- The GeIL CL 1.5 DDR600 RAM Promise
- Pushing Your DDR2 RAM To The Max
- Separating The Wheat from the Chaff: The Latest DDR2 Modules Tested
- Corsair Reveals Xpert Memory Line: Speed with Sizzle
- Corsair In The Fast Lane: DDR2-667 and DDR400 With Extreme Timing
- THG Puts 13 Bleeding-Edge Memory Modules, 14 Mobos To the Match-Up...
- Samsung PC3700
- Ups and Downs: Memory Timings Put to the Test
- OCZ Attempts to Step Up the Clock Pace with DDR400 Module
- RAM Wars: Return of the JEDEC
- Why are there 5 different kinds of AMD CPUs?????
- AMD pushes out three more triple-core chips!!
- Phenom as good or better than Intel in gaming?
- Build Now or Wait for Nehalem?
- AMD's architecture features
- CPU Overheating HSF Questions
- Hitting a FSB wall too early?
- E7200 3.31GHz, any more headroom?
- Should I air or water cool my gaming rig?-Please help!
- Quad Core q6600 overclocking 3.0 ghz trouble
Synthetic Benchmark Results
Synthetic Benchmark Results
PCMark05

The difference in performance is marginal.
SiSoft Sandra 2005 Pro

Here we have the explanation for the WinRAR results: the GeiL memory is slightly faster, but only because all four DIMM slots leads to a system memory bandwidth impact, as 2x 512 MB is as fast as the 2x 256 GeiL memory.
Note that in a normal scenario using two DIMM slots would allow you to use the faster 1T command rate. This isn't possible when filling all four DIMM slots with the nForce4 motherboard we used, thereby resulting in a 2T command rate, which is between 1-4% slower in most real-life applications. For our tests, however, we used 2T with all memory configurations to single out system memory size as the sole factor that impacted performance.

While the 512 MB GeiL system memory takes a hit during the 256 MB data shuffling in the Combined Index, it also outperforms the Corsair memory when it comes to Speed Factor.
- Previous page Application Benchmark Results
- Next page Multitasking Is What Is Really Affected

