- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (9) |
- Share
Turion 64 X2 Memory Speeds Vary!
As the memory clock speed of AMD64 processors is derived by dividing the core clock speed by an integer, you can calculate the effective memory clock speed yourself. Remember to double the result, as the memory runs at double data rate mode and transfers twice the amount of data via the interface.
| Processor | Core Clock Speed | Memory Divider | Memory Clock Speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turion 64 X2 TL-56 | 1800 MHz | 6 | 300 MHz (DDR2-600) |
| Turion 64 X2 TL-60 | 2000 MHz | 6 | 333 MHz (DDR2-667) |
| Turion 64 X2 TL-62 | 2100 MHz | 7 | 300 MHz (DDR2-600) |
| Turion 64 X2 TL-64 | 2200 MHz | 7 | 314 MHz (DDR2-628) |
| Turion 64 X2 TL-66 | 2300 MHz | 7 | 328 MHz (DDR2-656) |
| Turion 64 X2 TL-68 | 2400 MHz | 8 | 300 MHz (DDR2-600) |
There are some processor models whose memory runs up to 10% slower than the rated maximum of 333 MHz (DDR2-667). In the case of the Turion 64 X2 TL-56, TL-62 and TL-68; the maximum memory clock speed can only be 300 MHz (DDR2-600), because any other divider would result in a clock speed that is beyond the specified maximum of DDR2-667. If you have to decide between a TL-62 (2.1 GHz and DDR2-600) and a TL-60 (2.0 GHz and DDR2-667), we recommend going for the latter, as you won’t really notice the 100 MHz difference unless you intend to use the notebook for processor-intensive tasks.
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- What computers did you own in the old days? Share your story!
- Core 2 duo vs Quad Core Help Please
- When is 4mb L2 necessary over 2mb of L2 cache?
- Whats the fastest socket 479 CPU for my HP nc8000 notebook laptop
- Dual Core Notebook CPUs Explored
- Sony Vaio SZ - overclock the GPU - How to?
- Dell Notebook Overclocking...
- cool n quiet?
- new AMD X2 3800+ Koolance rig is up and running!
- overclocking laptop cpu or graphics card
- HP says 2gig max
- The Graphics State of the Union
- need suggestions for testbed setup for notebook components
- Clevo 4xx series compatible motherboard
Best offers
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor... | $349.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad... | $185.00 Newegg.com More info |
|
Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Quad... | $169.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
Core i7-860 Quad Core Processor... | $279.99 Newegg.com More info |
- upcoming amd processors
- turion 64 x2 tl 56
- upcoming amd cpu
- turion tl56
- intel processors overview
- laptop cpu charts
- amd® turion™ 64 x2 tl60 dual core processor 2.0 ghz vs intel
- amd processor models
- tl56
- amd notebook cpu
- overview of processor
- turion 64 x2 tl 60
- turion 64 x2 speed
- notebook processors overview
- overview processors
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
violent :
More Mindless Violence
Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
|
So if this is an updated mobile cpu chart, where are the T8100's T9300's?
45nm is the way to go on laptops
I also miss some processor in the T5000 series, because they are very common in low-end laptops. Good work anyway!
I too am very dissapointed that your mobile CPU chart doesn't inlcude the T5000 series of processors from Intel. I realize that everyone wants to see the "high end", but some of want to compare it to the low end as well.
I just purchased an HP 17" laptop and was trying to find some data on the T5000 processors because that is what comes stock on the model I purchased. I wanted to see if it was really worth it to spend the extra ~$200 to upgrade to the T9000 processors. I had to look elsewhere to get that kind of comparrison.
To bad for Toms' sites, I found another reputable site that I will now use as a reference tool. Shame on Tom's for not covering the mid and low range products.
65nm Turion X2's support DDR2-800. Why wasn't this speed used instead of DDR2-667?
toms you are no1 but you need more laptop cpu and gpu charting.
Wow, I knew my TL-60 was pathetic but I never realized just how much
I like the charts, I like the interactivity and I love that we can compare mobile and desktop CPUs. I just wish mine didn't rank so low.
Copying an earlier comment, these charts need many more chips on them. I just bought an otherwise screaming laptop with an 8800M GTS GPU but only T5550 CPU, and want to know how much improvement I'd get moving up to a T8xxx or T9xxx.
Plus in general I miss how the charts used to allow highlighting of specific processors for easier comparison.
Tom's used to be number 1. They are jut OK now. If you don't know more than the authors and are not able to independently screen the information you can't trust the data or conclusions at Tom's anymore
Copying an earlier comment, these charts need many more chips on them. I just bought an otherwise screaming laptop with an 8800M GTS GPU but only T5550 CPU, and want to know how much improvement I'd get moving up to a T8xxx or T9xxx.Plus in general I miss how the charts used to allow highlighting of specific processors for easier comparison.
That's a bit pointless why review lots when the few they have are done poorly anyway.
Whats the point of adding these benchmarks without demonstrating that your Notebook battery will last - less, more or the same between models/price/performance.
Tom's grab a load meter and find the DC power load of each of these processors on your Solar Power equipment (direct DC input not AC PSU, to emulated a Notebook Battery).
1. record peak and typical power in "each & every" application/benchmark
2. record power consumption at system IDLE