All about CPU
 Latest CPU articles
All CPU articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

crazy : PC Breakdown What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
kids : Bob Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
Ads

Sponsored links

Best Gaming CPU: $150-$200

Previous Next
2:00 AM - 09/01/2009 by Don Woligroski

Best gaming CPU for $170:

Phenom II X4 945

Phenom II X4 945
Codename: Deneb
Process: 45nm
CPU Cores: 4
Clock Speed:   3 GHz
Socket: AM3
L1 Cache:   4 x 128KB
L2 Cache:   4 x 512KB
L3 Cache: 6MB
HyperTransport: 4,000 MHz
Thermal Envelope:
125W

With the introduction of the Phenom II X4 965 BE, we've seen the rest of the Phenom II X4 family drop in price. Happily, the Phenom II X4 945 is now $170 and makes for an easy recommendation with its four CPU cores and high operating frequency.

Best gaming CPU for $190: 3-way Tie

Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition (Check Prices)

Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition
Codename: Deneb
Process: 45 nm
CPU Cores: 4
Clock Speed:   3.2 GHz
Socket: AM3
L1 Cache:   4 x 128KB
L2 Cache:   4 x 512KB
L3 Cache: 6MB
HyperTransport: 4,000 MHz
Thermal Envelope:
125W

The former flagship of AMD's Phenom II line, the Phenom II X4 955 BE has been relegated to second place status by the new Phenom II X4 965 BE model. However, it's hard to recommend the Phenom II X4 965 when the 955 sports the same unlocked multiplier and a $50 cheaper price tag.


Core 2 Quad Q9400 (Check Prices)

Core 2 Quad Q9400
Codename: Yorkfield
Process: 45 nm
CPU Cores: 4
Clock Speed: 2.66 GHz
Socket: LGA 775
L2 Cache: 2 x 3MB
Front Side Bus: 1,333 MHz
Thermal Envelope:
95W

The Core 2 Quad line is no slouch either, and tends to perform a little better than the Phenom II X4 when compared clock-for-clock. The Core 2 Quad Q9400 is a strong competitor for the Phenom II X4 955, and will overclock well despite its locked CPU multiplier.

Be careful once you get to this point, though. Intel's lone Core i5 processor is due in just a week and will purportedly be priced to compete under $200. If you're serious about performance, you might be better served by waiting to see how Intel's Lynnfield design fares.


Core 2 Duo E8500 (Check Prices)

Core 2 Duo E8500
Codename: Wolfdale
Process: 45nm
CPU Cores: 2
Clock Speed: 3.16 GHz
Socket: LGA 775
L2 Cache: 6MB
Front Side Bus: 1,333 MHz
Thermal Envelope:
65W

We got a lot of negative feedback for this recommendation last month, but we re-checked the data and even found more reason to support this CPU's inclusion. The Core 2 Duo E8500 is, in fact, a powerful gaming processor. Any handicaps that this CPU might have by only offering two cores is compensated for by a very high 3.16 clock speed and 6MB of L2 cache. While a quad-core CPU is probably a better bet for multi-purpose use, this Wolfdale-based processor sports a low 65 watt thermal envelope, which makes the E8500 a good choice for a low-power gaming PC or gaming HTPC.

Talkback
Proximon 09/01/2009 8:18 AM
Hide
-0+

Brave :)

I thought the flames might have scared you off.
Correction: you have E6300 in the gray area of the table for the E5300.

Cleeve 09/01/2009 8:31 AM
Hide
-0+

Heheh. Nah, I don't frighten easy. :)

Thanks, I'll look into that.

falchard 09/01/2009 8:47 AM
Show
megamanx00 09/01/2009 8:51 AM
Hide
-0+

I like that the E8500 made a showing. I wonder how this picture will change once the LGA1156 CPUs are widely available. It's too bad that AMD can't really compete in the +$200 market right now.

Cleeve 09/01/2009 9:00 AM
Hide
-14+

falchard :
I fail to see the point of a gaming CPU. Beyond a certain point the difference in performance is under 1 frame.



Not true at all. Depends on the game, and wether or not that game is bottlenecked by the graphics card or CPU.

