Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 Review: Samsung's Second-Child Syndrome

Does Samsung's New Galaxy Tab 10.1 Measure Up?

Our chief complaint about the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 is its disappointing performance. Last year’s Galaxy Tab 10.1 impressed us with a combination of the Tegra 2 SoC, an incredibly vivid display, and its Android 3.2 (Honeycomb) operating system. Back then, Samsung was pushing forward in a big way. In comparison, the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 feels like one feeble step forward and two big steps back.

Yes, the newer Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 enjoys Google's Android 4.0.3 (Ice Cream Sandwich) operating system. Under the tablet's hood, however, is an older and slower TI OMAP 4430. This is the same hardware powering Amazon's Kindle Fire, a tablet that also failed to impress up with its performance. The SoC's competitive disadvantage to alternatives like Tegra 3 becomes evident in everyday use, and is impossible to ignore.

Perhaps more jarring is that the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 features an LCD panel that would have been much more impressive a year ago. But in today's tablet market, the newest iPad and Google's Nexus 7 are far more attractive. Before the third-gen iPad emerged, Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 was unquestionably the best-looking tablet. It clearly dominated the Android-based competition with a SuperPLS screen. Although it's comparable to other tablet displays in its segment, the fact that the Galaxy Tab 2 uses a more generic display does not impress us.

Are performance and screen quality deal-breakers? Not necessarily. But we can't help but feel as though the Galaxy Tab 2 isn't much of an upgrade to last year's model, especially with competition from Apple and Google winning our hearts at the 9.7" and 7" display sizes. With that said, Samsung seems to be repositioning its tablet line-up with the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1's introduction. The Galaxy Note 10.1 assumes the high-end position with a $499 (16 GB) price tag, while the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 weighs in $100 cheaper, even with the same built-in storage capacity.

The Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 faces strong competition at its $400 price point, though. Apple's iPad 2 and the Transformer Pad TF300 are still compelling alternatives. Moreover, we can't forget the awesome Nexus 7, also armed with 16 GB, selling for a modest $249. Samsung is wielding a knife in this gunfight. The Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 is a competent tablet. But in today's third-gen market, it's hampered by mediocre performance, a merely acceptable screen, and a price tag that's too high. Sure, the Nexus 7 "only" comes with a seven-inch screen. But if Samsung wants to dominate the budget tablet category with its second-gen Galaxy Tab, the affordable Google tablet could be its biggest competition.

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
48 comments
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • Honestly I was extremely surprised that Samsung didn't significantly beef up on Hardware specs.
    When I saw it on the shelves I thought the store clerks labeled the specs wrong.

    To my horror, they were correct.
    I don't know what the hell Samsung was thinking, if they were purposely pulling that stunt so that the Galaxy Note 10.1" would look more appealing they sure succeeded but sadly for them, I snagged a Nexus 7 earlier on.
    18
  • correction: at the end of the conclusion it says "Moreover, we can't forget the awesome Nexus 7, also armed with 16 GB, selling for a modest $149", this should be $249.
    10
  • Other Comments
  • Honestly I was extremely surprised that Samsung didn't significantly beef up on Hardware specs.
    When I saw it on the shelves I thought the store clerks labeled the specs wrong.

    To my horror, they were correct.
    I don't know what the hell Samsung was thinking, if they were purposely pulling that stunt so that the Galaxy Note 10.1" would look more appealing they sure succeeded but sadly for them, I snagged a Nexus 7 earlier on.
    18
  • ahahah is the time when i say... "those specs were in my brick phone back in 1995! Fail Samsung"
    -9
  • correction: at the end of the conclusion it says "Moreover, we can't forget the awesome Nexus 7, also armed with 16 GB, selling for a modest $149", this should be $249.
    10
  • I think Samsung went easy on the hardware so people buy the Note 10.1.

    The Tab 2 should be seen as a budget tablet, and the Note should be seen as a high-end tablet.
    3
  • It's very hard to log in to Tom's Hardware using a Nexus. Seeing how some of the writers are fans, you'd think they'd notice a thing like that.
    1
  • So who would buy this? Why did they bother with re-doing the hardware... might as well stuck on 4.0 on the previous model.
    3
  • pckitty4427I think Samsung went easy on the hardware so people buy the Note 10.1. The Tab 2 should be seen as a budget tablet, and the Note should be seen as a high-end tablet.


