Benchmark Results: Alien Vs. Predator (DX11)
Our AVP benchmark starts off with only marginal gains for Quad-SLI, though the addition of anti-aliasing helps the expensive configuration stand out as resolutions are increased.
GeForce GTX 460 owners are limited to three 720p panels if they like AA, but might find the game barely-playable across three 1600x900 displays with AA disabled.
Two GTX 480 cards are suitable for spanning across three 1080p panels, but only with AA disabled. Anyone who wants the best visual experience must step up to three-way SLI, and it appears a fourth card is a waste of money.
127
Comments
Related Stories :
- Gaming Across Three Screens: GTX 460, GTX 480, And Quad-SLI
- Nvidia's GeForce GTX 480: Before And After A Year Of Driver Updates
- Amazing SLI Scaling: Do Two GeForce GTX 460s Beat One GTX 480?
- The GeForce GTX 480 Update: 3-Way SLI, 3D Vision, And Noise
- Nvidia: GeForce GTX 480 Was Designed to Run Hot
- What AMD Thinks of Nvidia's GeForce GTX 480
- Nvidia Shows GeForce GTX 480 ''Hair'' Rendering
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 480 Die Shots Appear Online
- SPIED: Nvidia GeForce GTX 480 Fermi Board Shot
- Nvidia GTX 480 3-Way SLI Tested Against Radeons
sweet jesus, quad sli uses enough watts to power a small town
GTX480 Quad SLI - Yes, it can play Crysis. Maxed out at 5760x1080 too!
Sapphire’s 700 MHz cards
They look like sparkle cards to me.
EDIT: Now fixed, I thought it was funny that sapphire made gtx460s
GTX480 Quad SLI - Yes, it can play Crysis. Maxed out at 5760x1080 too!
It's so hot, it can also make steak BBQ for you! Watch out for anti-terrorist bust over the Fermi thermal suspicion though...
Now i am curious to see a performance difference between tri and quad sli in triple 30" 2500x1600 monitors (7500x1600 resolution).
@duk3
Isnt it nice to know that sappire tech now makes NVIDIA cards because the last time i know they are an ATI exclusive. Good job toms
cool, so the drivers support quad 480s now? i wonder if they support tri SLI 200 series cards, i'm sure theres still people out there who want to try this on their older generation cards
Wow, that power usage is insane! it's hard to believe that these 480's use so much power.. you'd need like a thermaltake toughpower 1500w or something, or maybe 2 PSU's!
4 GTX 480s are a gig. But how much price is it is totally another matter. I prefer to 2-way SLI GTX 480.
cool, so the drivers support quad 480s now? i wonder if they support tri SLI 200 series cards, i'm sure theres still people out there who want to try this on their older generation cards
Has anyone ever seen and article or test that compared gaming success/kills/scores at 1920X1200 versus 1280X720? I do understand that playing at native resolution will give best image quality versus forcing a lower resolution will be blockier image quality wise cause of blended pixels. The reason I ask is because when I'm normally playing a first person shooter im not looking at how nice the grass or pavement is rendered. I'm trying to locate a threat and avoid being shot. Are threats easier to locate high detail and smaller size or low detail and bigger size on the same size monitor?
@vicskyline96
I am currently running 3 GTX 260's in triple sli on three monitors in surround mode on Windows 7 Professional 64 bit. It works great!
I think you guys should do an article comparing multi-display and 3d vision between AMD & Nvidia.
Considering the next gen (The enthusiast cards like Cayman, not the Bart XT cards) will support Eyefinity5 and 3DHD (unsure of the names).
I'm more interested in the multi-monitor gaming aspect, but it would be nice to see an apples to apples comparison of the platforms. To see where Nvidia's implementation stands against the more mature eyefinity platform and Nvidia's more mature 3D platform against AMD's new platform.
Why no 2 way in the lineup!? sheesh - most common of the sli setups... you guys left that out though it woulda been simple to add. Why no Eyfinity in their for comparison purposes either??
My bad - i just found it (must be late for me) Still, wheres the Eyefinity for comparison?
What's wrong with gaming on one bigger screen instead, more than one screen for gaming is overrated IMO, I do think however that Nvidia's 3D vision is a really cool idea and has great potential in the future.
The short answer is cost. Three small displays offer more "real estate" for less cost vs. a single 30" monitor capable of 2560x1600.
What's wrong with gaming on one bigger screen instead, more than one screen for gaming is overrated IMO, I do think however that Nvidia's 3D vision is a really cool idea and has great potential in the future.
I think the great merit of Eyefinity/Surround is the fact that your Field of vision becomes huge. Vistas are rolling by in simulators and in multiplayer FPSs you can see the little bugger hiding in the bush in the corner of your eye.
Why is there no single or double 5870/5850 thrown in there for good measure? I know there was one or two reviews of eyeFinity but it would be good to see in reference for the ton of us that have those cards as opposed to the few that have 480SLI setups.
"Mid-budget"
I think anyone who can afford three monitors is going to be rich enough to buy four GTX480's. There is no "Mid-budget" for three monitors, just "costs too much you rich jerks".