Frankly, I've been seeing a *lot* more CPU-limited games during my benchmarking over the past year.

FallenSniper 09/01/2009 9:17 AM
Hide
-9+

Man I wish the Core 2 Quad prices were just a little lower

rambo117 09/01/2009 9:22 AM
Hide
-6+

great review! much better than the first one IMO.
i liked that you thought about us OCers this time ;)

dirtmountain 09/01/2009 9:55 AM
Hide
-3+

Yup, great review, good job.

barmaley 09/01/2009 10:54 AM
Show
sudeshc 09/01/2009 11:00 AM
Hide
-0+

Nice review, need i thought phenom 2 965 could be compared to Core 2 Quad Q9650 but seems i was wrong.

alikum 09/01/2009 11:23 AM
Hide
-0+

I like the fact that you mention LGA775 chips, and perhaps that would be the last time they're up on the list as they are getting phased out.

eddieroolz 09/01/2009 12:09 PM
Hide
-0+

Too bad Core 2 Quads are still rather expensive for the performance. I guess my E7200 will just have to live on for another two years.

Good article, by the way!

masterjaw 09/01/2009 12:20 PM
Hide
-1+

The results are far better than the first one. Taking overclock-ability into consideration is good especially for the enthusiasts. Kudos!

enewmen 09/01/2009 12:45 PM
Hide
-0+

"The motherboards and DDR3 RAM that the i7 architecture requires will bring the total platform cost higher than other systems, but the resulting performance should be worth the purchase price."

Agree.
I was hoping the author will focus a little more on the total system cost than just the CPU cost. This is the main reason why I got the q9550 and not the i7. But that was 6 months ago, maybe now the motherboard and DDR3 isn't as big a factor anymore. I'm also guessing min specs of games and apps in 4 years won't specify C2Q and i7 - just something like Min specs: Intel or AMD Quad/Hex/Oct core - 2.5+ Ghz.

my

Anonymous 09/01/2009 12:57 PM
Hide
-11+

Some people think every one lives next to a Microcenter.

Anonymous 09/01/2009 1:09 PM
Hide
-0+

Even though theese processors have been tested thoroughly before, but not necessarily against each other with latest drives, patches and whatnot, so some charts with a few game tests would make the article much more informative.

snotling 09/01/2009 2:22 PM
Show
Pei-chen 09/01/2009 2:34 PM
Hide
-3+

The monthly update of the same thing is getting bored. Thanks god next gen is just around the corner and we'll see some big performance gain.

Can you believe what computer gaming would be like if that that crack from id's opinion is real; graphic hardware hit a wall and future improvement is on console.

wicko 09/01/2009 3:05 PM
Hide
-0+

Why did you guys not wait for the Lynnfield NDA to lift when it is being released in < 1 week?

joesapp37 09/01/2009 3:29 PM
Hide
-3+

wicko :
Why did you guys not wait for the Lynnfield NDA to lift when it is being released in < 1 week?



Because we like to party every end of the month!


Sponsored links

Related articles

  • Best gaming CPU for $280: Core i7-920 (Check Prices) Core i7 920 Codename: Nehalem Process: 45 nm CPU Cores: 4 Clock Speed: 2.66 GHz Socket: LGA 1366 L2 Cache: 4 x 256 KB L3 Cache:   8 MB QuickPath Interconnect (QPI): 4.8 GT/sThermal...

  • Best gaming CPU for $120: Phenom II X3 710 (Check Prices) Phenom II X3 710 Codename: Heka Process: 45 nm CPU Cores: 3 Clock Speed: 2.6 GHz Socket: AM3 L1 Cache: 3x 128 KB L2 Cache: 3x 512 KB L3 Cache: 6 MB HyperTransport: 4,000 MHzThermal...

  • Best gaming CPU for $50: Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Check Prices) Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Codename: Brisbane Process: 65 nm CPU Cores: 2 Clock Speed: 2.7 GHz Socket: AM2 L1 Cache: 2 x 128 KB L2 Cache: 2 x 512 KB HyperTransport: 2,000 MHzThermal...