Overclocking Core 2 Duo: Power Versus Performance
Intel's fastest Core 2 Duo, the E8600, runs at 3.33 GHz. But if you're a performance-hungry power user, we found that you can actually increase the chip's efficiency by overclocking it, thanks to 45 nm manufacturing and plenty of built-in headroom. Read More
-
Intel Core i7-975 Extreme And i7-950 Reviewed
Today Intel launches two high-end processors that take the place of its i7-965 and i7-940 CPUs. More speed? Same price points? We’ll take it! But are the new chips compelling enough to warrant spending more than you would on an i7-920? Read More
-
AMD Athlon II X2 / Phenom II X2 And Low-Power CPU Bonanza
Eager to let you know it’s been busy, AMD is launching four new processors today: the first Athlon II, a dual-core Phenom II, and two low-power 65W Phenom IIs. We bought ourselves a new Pentium E6300 and let loose with AMD’s latest. Read More
All performance charts
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
Friday the 24th
Exterminate Santa Claus's elves. Use the arrows to move, S to grab the elves, and A or W to attack them with your sword.
|
kids :
Dr. Joe
You need sound to play this game. Some of these lovely animals are sick, and as a veterinarian, it is your duty to find out what is wrong with them...
|
Sponsored links
Intel's '09 Roadmap Revealed: Part 1
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (27) |
- Share
Trying to decide what your next upgrade is going to be, and when you plan on doing it? Well how about a little information that could help you decide. Just like a previous source on the AMD/ATI 2009 product roadmap we bring you the Intel product roadmap for 2009 to go along with it.
Between now and the third quarter of 2009 we can expect to see a few new releases for the desktop platform from Intel. Ranging from high-end extreme editions to base-line consumer models, we have the Bloomfield, Lynnfield and Havendale processors on the way.
To go along with these new processors users can choose from the X58, G45, G43, G41 or the Ibex Peak in late 2009. The X58 chipset providing the most options and highest performance while the Gxx series offering solutions to standard consumers and business customers with its X4500 integrated graphics solution.
Let us have a closer look at some of the more interesting details.
Bloomfield Processor Features: Based on next generation Nehalem architecture - Intel Turbo Boost Techonology* - Intel 8MB Smart Cache - Octo(8) Intel Hyper-Threading across four cores - Integrated Memory Controller – 3 channel DDR3 - Intel QuickPath Interconnect to the X58 Express Chipset - PCI Express 2.0 discrete graphics for multi-card performance (2x16 or 4x8) ATI or Nvidia - Seven new SSE4 instruction sets - Available in 2.66GHz , 2.93GHz and Extreme Edition 3.2GHz - LGA-1366 Socket Interface - Release starts late Q4-08
Lynnfield Processor: Based on next generation Nehalem architecture - Intel Turbo Boost Technology* - Octo(8) Intel Hyper-Threading across four cores - 8MB of Intel Smart Cache - Integrated Memory Controller – 2 channel DDR3 - PCI Express 2.0 discrete graphics for single or multicard performance (1x16 or 2x8) ATI or Nvidia - LGA-1366 Socket Interface - Release starts early Q3-09
Havendale Processor: Based on next generation Nehalem architecture - Intel Turbo Boost Technology* - Quad Intel Hyper-Threading across two cores - 4MB Intel Smart Cache - Integrated Memory Controller – 2 channel DDR3 - Integrated graphics or Discrete graphics support for single card performance (1x16) Nvidia or ATI - LGA-1366 Socket Interface - Release starts early Q3-09
Clarksfield Processor: Based on next generation Nahalem architecture - Octo(8) Intel Hyper-Threading technology on four cores - Intel Turbo Boost Technology* - Up to 8MB of Intel Smart Cache - Integrated Memory Controller – 2 channel DDR3 - Discrete Graphics Support for single or multi card performance (1x16 or 2x8) – Releases in late Q3-09
Auburndale Processor: Based on next generation Nehalem architecture - Quad Intel Hyper-Threading technology on two cores - Intel Turbo Boost Technology - Integrated Memory Controller – 2 channel DDR3 - Integrated Graphics or Discrete Graphics Support for single card performance (1x16) – Releases in late Q3-09
Intel Turbo Boost Technology: Intel Turbo Boost Technology dynamically increases or decreases processor performance based on demand from applications. Dynamically increases clock frequency based on available TDP headroom.
