



As we start in with our synthetics, the differences between these two mobile platforms is immediately apparent. The PCMark Vantage Overall suite score quite obviously favors Intel’s Arrandale processor. The Memories, TV and Movies, and Productivity suite scores follow suit, though not quite to the same degree.



We already know that there’s often little correlation between synthetic measurements of arithmetic/multimedia performance and real-world metrics. But Sandra 2010 nevertheless demonstrates a notable advantage in favor of Intel’s Arrandale-based Core i5-540M.
Most interesting is the memory bandwidth, which tells us that the on-package memory controller is enabling significantly more throughput than GM45’s memory controller. Of course, this is less bandwidth than you’d get from the Mobile Core i7-920XM, which includes an on-die (versus on-package) memory controller.
- Introduction
- The Arrandale Lineup: Something For (Almost) Everyone
- On-Package Graphics: Arrandale Versus Clarkdale
- Mobile Chipsets, Refreshed
- Asus' K42F Calpella-Based Notebook
- Test Setups And Software
- Benchmark Results: Synthetics
- Benchmark Results: Gaming And 3DMark Vantage
- Benchmark Results: Media/Transcoding Apps
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Power Consumption
- MobileMark 2007
- Conclusion
Performance is good but I'm hoping for a viable update to the CULV offerings of yesterday.
Keep it up intel. I do hope that AMD will release some new chips that will be able to compete with intel offerings.
That chops them completely out of the mobile graphics market for the masses ... Intel will pay the RIGHT OEM's some "adjustment" just to make sure their "Strategy" is right to ensure AMD's mobile market is thin and restricted to the backwaters of Bejjing.
Have a look at Page 8, where HD Graphics is compared to the previous-generation GMA in Vantage and WoW. You're not going to get much else out of this, to be honest...
Also the integrated graphics can barely match the 9400m that is 1-2 years old.
The battery life is the same or worse...
What is so great about this chip?
Personally I'm not at all impressed and find it a step side ways or even backwards.
The integrated graphics do suck, but at least now we have a choice in some laptops where we can switch from the integrated to dedicated, saving battery life when needed and boosting performance where needed. It adds flexibility basically, I'm sure Intel was aiming more for that rather than performance in 3D games.
What I really want to see is the ULV versions of this chip. I'm hoping whenever they start coming out, it'll push down the prices of older Ultra-Portable laptops around the 12-14" sizes. Certain ones with the C2D SU7300 and 4GB of RAM can be found for around $550 today. If these prices go down far enough, netbookks will be obsolete in my mind.
http://www.beste-deutsche-casinos.de/