HP OmniBook Ultra 14 review: Potent Snapdragon performance, great endurance, premium pricing

The OmniBook Ultra gains an all-new exterior and a stunningly fast Qualcomm SoC

HP OmniBook Ultra
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

HP hits a homerun on performance with the OmniBook Ultra, but go easy on memory/storage allotments to keep pricing in check.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    A-class productivity performance

  • +

    Premium design

  • +

    Strong battery life

  • +

    Brilliant display

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    $2,900 price is excessive

  • -

    Too much bloatware

  • -

    No Thunderbolt ports

  • -

    Average webcam

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Qualcomm has steadily iterated on its Arm SoC efforts in the Windows space and made further gains with the launch of the Snapdragon X platform.

Now we’re seeing a wave of new systems using Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X2 series of Arm processors, and the HP OmniBook Ultra is the latest to take a bow. Our review unit is powered by a new flagship Snapdragon X2 Elite (X2E-90-100) SoC, paired with a generous 64GB of memory and a capacious 2TB SSD, and features an all-new chassis design.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Brandon Hill
Senior Editor

Brandon Hill is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware. He has written about PC and Mac tech since the late 1990s with bylines at AnandTech, DailyTech, and Hot Hardware. When he is not consuming copious amounts of tech news, he can be found enjoying the NC mountains or the beach with his wife and two sons.

  • VizzieTheViz
    I get that it’s a nice and pretty fast ultrabook but I just don’t get why I should get an ARM instead of a x86 laptop.

    It’s not really so much faster that you’d really notice it, the battery life isn’t that much better and the pricing certainly isn’t any better.

    For running windows I’d rather have an x86 laptop that will run everything without any hassle and will let me install Linux sometime down the road than this ARM thing that’ll probably give me grief at some point over running some app that I want to use and will probably have worse Linux driver support when I want to install that because MS decided a perfectly good laptop isn’t allow to use the next version of windows for some obscure reason.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    I wish this wasn’t an arm vs x86 argument so much. It’s already awesome that we have some non Intel/Amd competitors evolving. I hope they can hold on to get fair market share.
    Reply
  • VizzieTheViz
    Gururu said:
    I wish this wasn’t an arm vs x86 argument so much. It’s already awesome that we have some non Intel/Amd competitors evolving. I hope they can hold on to get fair market share.
    That’s fair. Competition is almost always a good thing and ARM, as Apple has shown, did and does have some advantages.

    It’s just that for me this review shows that x86 has pretty much closed the gap with ARM where ARM had a clear advantage earlier (battery life was especially good compared to x86 when we first got ARM laptops and ARM was more affordable too).

    I’m not against an ARM laptop per se, but I’d like to see them clearly outperform x86 on some metric to make them interesting for me when considering laptops.

    If I saw this laptop for almost $3K I’d not even consider it as I could get an x86 laptop with windows that performs similarly or a MacBook Pro for that kind of money.

    Still I’m not everybody and if you’re sure you’ll never run across an app that won’t play nice with ARM and you like the looks of this laptop I could get someone buying it. Just not me.
    Reply