Intel Desktop Processors 2009
Bloomfield
, Lynnfield , Havendale
|
Processor |
Clock |
Cache |
Memory |
TDP |
Socket |
Cores |
Architecture |
Price |
|
Bloomfield |
3.20GHz |
8MB |
1066/ |
130W |
LGA-1366 |
4/8 |
45nm |
$999 |
|
Bloomfield |
2.93GHz |
8MB |
1066/ |
130W |
LGA-1366 |
4/8 |
45nm |
$562 |
|
Bloomfield |
2.66GHz |
8MB |
1066/ |
130W |
LGA-1366 |
4/8 |
45nm |
$284 |
|
Lynnfield |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
45nm |
TBD |
|
Havendale |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
45nm |
TBD |
Intel
Workstation & Server Processors 2009
(Xeon)Tylersburg
|
Processor |
Speed |
Cache |
TDP |
Memory |
Sockets |
Platform |
Price |
|
W5580 |
3.20GHz |
8MB |
130W |
1333MHz |
2 |
Workstation |
$1600 |
|
X5570 |
2.93GHz |
8MB |
95W |
1333MHz |
2 |
Server |
$1386 |
|
X5560 |
2.80GHz |
8MB |
95W |
1333MHz |
2 |
Server |
$1172 |
|
X5550 |
2.66GHz |
8MB |
95W |
1333MHz |
2 |
Server |
$958 |
|
E5540 |
2.53GHz |
8MB |
80W |
1066MHz |
2 |
Server |
$744 |
|
E5530 |
2.40GHz |
8MB |
80W |
1066MHz |
2 |
Server |
$530 |
|
E5520 |
2.26GHz |
8MB |
80W |
1066MHz |
2 |
Server |
$373 |
|
E5506 |
2.13GHz |
4MB |
80W |
800MHz |
2 |
Server |
$266 |
|
E5504 |
2.00GHz |
4MB |
80W |
800MHz |
2 |
Server |
$224 |
|
E5502 |
1.86GHz |
4MB |
80W |
800MHz |
2 |
Server |
$188 |
|
L5520 |
2.26GHz |
4MB |
60W |
1066MHz |
2 |
Server |
$530 |
|
L5506 |
2.13GHz |
4MB |
60W |
800MHz |
2 |
Server |
$423 |
|
W3570 |
3.20GHz |
8MB |
130W |
1333MHz |
1 |
Workstation |
$999 |
|
W3540 |
2.93GHz |
8MB |
130W |
1066MHz |
1 |
Workstation |
$562 |
|
W3520 |
2.66GHz |
8MB |
130W |
1066MHz |
1 |
Workstation |
$284 |
Along with these new enterprise roll-outs Intel will be introducing its new Itanium line named Tukwila based on the 65nm architecture this time around – a step forward from its previous 90nm architecture in the Montvale series. Not many details are available at this time regarding Tukwila except that it is due to be released around Q3 of 2009 – More details will surface as the planned release date moves in.
The new Tylersburg 5500 & 3500 series are due to start rolling out in Q1 of 2009. Pricing is yet to be determined. At the same time Intel will be discontinuing many other consumer and enterprise products throughout 2009 as well.
Part 2 to follow tomorrow!
Source : Tom's Hardware
Related news
- Get 4850 or wait for RV870? [Graphic & Displays]
- What minimum requirements do I want for gaming and watching videos? [Graphic & Displays]
- Conroe gets E4200/E6000 naming, clock speeds up to 2.66 GHz [CPU & Components]
- New GeForce GTX 260 to Feature 216 Shaders - Beats Radeon 4870 [Graphic & Displays]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!

"here is a quick End-of-Life (EOL) product break-down for both consumer desktop and enterprise workstation/server products."
Where is this elusive break-down?
As I recall, P3 was a clear winner, P4 added features that actually made performance worse, and then the mighty comeback with Core2 was more or less reverting to P3/Pentium M architecture. Now, they're once again adding all of the features of P4 to the Core2 architecture. Is there any reason to think that this won't cause the exact same problems it did last time? Atom was the first new hyperthreading cpu in a while, and TBH, the performance of it is pathetic, it doesn't bode well for Nehalem.
i will wait on official benchmarks.
It's not impossible to do multi-threaded cores properly, Sun has been doing it for years.
All we can do is start speculating....or just wait for it to come out in a few months
lots of >65W on that board...
XE 3.20GHz 8MB 1066/800 130W LGA-1366 4/8 45nm $999
W5580 3.20GHz 8MB 130W 1333MHz 2 Workstation $1600
Can anyone explain the difference between 1st and 2nd? Its just the name, right?
How about the 3rd? What does 2 sockets mean? Only 2 of these can be used per system? Does this mean that even the Xeon version of the normal processor with 1 socket can only be used one per system?
How do you make blades/farms out of these with these restrictions? How was it done until now?
No Mobile love?
When is the Mobile version of the i7 slated to come out? Part 2 perhaps?
Arent the X58, abd the G4x series 775 sockets?? well i may be not sure abt the X58 but teh G4x series have been around for a while.
Well actually that is a different story, 2 sockets or 1 means that on a single bord u can set either 1 or 2 cpus.
Tormentor22, thanks for a clear answer. I was afraid of that.
