Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: August '09

2:00 AM - 09/01/2009 by Don Woligroski

If you don’t have the time to research the benchmarks, or if you don’t feel confident enough in your ability to pick the right processor for your next gaming machine, fear not. We at Tom’s Hardware have come to your aid with a simple list of the best gaming CPUs offered for the money.

Our Second Gaming CPU for the Money Article

In our first Best Gaming CPU for the Money article, we tried to keep things as objective as possible by basing recommendations completely on comparison data instead of our opinions. Unfortunately, the best data we could muster was a fairly small sample size of four games run continuously in our own labs. In addition, it appears that our Athlon II X2 CPU performance data was a little pessimistic.

As a result, we'll be opening this month's column up to more subjective opinion and experience. Hopefully, this counterbalances the possibility of recommendations based on apps highly optimized for one architecture or another. Thus, you'll see us adding to and modifying some of the picks. Having said that, if you purchased a CPU using last month's article, then fear not. Those choices remain valid and defensible. This time around we're simply adding some price points and making extra recommendations for outstanding overclockers.

With regard to new additions, the past month saw AMD introduce its Phenom II 965 BE, though it doesn't offer too much excitement other than a slight clock speed bump over the 955 model in the company's Phenom II series. More interesting are the lowered prices across the rest of the Phenom II X4 line, making the Phenom II X4 955 and 945 models more attractive from a value standpoint.

As far as Intel, everyone is waiting for the new Core i5 CPUs to show up, which look like they are going to give the existing Core 2 Quad and Phenom IIs a good run for their money. We've already wrapped up our performance testing and are comfortable recommending that performance enthusiasts with mid-range budgets will want to see what Intel's latest efforts yield. It'll only be a week's wait, we promise!

Some Notes About Our Recommendations

This list is for gamers who want to get the most for their money. If you don’t play games, then the CPUs on this list may not be suitable for your particular needs.

The criteria to get on this list are strictly price/performance. We acknowledge that there are other factors that come into play, such as platform price or CPU overclockability, but we're not going to complicate things by factoring in motherboard costs. We may add honorable mentions for outstanding products in the future, though. For now, our recommendations are based on stock clock speeds and performance at that price.

Cost and availability change on a daily basis. We can’t offer up-to-the-minute accurate pricing information in the text, but we can list some good chips that you probably won’t regret buying at the price ranges we suggest (and our PriceGrabber-based engine will help track down some of the best prices for you).

The list is based on some of the best U.S. prices from online retailers. In other countries or at retail stores, your mileage will most certainly vary. Of course, these are retail CPU prices while we do not list used or OEM CPUs.


Talkback
Proximon 09/01/2009 8:18 AM
Hide
-0+

Brave :)

I thought the flames might have scared you off.
Correction: you have E6300 in the gray area of the table for the E5300.

Cleeve 09/01/2009 8:31 AM
Hide
-0+

Heheh. Nah, I don't frighten easy. :)

Thanks, I'll look into that.

falchard 09/01/2009 8:47 AM
Show
megamanx00 09/01/2009 8:51 AM
Hide
-0+

I like that the E8500 made a showing. I wonder how this picture will change once the LGA1156 CPUs are widely available. It's too bad that AMD can't really compete in the +$200 market right now.

Cleeve 09/01/2009 9:00 AM
Hide
-14+

falchard :
I fail to see the point of a gaming CPU. Beyond a certain point the difference in performance is under 1 frame.



Not true at all. Depends on the game, and wether or not that game is bottlenecked by the graphics card or CPU.

Frankly, I've been seeing a *lot* more CPU-limited games during my benchmarking over the past year.

