Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Signin with

Gaming And PCMark Vantage Results

by

Game Benchmarks


The game benchmarks all show small performance improvements if faster and quicker memory is used. However, DDR3-1600 does not provide the extra bang you would expect. In fact, DDR3-1333 and other settings with low latency settings prove to be the best for games.

PCMark Vantage Results

The PCMark Vantage memory test results are close to what we found with the synthetic benchmarks, and the overall result reflects everyday performance: there is very little difference between the fastest and the slowest memory configuration.

Share:
40
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
judeh101 06/04/2009 6:36 AM
Show
cangelini 06/04/2009 6:50 AM
Hide
-6+

judeh101 :
DDR3 memory scaling on AMD's Phenom II X4, why don't cha do one for Intel as well? I'd love to see the performance on the Core i7 platform



It's coming!

judeh101 06/04/2009 7:17 AM
Show
cangelini 06/04/2009 7:45 AM
Hide
-0+

Much thanks judeh, I appreciate your feedback!

Best,
Chris

Antman56 06/04/2009 7:59 AM
Hide
-6+

The real trick to seeing a greater discrepancy between different clock speed memory(s) could be done by overclocking the CPU-NB. Using SiSoftware Sandra, I get 13.2 GB/s with DDR2 @ 1066 MHz (5-5-5-15) on a 3.4 GHz Phenom II 940 X4 with a 2.4 GHz CPU-NB.

Overclocking that Integrated Memory Controller is key!

...Just a suggestion :p

empstar 06/04/2009 8:34 AM
Hide
--2+

why always missing something..... where's the DDR2 RAM ?? should include in the chart!! very disappointed.

EQPlayer 06/04/2009 8:47 AM
Hide
-0+

Yarr, good point. Overclocking the CPU/NB on these chips seems to have nearly (well that might be a bit of an exaggeration) as much of an effect as overclocking the CPU itself.

DjEaZy 06/04/2009 9:25 AM
Hide
--1+

... it is getting better and better with TOM's... more information to compare... for the last month it's enjoyable to read...

anonymous 06/04/2009 10:16 AM
Hide
-0+

Why you didn't have tried a 'synchronized' configuration with base clock, north-bridge, memory and cpu core running on integer or semi-integer divisors ? like 266MHz base clock, 1068 MHz memory clock, 2136 MHz north bridge & HT clock and 3199 core clock.
This configuration is possible even with DDR2, with lower latencies memories and is much closer to the DDR3/1333 configuration than you think.

cinergy 06/04/2009 10:43 AM
Hide
-2+

Very nice bench for AMD people.

apache_lives 06/04/2009 10:59 AM
Show
apache_lives 06/04/2009 11:04 AM
Hide
--1+

and this is the same old picture - mainstream ram has always been the best price:performance, no point in chancing extreme memory, and "high end" memory is only good for overclocking etc

chripuck 06/04/2009 11:47 AM
Hide
--1+

apache_lives :
and this is the same old picture - mainstream ram has always been the best priceerformance, no point in chancing extreme memory, and "high end" memory is only good for overclocking etc



I wouldn't call the two top performers mainstream... with those timings there at least a step above main stream. Now to your point they're definately not the top of the line, but anyone with a clue about electronics knows the best bang for your buck is never the cheapest and never the most expensive... the sweet spot is always in the middle.

Kill@dor 06/04/2009 12:39 PM
Hide
--3+

Can't wait for Intel's review as well.

coopchennick 06/04/2009 12:43 PM
Hide
-1+

Soo... I guess Toms just decided not to do the SBM giveaway?

Kill@dor 06/04/2009 1:00 PM
Hide
--1+

I have to kind of admit this was a little unfair because DDR3 2000 was not in this line up...why i'm not sure. Intel's processors can utilize DDR3 2000 very well with timings like 9-9-9. But even so, its important to show how DDR3 2000 can perform with AMD and the benefits it has for a stable high clock on your system. If you plan on overclocking 3.0GHz to about 3.6 or 3.8 DDR3 1333-1600 is key in my opintion. Anything higher than 4.0GHz will benefit stability with DDR3 2000. I hope Toms can get a review to show this...

buzznut 06/04/2009 1:31 PM
Hide
--1+

I was disappointed that the memories weren't tested more with overclocking. You did a little bit with the 800 speed, but who is gonna run their ram at that speed?

Well, nice article. It makes me wonder why ddr3 memory is not more effective, does not offer much beyond ddr2. It seems to make a considerable difference in video cards, ddr2 vs ddr3. Will they skip ddr4 and go to ddr5 for mainboard memory, like the upper end ATI cards?

As it has been for a few years, latency is the most important factor with AMD processors.

sublifer 06/04/2009 1:57 PM
Hide
-0+

Only testing in 2T command rate?

anonymous 06/04/2009 2:26 PM
Hide
-2+

Quote "Why does everyone vote down a valid question?"

Because if that person would have read the first page of the article, they would have seen that a Intel article is coming.......

See more

Best offers

All about Memory

Newsletters


OK