UK Telecoms Come Up With Remedy for Number Shortage

News
By Jane McEntegart
published

Dialing fingers at the ready!

UK telecoms watchdog Ofcom has announced a proposal that could change the way people dial landline numbers. Ofcom's proposal is an effort to free up new phone numbers where supplies are running low. Right now, people making local calls don't need to bother with an area code when dialing a number. However, this means that Ofcom can't allocate local numbers beginning with a zero or a one. This new change, affecting residents in five areas, would see folks having to dial the area code when dialing a local number.

"The number of communications providers has increased significantly over the last ten years, leading to more competition and cheaper landline bills for millions of homes and businesses. But it has also led to increased pressure on the supply of new phone numbers," said Ofcom in a statement. "Requiring landline callers to use the code locally is intended to safeguard the future supply of new landline numbers and avoid the need for more disruptive measures, such as changing existing phone numbers."

Ofcom is launching a consultation on the proposal and hopes to implement the change on October 1, 2014. The watch dog says Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (01202) have been operating off of the new system since last November without issue.

Jane McEntegart
13 Comments Comment from the forums
  • mrmez
    Wuuut?

    Little old Australia switched to 8 digit local phone numbers 15 years ago. 10 digits if you call another state.

    8 digits gives you a theoretical 100 million numbers (or 99,999,999 anyway)
    10 digits boosts that to an insane 10 billion numbers.
    That doesn't even look at the addition digits for international.
    Reply
  • eddieroolz
    Most of us in Canada have switched to 10-digit dialing already. Perhaps it's time for rest of world to follow suit.
    Reply
  • back_by_demand
    Uh, the UK has 11 digit numbers with 4 or 5 digits as a local prefix, Manchester is 0161, Derby 01332, followed by its 7 or 6 digit local number - Australia can afford to have fewer digits because it has half the population of the UK and nowhere near the number of business lines. London alone probably has more phones than Australia, same with Canada. For such a large landmasses those 2 countries are barely inhabited with less than 60 million between then.
    Reply
  • cozmium
    I used to live in Southampton which was once 0703, then 01703 in the mid 90s, then in 2000 ish, 02380. The latter was just pointlessly different. The change with adding a 1 was no problem though, and tbh they could easily just add another digit again rather than try and find more complicated solutions.
    Reply
  • __-_-_-__
    in developed countries like mine we have 9 digit numbers since 20 years ago.
    Reply
  • contentsmayvary
    People seem to be missing the point here... The UK already uses 11-digit numbers. The issue is whether you need to dial the area code or not when you are dialling a local number. Currently, you don't need to for almost all areas.
    Reply
  • contentsmayvary
    (Continued) And although the "ideal" solution would be to add a couple of digits to the front of all local numbers, that's going to be a huge logistical nightmare. Making everyone in the country change their local phone number wouldn't go down too well...
    Reply
  • back_by_demand
    Cmv, you have a brain and understand telecoms, everyone else just go back to watching American Gladiators
    Reply
  • lamorpa
    eddieroolz: "Most of us in Canada have switched to 10-digit dialing already. Perhaps it's time for rest of world to follow suit."

    Good one. "follow"? LOL.
    Reply
  • memadmax
    11204119 said:
    Most of us in Canada have switched to 10-digit dialing already. Perhaps it's time for rest of world to follow suit.

    Last I checked my phone number was #-###-###-####....
    Wow, how many numbers is that? And don't give me crap about the symbol...

    Reply