Best offers
|
GeForce GTX 295 Video Card (1.75GB,... | $549.99 Dell Home More info |
|
GeForce GTX 260 Video Card (896MB,... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GeForce 9800 GTX Video Card (512MB,... | $230.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
|
GeForce GTX 285 Video Card (1GB,... | $279.99 Best Buy More info |
|
GeForce GTX 260 Video Card (896MB,... | $229.99 STAPLES More info |
- express card graphic card
- what s the best non pci express graphics card
- pci express graphics cards
- modern graphic cards
- which graphics card will need pci express x16 bandwidth
- is pci express faster than agp 8x
- is pci express 4x faster than agp
- how hard drives affect graphics
- intel s advertising strategy
Partners
The Games selection
adventure :
Ray
Adventure game, South Park style. Pick the way the story goes by picking an answer among those offered.
|
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
Sponsored links
The reason why there isn't more of a performance payoff is simple. Games are designed in such a way that they don't send more data to the graphics card than the AGP bus can handle. Otherwise, there would be noticeable stuttering in games. On top of that, the amount of memory found on modern graphics cards (up to 256 MB) makes it completely unnecessary to page out data such as textures to the system memory via AGP. In all likelihood, this won't change with PCI Express either. After all, the 4 GB/s it offers seem positively tiny compared to the 30 GB/s of bandwidth that today's top-of-the-line cards can support internally. In short, swapping out data to system memory, either by AGP or PCI Express, simply doesn't make a lot of sense.
If you twiddle with the performance-graph feature implemented in NVIDIAs latest non-WHQL driver v55.56 you can see Nascar Thunder 2004 as one of the most texture and geometry intensive games today. But even this game does not address more than 64 MB of memory in 1600x1200. We also ran AGP 4x / 8x tests in this game - we found no differences!
So why do we need PCI Express for graphics? Well, for one thing, it's new, and, as the PR departments of all of our favorite companies never tire of telling us: newer equals better. Prepare to hear this a lot in the future - it will probably be the main advertising strategy for this new technology. That's not to say that PCI Express cards won't be faster than their AGP counterparts - they probably will be. The question is how big this margin will turn out to be.
Based on our AGP measurements above, which are admittedly hard to apply to this scenario, we shouldn't expect to see dramatic improvements - "incremental" would probably be the better adjective here. Whether and to what extent this will change in the future largely depends on how quickly PCI Express gains market (and consumer) acceptance. As always, when there is more bandwidth available, developers will find a way to put it to good use, driving the technology into the mainstream. Which brings us back to the future perspective.
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- The Dual-Core vs. Quad-Core debate
- AMD-ATI seek shareholders agreement for Merger on Monday!!
- Jump on AM2?
- Should I go Dual Core?
- First Time Builder
- Cross post for info from any dedicated OC'ers out there
- Can Ageia's PhysX Card Bring Real-World Physics to Games?
- Asus A8V Deluxe
- 4870 single, CF, vs. 260/280 single, SLI - What is the > value?
- PC based workstation (mid range) LONG POST
- New Budgetish PC
- New Rig, Demanding Needs! Critiques very welcome! (detailed)
- Conroe system
- CONTROLLING DRIVE LETTERS: At the BIOS level? Somewhere el..





