Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Crowning An Entry-Level SSD Performance King

60/64 GB SSD Shootout: Crucial, Samsung, And SandForce
By

Don't automatically assume that, some day, inexpensive SSDs will overshadow the value of hard drives. Although disk drives are currently more expensive than they were a few months back, it's still difficult to argue against paying seven cents per gigabyte for conventional storage space.

In the face of expanding digital media collections, we need the scalability that expansive disks make accessible. So, let's just call it a given that your next enthusiast-oriented build will include at least one hard drive. And if the disk isn't physically inside that machine, we'll assume it's parked within a gigabit-connected storage appliance surrounded by several other hard drives instead.

Surely, that takes the pressure off of your decision to boot from an SSD. Yeah, a 256 GB solid-state device would be nice. But you can get those same great boot times we demonstrated on the previous page from a 60 or 64 GB SSD for a lot less money. We recommend 120 GB as the best-balanced capacity point. However, even half that much space is enough for Windows and a few performance-sensitive applications.

Although the 60/64 GB SSDs we tested today under-perform higher-capacity models, they're still clearly very fast. So, if you have just enough room in your budget to take a first step into the world of SSDs, we're able to comfortably recommend Samsung’s 64 GB 830 as the model to most consistently impress us throughout testing (and that's why it's getting our Tom Hardware's 2012 Recommended Buy award).

Pricing down at this entry-level segment is very similar from one SATA 6Gb/s SSD to the next. We’ve seen the 64 GB m4, 64 GB 830, and both types of 60 GB SandForce-based drives selling between $120-130. Yet, Samsung’s solution delivers much better performance most often.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 43 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • -1 Hide
    GhosT94 , January 5, 2012 4:13 AM
    what about ocz vertex 3 ?
  • 6 Hide
    acku , January 5, 2012 4:15 AM
    GhosT94what about ocz vertex 3 ?

    Read page 2.

    Cheers,
    Andrew Ku
    TomsHardware.com
  • 2 Hide
    Anonymous , January 5, 2012 5:02 AM
    Wow. Absolutely wonderful article. I did second guess my decision on SSD for my next build for a few. But honestly I'm just using it as a boot drive.
  • 1 Hide
    acku , January 5, 2012 5:19 AM
    kixofmyg0tWow. Absolutely wonderful article. I did second guess my decision on SSD for my next build for a few. But honestly I'm just using it as a boot drive.


    Glad to hear that!

    Cheers,
    Andrew Ku
    TomsHardware.com
  • 0 Hide
    xtreme5 , January 5, 2012 5:46 AM
    gr888888!
  • 0 Hide
    rossi004 , January 5, 2012 5:54 AM
    Ok, so I have the whole SSD for boot, HDD for storage and less intensive programs, but I have a practicality question:

    Is there a way to have files and programs automatically downloaded, installed, and run from the HDD without doing it manually every time if I have the SSD as the base drive?
  • 1 Hide
    james_1978 , January 5, 2012 6:37 AM
    rossi004Ok, so I have the whole SSD for boot, HDD for storage and less intensive programs, but I have a practicality question:Is there a way to have files and programs automatically downloaded, installed, and run from the HDD without doing it manually every time if I have the SSD as the base drive?


    You can move your personal folders to your HDD (my documents, my music, downloads, ...), so downloads will end up there automaticaly, but programs will go to your C drive (SSD) by default.
  • 0 Hide
    james_1978 , January 5, 2012 6:53 AM
    james_1978You can move your personal folders to your HDD (my documents, my music, downloads, ...), so downloads will end up there automaticaly, but programs will go to your C drive (SSD) by default.

    Ok, sorry, but actually you can move your program files by editing the registry:

    Moving only user files is far easier nevertheless, just using "move" in the folder properties...
  • 0 Hide
    james_1978 , January 5, 2012 6:57 AM
    james_1978Ok, sorry, but actually you can move your program files by editing the registry:Moving only user files is far easier nevertheless, just using "move" in the folder properties...

