Tom's Hardware Haswell-Based Builder Sweepstakes: The Three Winning Systems

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

Tom's Hardware is the leading destination for hardcore computer enthusiasts. We cover everything from processors to 3D printers, single-board computers, SSDs and high-end gaming rigs, empowering readers to make the most of the tech they love, keep up on the latest developments and buy the right gear. Our staff has more than 100 years of combined experience covering news, solving tech problems and reviewing components and systems.

  • jimmysmitty
    I could only hope to have won. But still there is always hope.
    Reply
  • sactorage
    Please, Please, PLEASE, tell me I won, it would make this year AMAZING!
    Reply
  • velocityg4
    Those prices are massively inflated. It seems those $12K and $10K computers are nearly double the cost of the parts.

    The CPU should at least be an Intel i7 4960x and 128GB RAM. Perhaps if the 2TB SSD is one of those super fast PCI-e SSD.
    Reply
  • d4z
    waiting for winning e-mail....
    Reply
  • MKBL
    I guess no e-mail so far means I'm not a winner. Next time :)
    Reply
  • smeezekitty
    Kind of depressing that they gave the award to the overpriced machines and origin PC who is kissing NVidia's butt.
    Reply
  • cscott_it
    @MKBL
    That's the spirit bud. I've been entering for a while, but one of these days I'll win something. :)
    Congratulations to the winners!
    Reply
  • clonazepam
    I wish losing all of them up to this point was somehow statistically helpful to winning the next. My criteria for voting was by least expensive. None of them will be relevant in 2-3 years when looking at performance per watt.
    Reply
  • Geef
    They need to do a runner up prize setup with 100 or so of those cheap 8GB flash drives or something, so at least a few people feel like they won something.
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    11886644 said:
    I wish losing all of them up to this point was somehow statistically helpful to winning the next. My criteria for voting was by least expensive. None of them will be relevant in 2-3 years when looking at performance per watt.

    I voted mainly based on what hardware they had that I felt was the best choice.

    I did vote for the Digital Storm one only because I found the cooling system to be beautifully done.
    Reply