    That'd be a better way of looking at this if this new Galaxy Tab was priced more modestly. At this price, is is not a good deal. It's not horrible, but this is disappointing. It is only $100 cheaper than the Note, but it has maybe half of the CPU performance (if that) and is otherwise disappointing in a variety of other ways.
    2
  • Instead of half-baking the Tab 2 they should improve the Tab 1 experience, which is woefully inadequate: I just contacted Samsung support which confirmed that even 1 year after launch there is still a problem connecting GT-P7500's to PC's using Samsung KIES (BTW never rooted it!!!). Result is I'm still on android 3.1. Over the air update does not seem to work either. Also, they could not confirm ICS updates, and even hinted that there may never be one! As a customer I feel seriously let down, shame on Samsung!
    4
  • killerclickIt's very hard to log in to Tom's Hardware using a Nexus. Seeing how some of the writers are fans, you'd think they'd notice a thing like that.


    What is difficult about it? I have no trouble on my Android phones, but I don't have a Nexus of any kind, so I'm not sure if they have some sort of problem with Tom's that I'm not aware of.
    -1
  • blazorthonWhat is difficult about it? I have no trouble on my Android phones, but I don't have a Nexus of any kind, so I'm not sure if they have some sort of problem with Tom's that I'm not aware of.


    When I try to leave comment when not signed in, the form asking for my username and password is being incorrectly repositioned, and on the Nexus (but not on Gingerbread), the focus is being returned to the username field after every keypress even if I'm trying to enter the password.
    0
  • killerclickWhen I try to leave comment when not signed in, the form asking for my username and password is being incorrectly repositioned, and on the Nexus (but not on Gingerbread), the focus is being returned to the username field after every keypress even if I'm trying to enter the password.


    Did you try using a different browser and/or making sure that you're viewing the desktop, not mobile, version of Tom's?
    0
  • If you walk into a store you'll see Samsung's tablet still has vastly superior screen. That including alternatives with higher resolution.
    2
  • I just (2 days ago) received the N7 16 GB tablet. Compared to older tablets it is the first one that I would consider to be a serious contender, if not altogether better than the iPad. JB is smoother than ICS (I also have the Samsung GSIII) but, because it lacks flash support has its own downside.

    I'm sure that the 10" form factor has its uses, but the 7" screen of the SGIII is much more comfortable to hold withone hand to watch video and/or websurf.

    I looked at the Fire HD before settling on the N7, and rejected it because of the form factor (it isn't comfortable to hold in one hand) and the conscription to the Amazon eco-system under a heavily modded ICS.

    While I am not enamoured of Google Play, it is more open than either Amazon or ios. The fact that much of Amazon's content can be played on the N7, while the Fire HD has difficulties with native android apps is another reason that I think that the N7 is the major challenger to the iPad.

    It would have been ni8ce to see Samsung offer a better, more competative, tablet. From this review it looks like Samsung put out the Tab2 as a stop-gap, and not a real competator.
    2
  • I'll never understand how Samsung manages to obtains such decent market shares and profits!
    There are a few companies like Asus for example who "think different". They take the risk of proposing products that are either original or either well built or cheap (sometimes both in the same product)... but Samsung has absolutely nothing special to offer and yes, their tablets are pale copies of the iPad. Don't get me wrong, I hate Apple's methods (and I am not so convinced by their products), but Samsung is even worse and clearly not here to save us from the evil Apple: they just make huge margins by selling us overpriced and uninspired stuff backed by some good marketing.
    4
  • This article is a bit disappointing. Not very thorough.
    IR blaster for a wicked universal remote with TouchSquid: Galaxy Tab 2 10.1: yes Nexus 7: no
    HDMI output: Galaxy Tab 2 10.1: yes Nexus 7: no
    MicroSDHC slot with 64GB card support: Galaxy Tab 2: yes Nexus 7: no
    Jelly bean? Reliable reports have it coming out very soon for the Galaxy Tab 2 and Galaxy S III.

    It is great to be excited about the Nexus 7. It is a fine device.
    These are like two women, beautiful for different reasons.
    3
  • Samsung really screwed up the Tab 2 didn´t they?? Cause this one is really their fault, guess they thought that after Apple´s lawsuit everyone would buy their products just to be against Apple. Sorry Samung, you need to put more effort on your products, especially with the actual competition
    1
  • thomasjm52ahahah is the time when i say... "those specs were in my brick phone back in 1995! Fail Samsung"


    That's one hell of a brick you had back then :-)
    4
  • blazorthonDid you try using a different browser and/or making sure that you're viewing the desktop, not mobile, version of Tom's?



    These are good recommendations, and they do work, but it would be nice if the stock browser displayed properly. Not sure why someone down voted you, but I gave you a thumb for it.
    0
  • The aspect ratios in the chart were strange. One was a reduced fraction and the other was not, they should have been the same.

    Either:
    16:10 and 16:12 or,
    8:5 and 4:3
    -1
  • Problem with all 16GB Nexus 7 tablets (besides you only really have about 12GB to use) - is that when you have less than 3 and especially 2GB of memory left, the performance becomes too slow to operate.

    I think adding memory may help... so store all photos and media on an SD Card.
    -2