- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (38) |
- Share
Average performance is a key factor in many purchasing decisions, although we take a more balanced approach.
Asus has clear performance leadership, but is it the best motherboard choice? Let’s consider our options.
With a performance “disadvantage” of less than one-half percent, the MSI 790FX-GD70 provided superior graphics card slot spacing and overclocking compared to the M4A79T Deluxe. MSI’s motherboard is also slightly less expensive and includes several added features, such as dual-Gigabit LAN and support for three more SATA devices.
But both Asus and MSI have some trouble in the area of cable header placement, with audio and FireWire connections in the lower-rear corner that are nearly impossible to reach with the cables of top-panel ports. Additionally, both companies have neglected the stubborn Windows XP market for which floppy drives are occasionally useful, by putting the floppy header beneath the lowest expansion slot.
With a performance deficit of less than a tenth of one percent compared to MSI, the Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P also had the highest CPU overclock and the best cable header layout. The only disadvantage is its use of only two PCIe x16 slots, but the remaining slots don’t steal any pathways from the x16 slots. Thus, it could be a better board for anyone considering one or two dual-GPU graphics cards, rather than three or four single-GPU units.
Finally there’s the DFI LANParty DK 790FXB-M3H5, which is nearly average in every way except price–it’s around 20% cheaper than other 790FX Socket AM3 solutions, and could be the basis for a reduced-cost gaming system.
MSI’s best-in-class features make the 790FX-GD70 a top value among the three most expensive boards, but most of our editors would probably choose the Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P for its cable header placement.
- Advice on these 2 $500 and below builds [Homebuilt Systems]
- Help a newbie out [CPU & Components]
- Need help choosing between these 2 setups [Homebuilt Systems]
- I5 750 vs I7 920 vs amd x4 955be [Homebuilt Systems]
- Any bottlenecks? Looking for a good upgrade path. [Homebuilt Systems]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
- 1 / 2
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Motherboard Questions for Phenom II
- Help, need advice on upgrade.
- Upgrading from 939 - Should I go AM3 or AM2+ ?
- Phenom X4 9750 for $80, Good Deal?
- Phenom 2 out now !
- Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P problem
- *Guide to Choosing Parts*
- $800ish gamaing system critique
- Somone help me..please....im going to freak out...
- Looking for build advice
- Vista 64 Installation Problem
- Dragon platform advantages for ATI vs. nVidia?
Related articles
-
Roundup: Four 790FX Socket AM3 Motherboards
While most manufacturers tout the value of AMD’s latest 790GX integrated chipset, enthusiasts need the added PCI Express connectivity of 790FX for multi-card graphics configurations. We test four 790FX-based AM3 motherboards for your Phenom II processor.
-
Socket AM3: AMD's Phenom II Gets DDR3
Last month, AMD took the wraps off of its Phenom II processor, promising to complement the chip with a new socket inside Q1 of 2009. Today sees the launch of AMD's first AM3 CPUs, which get DDR3 memory support and extend backward compatibility to AM2.
-
Does 790FX + SB750 = High-End Overclocking?
AMD’s shift in focus to high-value multi-core processors has disappointed performance fanatics, but overclocking helps. We tested the company's latest enthusiast parts to find out if there are any real performance gains.
Best offers
|
P7P55D Motherboard (Intel Socket H... | $149.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
M4A785TD-V EVO Motherboard (AMD... | $99.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Motherboard (Intel Socket 478, Intel... | $31.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
|
M4A78T-E Motherboard (AMD, AM3, AMD... | $129.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
P7P55D Deluxe Motherboard (Intel... | $215.99 Directron More info |
- best motherboard for phenom ii
- floppy header
- what is best msi or gigabyte
- which is better motherboard msi or gigabyte
- overclocking msi motherboard
- top am3 motherboards
- gaming am3 motherboard compare
- top motherboards phenom
- best am3 790fx motherboard
- no floppy header on motherboard
- which is better asus or msi motherboards
- what is the best motherboard for a phenom processor
- msi motherboard connections
- msi motherboard overclock
- msi cpu overclocking
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
crazy :
Xiao Xiao 7
A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
|
i like that dial on the MSI... mmm.
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition
(2.80 GHz, 86.0 MB Cache)
I never knew any AMD processors had that much cache!
