptops ... oh wait nothing new there :P

    ps: i know there are exceptions so don't start quoting the few rare titles out there :P don't care now , tomorrow or ever about it :) PC's > apple in gaming :P
    Reply
  • A Bad Day
    First AMD is dumped, now Nividia might get dumped. Intel is going to be so happy.
    Reply
  • I have a toshiba with Intel intigrated graphics, fat chance getting updated opengl drivers through intel, as they let toshiba write custom opengl drivers and Toshiba will only upgrade these openGL drivers when hell freezes over!!! Intel if you create a graphics chip you should update the drivers like AMD or Nvidia and never let the OEM write the graphics drivers for Intel HDgraphics!!!
    Reply
  • obsama1
    Just use the new AMD GPUs. Cheaper and (probably) faster than Kepler, but we'll have to wait and see.
    Reply
  • Tab54o
    I'm not even sure why macs need any video cards.
    Reply
  • LuckyDucky nailed it. This would not require a single extra Ivy Bridge CPU than it otherwise would have, the onboard graphics were coming with it regardless of whether they were being used or not. If I had to guess, Intel just requested that the media spin it that way, in the same manner that Intel delays are never really delays... Not that Intel has complete and total control of the tech media.
    Reply
  • balister
    Even if the rumor isn't about supply problems, it's just another way for Apple to make more profit per machine.
    Reply