    "Add an url" didn't quite work for me :-)
    http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/6643-63-windows-boot-drive-user-files-program-files-normal
  • 0 Hide
    Soul_keeper , January 5, 2012 6:58 AM
    nice article

    Worth mentioning, plextor PX-M3S are micron based and use toggle nand
    I don't think they make a 64GB version however
  • 0 Hide
    exban224 , January 5, 2012 7:33 AM
    Are the tests on the m4 with the new firmware, if not then is you update the firmware the m4 is overall better. 120gb sandforce speeds anyone in a 64gb package.
  • 0 Hide
    ojas , January 5, 2012 9:48 AM
    Hey great in-depth article Andrew, really liked it!

    BTW: Intel lists different IOPS for its drives. They say, for example, that:
    Random Write (8GB Span)=21000 IOPS
    Random Write (100% Span)=600 IOPS

    Reads seem to be unaffected. What's this about?


    p.s. The graphs in any article (in general) aren't readable using the iOS app :(  have to open it in safari then use the reader...and some comments aren't displayed entirely...i'm using an ipod touch, maybe it works fine on a tablet? :o  Just thought i'd let someone know, didn't who develops the app...
  • 0 Hide
    Dacatak , January 5, 2012 11:43 AM
    What kind of flash does Super Talent use in their 64GB SATA III drives? They are hardly any slower than the higher capacity drives, which shows lower capacity doesn't always have to mean lower speed.
  • 0 Hide
    burnley14 , January 5, 2012 11:50 AM
    Confirms my good decision to buy the 64GB m4! :) 
  • 1 Hide
    john4real4ipok , January 5, 2012 12:58 PM
    my Nokia 2688 is hot and faitning
  • 2 Hide
    a4mula , January 5, 2012 1:12 PM
    http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/08/07/nand_flash_faces_off_synchronous_vs_asynchronous/1

    Something that isn't even mentioned in the article is how full these drives were when benched. A fresh installed SSD with most of its capacity available will perform wonderfully. In real world scenarios where the drive is at 50% capacity however, the asynchronous drives performance falls off the map while the synchronous drives continue to perform well.

    Another issue that really could have been tackled here is RAID0 and performance per dollar of the 60/64GB drives vs their 128/256GB counterparts. I know there is a RAID0 scaling article already out there it would have been nice to see that incorporated here.

    Looking strictly at these benches it would seem as though a 256 m4 is the automatic choice. Maybe straight out of the box, not taking RAID0 into consideration that's the case. Once the drives start filling and considering the near 100% scaling of RAID I think you'd come to a different conclusion.
  • 2 Hide
    peevee , January 5, 2012 3:23 PM
    So, it is pretty clear that at the current flash density 64GB is both too slow (even slower than an old-tech HDD in some cases!) and too inconvenient (fits almost nothing you want to be faster).
    If you cannot afford at least 120GB, just wait and save money, with money saving and prices falling soon you will be able to buy it and enjoy your speed with almost everything except videos and backups/archives (for which HDDs are absolutely adequate).
    Or 240GB better yet.
  • 0 Hide
    BlackHawk91 , January 5, 2012 3:58 PM
    *&^*&, should have bought it back on Black Friday when it was $100 bundled with Batman: Arkham City, but didn't had the money at the time.
  • 1 Hide
    Reynod , January 5, 2012 4:09 PM
    Thanks Andrew.

    I'm getting a Samsung ... this looks to good to miss as a new boot drive, and I'll keep my Momentus XT for storage.

    I'm thinking of 2 of the Seagates in RAID0.

    Does that seem good value for the money ?

    cheers.

    :) 
  • 0 Hide
    jjb8675309 , January 5, 2012 4:10 PM
    I have had a single crucial m4 64 GB running for a little over a year now as a rock solid and fast OS/APP drive
Display more comments