Quantum Internet Edges Closer As Researchers Teleport Photon State Six Kilometers Away

Researchers from the University of Calgary, Canada, teleported the state of a photon (particle of light) over a six kilometer distance through a “dark fiber” cable. The accomplishment set a new record in quantum teleportation, getting us a little closer to having quantum networks, and ultimately a quantum internet.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Lucian Armasu is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers software news and the issues surrounding privacy and security.

  • alextheblue
    If we build too many quantum systems and networks, we're going to lag the simulation. :( Keep it simple guys. Nobody likes stuttering. Imagine everything lagging while you're in traffic. Terrible!
    Reply
  • Simon Anderson
    hmm "dark fibre" is an existing term that just means a piece of fibre you own or lease, instead of purchasing bandwidth on someone else's existing network (more common). Are they adding a new definition or just using their dark fibre in a new way?

    But something I don't understand about these entanglement experiments is how the two photons in the pair are actually separated... in layman's terms: do you put a photon in some sort of fancy "jar" that stops it from flying off and bouncing off the nearest cat photo, and physically transport it the 6 kilometers away to City Hall?

    Perhaps their "dark fibre" is still traditional definition: it's a piece of fibre they own, and like article says, they have kept it "bare" without any equipment because that's what's needed for their experiment? The photon from the pair is actually transported on this dark fibre?

    In order to be considered teleportation, whatever photon was sent down the dark fibre, would have to then be stored/contained in preparation for the experiment: the quantum transfer on information from university photon and the city hall photon... otherwise it's just sending light down fibre like any other fibre connection, but measuring it differently?

    In other words, I would imagine, the eventual "end game" is to have a large number of permanent photo pairs spread all around the world: you change one half of pair and the other half changes *bam* instant information transfer... if you need to transfer the photons to their destination before hand, via "dark fibre" or whatever, it kinda defeats the purpose right? Or maybe there's an initial send of say 64 photons from 64 pairs via normally fibre optics, and then those 64 photon pairs are used for information transfer for a certain period of time?
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    18630354 said:
    But something I don't understand about these entanglement experiments is how the two photons in the pair are actually separated... in layman's terms: do you put a photon in some sort of fancy "jar" that stops it from flying off and bouncing off the nearest cat photo, and physically transport it the 6 kilometers away to City Hall?
    The entangled photons are generated through fancy beam-splitting optics. The photons themselves travel the 'slow' speed-of-light way through optical delay lines and fiber. It is only their entangled state which transmits instantaneously.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    18630449 said:
    It is only their entangled state which transmits instantaneously.
    I'm no physicist, but I've read that quantum communication still doesn't exceed the speed of light. I think the main benefits are the supposed security (yeah, I saw the link but didn't click it), as well as needing neither line of sight nor a physical link.

    Being able to send entangled photons on lasers through space or dark fiber solves an important problem of how to keep replenishing the supply of entangled particles, as they eventually become disentangled.
    Reply
  • For those who are curious: according to Google, it takes a little over 20 microseconds for light to travel 6 km.
    This is 2 million times longer than 10 picoseconds.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    "one trillionth--that is, one millionth of one millionth--of a second"

    No, I'm pretty sure "a million of a million" is a "billionth". When are you people from the USA going to get it right? What you refer to of as a "billion" is "thousands of millions" when it should be "millions of millions".

    In any case, very interesting news. I wonder how they are actually measuring the behavior of the protons. In my simple and very limited knowledge of quantum physics, all I know it's not about accurate measurements, but statistical measurements.

    Cheers!
    Reply
  • tubeist-dan
    "The photon whose state was teleported."
    Please read the press release, and fix your headline.
    Reply
  • Lucian Armasu
    H Yuka,

    You're right, some countries use "billion" to describe "a million millions," but internationally trillion seems to be the preferred term, and it's also what the Canadian researchers themselves used.
    Reply
  • sinality
    What the article actually states is the following:
    1) We will still be sending photons down a piece of fiber. nothing different than today
    2) however we will be able to entangle a single photon with one left behind, send one on to the other side. Once it arrives the data on both photons will the same, entanglement.

    Basically this is only serving one purpose, trying to use photon entanglement as a method to encrypt data. Nothing changes are far as latency, capacity, etc.
    Reply
  • McWhiskey
    Today is the first day I have heard of an alternate naming scheme for numbers. Right up until moments ago I thought the entire world worked the same way.
    1,000 - thousand
    1,000,000 - million
    1,000,000,000 - billion
    10^12 - trillion
    10^15 - quadrillion
    10^18 - quintillion
    Meaning 1,000 multiplied 1,000,000 times would equal 1,000,000,000.
    So a thousand millions would be a billion.
    Sub kilo, mega, giga, tera, penta and so on for metric.
    This all fits. Nice and tidy. Logical in my own little brain

    But then I learn after a quick Wikipedia search the above is "short scale." And only applies to U.S., English Canada, and modern British. While "long scale" applies to continental Europe, older British, and French Canada.

    Long scale confuses me a little. there is something called a "milliard" but other than that every "named" number is in increase of 10^6 instead of 10^3.

    Mind blown.
    Reply