Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads

Safari and IE8 Were the First to Fall at Pwn2Own

by - source: Ars Technica

Apple's Safari browser was the first to fall at the annual Pwn2Own hacking contest taking place at the CanSecWest conference in Vancouver.

Every year, Pwn2Own sees security experts and hackers attempt to hack into machines by exploiting vulnerabilities in the computers' browsers. This year, both Apple and Google released last minute updates before the competition started. Despite this, Safari was the first to fall. Ars Technica reports that VUPEN, a French security company and the first to take a shot at Apple's browser, had gained control of the fully-patched Mac OS X 10.6.6 MacBook five seconds after the browser visited its specially-crafted web page. Despite Apple's update to Safari, the exploit still worked in version 5.0.4.

Next to go was Internet Explorer, which didn't receive an update prior to the competition. Stephen Fewer of Harmony Security managed to beat the 32-bit version of Internet Explorer 8 running on 64-bit Windows 7 Service Pack 1 using three separate vulnerabilities. Two of these were to achieve successful code execution within the browser, with the third being needed escape IE's Protected Mode sandbox. Fewer told Ars that it took him five to six weeks to put together the attack.

The hacker scheduled to take on Google’s Chrome on a Cr-48 Chrome OS notebook was a no-show.

Read more about the exploits and the hackers that beat Safari and IE8 on Ars Technica.

Share:
28
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
sabot00 03/11/2011 3:25 AM
Hide
-2+

No surprises.

kilo_17 03/11/2011 3:34 AM
Hide
-1+

It fascinates me how they can crack these browsers in seconds.

enzo matrix 03/11/2011 3:44 AM
Hide
-4+

kilo_17 :
It fascinates me how they can crack these browsers in seconds.


Why? Considering:
Fewer told Ars that it took him five to six weeks to put together the attack.

JohnnyLucky 03/11/2011 3:46 AM
Hide
-1+

Do the hackers reveal their methods?

Mr_Bojangles 03/11/2011 3:48 AM
Hide
-2+

kilo_17 :
It fascinates me how they can crack these browsers in seconds.



It fascinates me how people can take things so widely out of context. The amount of preparation is what you should look at, not the time frame from within the attack was executed.

JMcEntegart 03/11/2011 3:51 AM
Hide
-4+

kilo_17 :
It fascinates me how they can crack these browsers in seconds.



They come up with the exploits prior to the contest and then when the contest starts it's just a case of just running it. Still very impressive, though. Particularly when you consider the fact that Apple patched Safari the day before the competition. That could easily have neutralized VUPEN's exploit.

masterjaw 03/11/2011 4:19 AM
Hide
-8+

This only shows that Apple is no better than Microsoft in terms of security. The ones who claim that "Mac OS is more secure than Windows" is because of its Unix nature, not because of Apple. Heck, even Mac OS is easily defeated during hacking events.

Makes you wonder how would be our security landscape if Apple did got 70-80% of world's computing resources.

molo9000 03/11/2011 4:31 AM
Hide
-3+

These headlines are misleading!
Who falls first, second, third, etc. is all down to how the event is scheduled.

chick0n 03/11/2011 4:49 AM
Hide
-7+

masterjaw :
This only shows that Apple is no better than Microsoft in terms of security. The ones who claim that "Mac OS is more secure than Windows" is because of its Unix nature, not because of Apple. Heck, even Mac OS is easily defeated during hacking events.Makes you wonder how would be our security landscape if Apple did got 70-80% of world's computing resources.



Steve will come out and say :

"You use the internet wrong."

slothy89 03/11/2011 6:04 AM
Hide
-3+

JohnnyLucky :
Do the hackers reveal their methods?

Yes they do, to the owners of the failed software so they can patch the exploits. These guys are known as "White Hat" hackers, or Crackers.

No, they do not publish them publicly to allow "Black Hat" hackers to exploit them for malicious purposes.

This is a professional event designed to test and FIX issues with the worlds popular Browsers and OS's

bsbsbsbs 03/11/2011 6:37 AM
Hide
-1+

Can basically anything can be hacked?

Yes it can.

What was that quote from BTTF? Oh yeah, "If you put your mind to it, you can accomplish anything" Marty to George Mcfly.

jimmysmitty 03/11/2011 7:15 AM
Hide
-2+

I just wonder where IE9 and FF4.0 came in. Both are great browsers.

As for Safari, it shows just how vulnerable Mac OSX really is. Since Apple doesn't have many viruses, they don't worry about patching holes. I can imagine if a bad virus got out, a lot of Mac fans would be pissed.