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition(2.80 GHz, 86.0 MB Cache)I never knew any AMD processors had that much cache!
Super CPU!
"Asus has clear performance leadership,..." :-)))
1.66% better than the worst performer in the tests. :-)
who said Phenom II has low cache size i think with those 86mb you can do amazing things!!
sorry about the double post but i would have liked to have seen these benchmarked with two 4870x2's... since they keep talking about them so much.
Super CPU fixed
Not much point in throwing that much GPU horsepower at a motherboard review; the card Thomas used is our current reference--and it's more than ample for showcasing the differences between these boards.
If you want to see quad-CrossFire for any specific reason, feel free to let us know and we can put together a story idea!
I think people would like to see a dual-295/dual-4870x2 series of benches if only for the "OMG BEASTLY!" factor. I dunno. XD
"Asus has clear performance leadership,..." :-)))1.66% better than the worst performer in the tests. :-)
Consistent would have been better if not for the fear of people pointing out ever tiny inconsistency. Just remember, if you're 5'11" tall it's clear to just about everyone that you're not 6'!!!
...the card Thomas used is our current reference--and it's more than ample for showcasing the differences between these boards.
Could you clarify that a bit Chris? Are you saying you would not expect any difference in crossfire between the MBs? If so, that's OK. However, if there's going to be a difference, that is the main reason to buy a 790FX. If you aren't going to crossfire might as well get a GX.
I suspect the chipset isn't the whole story and the various manufacturers could still screw up the PCI-E voltages or something
Prox,
It depends on the numbers you're looking for. I interpreted the OP's request to mean he wanted performance results with 4870 X2s, which are overkill for comparing these boards. If it's a matter of comparing PCI Express scaling (the reason for going FX instead of GX), check out this piece: http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 2095.html. It isn't on the AMD platforms, but it still illustrates fairly well how much/little performance you'd lose with PCIe 2.0 x8 vs. x16.
i think comparing dual gpu and single gpu would be a great idea... there could be inconsistency between the motherboards at crossfire setting... i mean u did test using 2 ram and 4 ram rite... and there's a difference in performance... hope this makes sense.. and yeah it's also bout the beastly impact and stuff...
I think that a quad crossfire would be of interest to a motherboard review. Just to answer questions like: Are two 4870X2 better then 4 x 4870 or 4890 or 4850? Does the PCIe pathways bottleneck (if it happens) the GPUs when running in 8x mode? How about the stability of the system with 4 physical cards instead of 2 or just 1 ... and so on.
Granted my request isn't based on the real needs of the consumer, it's more of a scientific curiosity behind it. But I remember a while back tom's had an article about nvidia's SLI with 2, 3 or 4 cards in different configurations and that was an interesting read.
PS: Just to clear something up in the 2 x 4870X2 vs. 4 x 4870 or other versions. I know that 4x4870 are more $$ then 2x4870X2 but if you buy a 4 slot PCIe motherboard what if you start out with a single 4870 or 4890 and just add in cards over the period of a year since prices change and people might not have all the cash to get 4 cards at the same time.
phenom ii out for testing tomorrow we hope
The Editor's Note kinda confirms that theory, yeah.
They are using a 260 for the video card. Will these boards SLI as well as Crossfire?
Lol, basically these guys want an article that would have taken another day or two to write, and a thick stack of video cards so they could see the performance differences between 2x 4870X2's, 4x 4870's, and then perhaps any combination of 4870's and an 8800gt thrown in the mix for physiX.
To avoid confusion with the AM2+ based 790FX boards they ought to call it 793FX or something different...
I just question why you would buy a board for AMD's spider platform,,then use a Nvidia product?? seems kinda weird to me,, if i was buying something "high end", I'm not going to buy an accessory whether it works properly or not from a competitor to complement it. I would have liked to at least see the comparison using AMD products.
If you want to see quad-CrossFire for any specific reason, feel free to let us know and we can put together a story idea!
"We guys" just made a suggestion since Chris stated he's opened to ideas. The asrock X58 article a few days back is another good example of a story that can be looked at from a more technical perspective. Since that board and these two AMD ones share 4 PCIe ports and ATI & Nvidia cards support ATI STREA/CUDA one would be inclined to have a look beyond the "can it run crysis" comment. And I'm sure finding 4 identical cards isn't an issues since the time that takes to right an article wasn't up for debate.