The Memory Articles
- The GeIL CL 1.5 DDR600 RAM Promise
- Pushing Your DDR2 RAM To The Max
- Separating The Wheat from the Chaff: The Latest DDR2 Modules Tested
- Corsair Reveals Xpert Memory Line: Speed with Sizzle
- Corsair In The Fast Lane: DDR2-667 and DDR400 With Extreme Timing
- THG Puts 13 Bleeding-Edge Memory Modules, 14 Mobos To the Match-Up...
- Samsung PC3700
- Ups and Downs: Memory Timings Put to the Test
- OCZ Attempts to Step Up the Clock Pace with DDR400 Module
- RAM Wars: Return of the JEDEC
News
Reviews
Forum
- Why are there 5 different kinds of AMD CPUs?????
- AMD pushes out three more triple-core chips!!
- Phenom as good or better than Intel in gaming?
- Build Now or Wait for Nehalem?
- AMD's architecture features
- CPU Overheating HSF Questions
- Hitting a FSB wall too early?
- E7200 3.31GHz, any more headroom?
- Should I air or water cool my gaming rig?-Please help!
- Quad Core q6600 overclocking 3.0 ghz trouble
Application Benchmark Results
Table of Contents:
Application Benchmark Results
File Decompression: WinRAR 3.41

When decompressing a 2.65 GB ISO file we actually saw some difference - 512 MB was faster. It seems that despite using the same timings and clock frequencies in all our memory tests, the 256 MB sticks from GeiL outperform the 512 MB sticks from Corsair, as indicated by memory-speed sensitive WinRAR. The difference is not so much attributable to the manufacturer, but to the amount of memory rows. Obviously, WinRAR can take advantage of compact memory geometries. More details on this can be found in the synthetic benchmark section. Memory size, however, didn't seem to impact the results at all.
3D Rendering: 3DS Max 7

There were no benefits from extra memory in this scenario.
- Previous page Video Benchmark Results
- Next page Synthetic Benchmark Results