But Jobes would just tell them they are using it wrong anyways.

virtualban 03/11/2011 9:41 AM
Hide
-3+

Quote :The hacker scheduled to take on Google’s Chrome on a Cr-48 Chrome OS notebook was a no-show.

Funny, and let's have a conspiracy theory about this too ;)

endgadget 03/11/2011 10:15 AM
Hide
-0+

"Safari and IE8 Were the First to Fall at Pwn2Own"

Shouldn't that be, "Safari was the first to fall at Pwn2Own"?

Pherule 03/11/2011 11:08 AM
Hide
-2+

Would be interesting to see where Firefox with Adblock/Noscript/WOT protection would come in.

house70 03/11/2011 1:39 PM
Hide
-1+

endgadget :
"Safari and IE8 Were the First to Fall at Pwn2Own"Shouldn't that be, "Safari was the first to fall at Pwn2Own"?


Yes, but that would be tantamount to admit that Safari (an Apple product) is less secure than IE8 (a Microsoft product). You will not see such a thing on certain websites, this one included.

Shodar 03/11/2011 3:06 PM
Hide
-5+

virtualban :
Funny, and let's have a conspiracy theory about this too



The hacker for Chrome must of been an no-show because he was too busy fighting off the army of Androids that Google sent out to hunt him down and "take him out".

molo9000 03/11/2011 3:08 PM
Hide
--1+

house70 :
Yes, but that would be tantamount to admit that Safari (an Apple product) is less secure than IE8 (a Microsoft product). You will not see such a thing on certain websites, this one included.


LOL
This isn't Hollywood. What the hackers do at pwn2own is execute attacks that were prepared and tested long before the event even started.
Which system falls first is determined by the organizers, who decide when a hacker gets to attack what, and has nothing whatsoever to do with security.

virtualban 03/11/2011 3:17 PM
Hide
-1+

Shodar :
The hacker for Chrome must of been an no-show because he was too busy fighting off the army of Androids that Google sent out to hunt him down and "take him out".


LOL

Anonymous 03/11/2011 5:43 PM
Hide
-0+

@molo9000

or the hacker could have failed at compromising the system, which has everything to do with security.....

falchard 03/11/2011 6:59 PM
Hide
-0+

Chrome wins with poorly written code. The hackers have difficulty understanding it, and everyone has difficulty writing programs for it.

Still this is quite an achievement for Microsoft. Safari cracked using an exploit from 5 iterations ago. IE8 requires 3 different hacks and it took weeks to develop. I am sure the same preperation would be needed for Firefox.

molo9000 03/11/2011 7:08 PM
Hide
-0+

CompleteControl :
@molo9000or the hacker could have failed at compromising the system, which has everything to do with security.....


Yes but "first to fall" is meaningless.

SteelCity1981 03/11/2011 8:52 PM
Hide
--1+

Quote :The hacker scheduled to take on Google’s Chrome on a Cr-48 Chrome OS notebook was a no-show


That's becuase some big black dressed men came to his door before hand warning him. lol

Anonymous 03/11/2011 9:07 PM
Hide
-0+

@molo9000

agreed, order of precedence has no impact what so ever, a failure is a failure no matter who goes first or last

K2N hater 03/12/2011 12:52 PM
Hide
-0+

Both Windows and MacOS are made to begineers so neither Apple nor MS care about advanced users and unusual usage. Security will never be a concern to them.

Guess why no-one complains about Linux security...

Anonymous 03/12/2011 6:53 AM
Hide
-0+

Ummm...My guess would be the like .5% market-share of Linux. I can guarantee you the Windows is far more secure than Linux.

SAL-e 03/15/2011 1:00 AM
Hide
-1+

Ralifin :
Ummm...My guess would be the like .5% market-share of Linux. I can guarantee you the Windows is far more secure than Linux.


Ummm... Most of the Internet is running on Linux servers, practically all super computers are running Linux. And in the first competition by Pwn2Own there was PC running Ubuntu. The event ended and only un-hacked computer standing was the Ubuntu PC. Just because BestBuy don't sell Linux desktops and only knowledgeable users wipe the Windows and install Linux doesn't mean that Linux is not secure. In fact Linux was first to be attacked in the past. Before hackers started hacking desktops they were targeting the servers. On server market Linux is #1. With right support from smart and knowledgeable administrators the Linux is dam difficult to crack. (not impossible of course). MS has made some great improvements to Windows, but the legacy code is still huge problem. The biggest problem is the arrogant/ignorant and border line stupid users and nobody can fix that.

eddieroolz 03/16/2011 9:20 AM
Hide
-0+

What do you expect from Apple.

Meanwhile, IE8 is, despite a lot of patches, full of holes as I see...

Ads

Best offers

Newsletters


OK
Ads