XE 3.20GHz 8MB 1066/800 130W LGA-1366 4/8 45nm $999
So why would anyone get the regular model, or the xeon model? Difference is solely in the name, not even in the price (unlike geforce/quadro)
WoOoHoOo bloomfield 4x8 pci-e, give-me give-me give-me! give-me!
Thanks for report, but am I the only one who thinks there's a lot of redundancy in all of these different processor releases? It's like the Windows Vista of processors. (Choose from 5 flavors when 2 would be enough)
Why use the same socket for a 2 and 3 channel CPU? Wouldn't the price be much lower for a smaller, less complex socket that requires only enough pins to access QPI and 2 DDR3 dimms? If the boards are compatible, I would be worried that customers will try to add memory to the third channel on the board, when its not really tied to anything at all.
8 cores, huh? That's 7 more than most applications can use.
I don't get why people start rolling out 8 cores when processors with 4 cores are still not being taken optimum advantage of (at the consumer level).
I don't get why people start rolling out 8 cores when processors with 4 cores are still not being taken optimum advantage of (at the consumer level).
The thing I use the most can use as many cores as you can fit in 2 sockets. Windows Vista Ultimate.
8 cores, huh? That's 7 more than most applications can use.I don't get why people start rolling out 8 cores when processors with 4 cores are still not being taken optimum advantage of (at the consumer level).
I agree that most of it is a waste, but when Intel can say that 25%+ of people have 4 or more core software developer will need to start doing something. Just like all new gfx cards are DX10 but not all games are. Hardware is almost always ahead of software.
The cores are pretty much the same...
W3xxx is a single socket Workstation with some RAS capability
W5xxx is a dual socket WS with more RAS capability
and the XE is a Desktop CPU with almost no RAS capability.
I'm not a big fan of the 3xxx I think its a waste of money but there is something to be said about the 5XXX Platforms. I have an HP ws6600 with 16GB memory and its absolutely GREAT. 8 Cores with 2 1333 FSB waits for nobody.
8 cores, huh? That's 7 more than most applications can use.I don't get why people start rolling out 8 cores when processors with 4 cores are still not being taken optimum advantage of (at the consumer level).
This is why the Turbo mode is so great... if you only need one core then the OS will completely turn off the other cores and overclock the one you are actually using....
I think it's funny for big corporations to continue releasing roadmaps when they have no idea what the market will be like in 6 months. I guess they are all optimistic about the next few years, though we have plenty of reason to believe the USA will be a 3rd world country for a while. Default of treasury bills coming within a year, collapse of fiat currency soon after. I used to care about my salary and moving up. Now I care more about putting every penny I can into gold and learning skills (chicks dig skills).
how 'bout those photonic processors they've got running somewhere in a secret underground lab? will 2010 be the breaktrough year?
http://img71.imageshack.us/img71/6 [...] netqm4.jpg
I think it's funny for big corporations to continue releasing roadmaps when they have no idea what the market will be like in 6 months. I guess they are all optimistic about the next few years, though we have plenty of reason to believe the USA will be a 3rd world country for a while. Default of treasury bills coming within a year, collapse of fiat currency soon after. I used to care about my salary and moving up. Now I care more about putting every penny I can into gold and learning skills (chicks dig skills).
While I agree with you that invest in gold is a great idea, how can you be sure "your" gold is actually yours. What’s preventing the government from nationalizing all privately owned gold to save the economy?
Kit has a good point about the 8 cores rubbish. It's not future proofing to get 8 cores when only 7 are used.
By the time 8 cores are used, 8core procs will be cheaper and much faster. That's like saying it's future proofing to get 3 GTX 280's in windows xp knowing full well that xp can only take proper use of 2 gfx cards.
If your like most people of us and don't use any serious multithreading apps, 8 cores is a waste of money in 2008
Kit has a good point about the 8 cores rubbish. It's not future proofing to get 8 cores when only 7 are used.
Only 1 is used. 7 are UNused. That was Kits point.
Actually i dont have detailed knowledge abt the Xeon but as it is supposed to be the difference in some parts of the internal cores, register sizes so to be able to support high memory addressing, and better cahces optimized in there speed/latency/cache size/replacement algorithems so that it would work best with the inteded to be used programs and multiprocessing. (some algorithems can be very helpful in single core but cause disasters in multi core systems)
how 'bout those photonic processors they've got running somewhere in a secret underground lab? will 2010 be the breaktrough year?
I dont believe we are even close to that, depending on an article posted here before, the US gov. is cooperating with SUN to get one, and they are not sure they would...
For my beleifs even if they were able to do it, it wont be 2010 the prime time, potonic cpus would be super extreme cpus and would start the use of after moor's law 'dies'.
You guys mention 8 cores - I do not see it in this article. I see 8 threads on four cores, but not 16 threads on 8 cores. What am I missing?
MAN, same one can tall me what is the different between
Lynnfield to Clarksfield? and between Havendale to Auburndale?