FallenSniper 09/01/2009 9:17 AM
Hide
-9+

Man I wish the Core 2 Quad prices were just a little lower

rambo117 09/01/2009 9:22 AM
Hide
-6+

great review! much better than the first one IMO.
i liked that you thought about us OCers this time ;)

dirtmountain 09/01/2009 9:55 AM
Hide
-3+

Yup, great review, good job.

barmaley 09/01/2009 10:54 AM
Show
sudeshc 09/01/2009 11:00 AM
Hide
-0+

Nice review, need i thought phenom 2 965 could be compared to Core 2 Quad Q9650 but seems i was wrong.

alikum 09/01/2009 11:23 AM
Hide
-0+

I like the fact that you mention LGA775 chips, and perhaps that would be the last time they're up on the list as they are getting phased out.

eddieroolz 09/01/2009 12:09 PM
Hide
-0+

Too bad Core 2 Quads are still rather expensive for the performance. I guess my E7200 will just have to live on for another two years.

Good article, by the way!

masterjaw 09/01/2009 12:20 PM
Hide
-1+

The results are far better than the first one. Taking overclock-ability into consideration is good especially for the enthusiasts. Kudos!

enewmen 09/01/2009 12:45 PM
Hide
-0+

"The motherboards and DDR3 RAM that the i7 architecture requires will bring the total platform cost higher than other systems, but the resulting performance should be worth the purchase price."

Agree.
I was hoping the author will focus a little more on the total system cost than just the CPU cost. This is the main reason why I got the q9550 and not the i7. But that was 6 months ago, maybe now the motherboard and DDR3 isn't as big a factor anymore. I'm also guessing min specs of games and apps in 4 years won't specify C2Q and i7 - just something like Min specs: Intel or AMD Quad/Hex/Oct core - 2.5+ Ghz.

my

Anonymous 09/01/2009 12:57 PM
Hide
-11+

Some people think every one lives next to a Microcenter.

Anonymous 09/01/2009 1:09 PM
Hide
-0+

Even though theese processors have been tested thoroughly before, but not necessarily against each other with latest drives, patches and whatnot, so some charts with a few game tests would make the article much more informative.

snotling 09/01/2009 2:22 PM
Show
pei-chen 09/01/2009 2:34 PM
Hide
-3+

The monthly update of the same thing is getting bored. Thanks god next gen is just around the corner and we'll see some big performance gain.

Can you believe what computer gaming would be like if that that crack from id's opinion is real; graphic hardware hit a wall and future improvement is on console.

wicko 09/01/2009 3:05 PM
Hide
-0+

Why did you guys not wait for the Lynnfield NDA to lift when it is being released in < 1 week?

joesapp37 09/01/2009 3:29 PM
Hide
-3+

wicko :
Why did you guys not wait for the Lynnfield NDA to lift when it is being released in < 1 week?



Because we like to party every end of the month!


Sponsored links

Related articles

  • Best gaming CPU for $280: Core i7-920 (Check Prices) Core i7 920 Codename: Nehalem Process: 45 nm CPU Cores: 4 Clock Speed: 2.66 GHz Socket: LGA 1366 L2 Cache: 4 x 256 KB L3 Cache:   8 MB QuickPath Interconnect (QPI): 4.8 GT/sThermal...

  • Best gaming CPU for $120: Phenom II X3 710 (Check Prices) Phenom II X3 710 Codename: Heka Process: 45 nm CPU Cores: 3 Clock Speed: 2.6 GHz Socket: AM3 L1 Cache: 3x 128 KB L2 Cache: 3x 512 KB L3 Cache: 6 MB HyperTransport: 4,000 MHzThermal...

  • Best gaming CPU for $50: Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Check Prices) Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Codename: Brisbane Process: 65 nm CPU Cores: 2 Clock Speed: 2.7 GHz Socket: AM2 L1 Cache: 2 x 128 KB L2 Cache: 2 x 512 KB HyperTransport: 2,000 MHzThermal...

All about CPU
 Latest CPU articles
All CPU articles
 CPU performance charts
All performance charts
 Latest CPU news
All CPU news

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

Ads

Sponsored links