The Fastest 3D Cards Go Head-To-Head

Radeon HD 4870 OC

The overclocked MSI Radeon HD 4870 runs at 780 MHz (GPU) and 4,000 MHz GDDR5 RAM clock rate—the stock clock would be 750 MHz and 3,600 MHz. The graphics chip can handle DirectX 10.1, and the sample has 512 MB. At the 1920x1200 resolution with anti-aliasing, the MSI overclock results in a 13% boost in Crysis. When you consider all of the games of the benchmark suite as a whole, 3D performance increases by 3.5% over card at stock clocks.

Its toughest opponent is Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 260. Due to the serious drop in prices, these cards are now much more competitively priced. AMD’s offering is a bit cheaper, but the GTX 260 compensates with that little extra bit of 3D speed. Still, AMD has the edge. The GTX 260, under load, is pretty loud. But it’s still much quieter than the other GT200-based card from Nvidia. AMD’s disadvantage is that power consumption in 2D mode is 147 watts for the entire system, though this is set to change with an upcoming driver.

The greatest advantage of the HD 4870 over AMD’s Radeon HD 4850 is its two-slot fan that expels hot air from the PC chassis. In 2D mode, AMD has taken acoustic output into consideration, but the slow fan speed means that the GPU temperatures hovers around 76 degrees C and more heat is transferred to other PC components. In order to avoid these high figures, check out the Gainward Expertool v4.0 for the 4870, which enables manual fan control.

The fan on our MSI sample gets alternates between loud and soft in 2D mode. The stock configuration, not overclocked, does not use this fan profile. Either the RPMs either remain constant on that board, or the change is too quiet to be heard. Under 3D load, the power supply for the test system using the Radeon HD 4870 draws up to 288 watts. A branded power supply with 240 to 280 watts and 20 to 23 A on the 12 volt rail should be sufficient for a standard system.

  • San Pedro
    Looks like the results for SLI and Crossfire were switched with the single card results. . .
    Reply
  • Duncan NZ
    Not a bad article, really comprehensive.
    My one complaint? Why use that CPU when you know that the test cards are going to max it out? Why not a quad core OC'ed to 4GHz? It'd give far more meaning to the SLI results. We don't want results that we can duplicate at home, we want results that show what these cards can do. Its a GPU card comparason, not a complain about not having a powerful enough CPU story.

    Oh? And please get a native english speaker to give it the once over for spelling and grammar errors, although this one had far less then many articles posted lately.
    Reply
  • elbert
    No 4870x2 in CF so its the worlds top end Nvidia vs ATI mid to low end.
    Reply
  • Lightnix
    It'd be a good article if you'd used a powerful enough CPU and up to date Radeon drivers (considering we're now up to 8.8 now), I mean are those even the 'hotfix' 8.6's or just the vanilla drivers?
    Reply
  • elbert
    Version AMD Catalyst 8.6? Why not just say i'm using ATI drivers with little to no optimizations for the 4800's. This is why the CF benchmarks tanked.
    Reply
  • at 1280, all of the highend cards were CPU limited. at that resolution, you need a 3.2-3.4 c2d to feed a 3870... this article had so much potential, and yet... so much work, so much testing, fast for nothing, because most of the results are very cpu limited (except 1920@AA).
    Reply
  • wahdangun
    WTF, hd4850 SHOULD be a lot faster than 9600 GT and 8800 GT even tough they have 1Gig of ram
    Reply
  • mjam
    No 4870X2 and 1920 X 1200 max resolution tested. How about finishing the good start of an article with the rest of it...
    Reply
  • I agree, the 4870 X2 should have been in there and should have used the updated drivers. Good article but I think you fell short on finishing it.
    Reply
  • @pulasky - Rage much? It's called driver issues you dumbass. Some games are more optimised for multicard setups than others, and even then some favour SLi to Crossfire. And if you actually READ the article rather than let your shrinken libido get the better of you, you'll find that Crossfire does indeed work in CoD4.

    Remember, the more you know.
    Reply