Acer Predator X27U OLED gaming monitor review: Leveled-up image quality and gaming performance

27-inch QHD OLED gaming monitor with 240 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, HDR400 and wide gamut color

Reviews
By
published
Acer Predator X27U
Editor's Choice
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Though LCD is the dominant technology of today’s computer displays, OLED has come a long way from its exotic origins. It comes at the premium price you’d expect for something that delivers the highest levels of image quality and gaming performance. But there is nothing that delivers more contrast, more color and better motion resolution. And when the stars align, it has the lowest input lag.

(Image credit: Acer)

The stars have definitely aligned around Acer’s Predator X27U. It has the lowest input lag I’ve measured, equal to a 540 Hz FHD LCD screen. It has the quickest panel response of any 240 Hz monitor I’ve reviewed. It has perfect motion resolution, as all OLEDs do, with no need for overdrive or strobing. Once you’ve gamed on it, nothing else will do.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Image quality is next level as well. Contrast is unmeasurable thanks to the deepest blacks possible on a video display. There are brighter LCDs but the X27U hits an honest 600 nits peak with small highlights cracking the 1,000-nit mark. It covers almost 100% of the DCI-P3 color gamut, well above the industry average. With a few adjustments, it matched any pro screen I’ve reviewed for color accuracy. The HDR picture is stunning as well. My only nitpick is that switching modes is fiddlier than it needs to be.

Aside from that, the Acer Predator X27U is without flaw. I strongly advise that you do not try one out unless you intend to buy it. Because once you play games on it, you won’t be able to help yourself. It’s that good. If you have the budget and the supporting hardware, definitely check it out.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

MORE: How to Choose the Best HDR Monitor

Christian Eberle
Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.

8 Comments Comment from the forums
  • gg83
    Thank you so much for this review and calibration recommendation! I bought this monitor a few months ago. I have been using amd adrenaline to adjust color hue and whatnot. I have it set per game so maybe I won't have to do that anymore.
    Reply
  • Perosteck
    I can't see that this has G-Sync anywhere on the product specs online, or on the Asus website. Is this correct?
    Reply
  • Order 66
    um, anyone notice how it says DisplayHDR 400 certification when the measured HDR brightness is 600 nits? does that seem strange to anyone else? I'm also confused on why this monitor has two different HDR certifications. If it has HDR 10 and can reach 1000 nits, then why only DisplayHDR400?
    Reply
  • parkerthon
    So… I scrolled this article which is brimming with praise, but nothing about burn in for people that run windows for productivity all day? I understand it’s a flaw of all oled but it’s still worth calling out. Asus has no burn-in protection apparently. Also it’s woled so text clarity presumably sucks. Will continue to wait patiently for a technological miracle that solves these two issues I guess. Also hdr support for games is still awful. At ~$700 for a 27” monitor you’d ideally use ONLY for gaming on a few select titles that really embrace hdr… bit much. Really hoping mini-led eventually comes along. I don’t need pure blacks, just something that’s not a gray white glow.
    Reply
  • UnforcedERROR
    parkerthon said:
    Really hoping mini-led eventually comes along. I don’t need pure blacks, just something that’s not a gray white glow.
    Mini-LED already exists in monitors (this article even notes the alternative version was prior to this OLED), and they're appreciably cheaper in most cases. The AOC Q27G3XMN and KTC M27T20/Cooler Master GP27Q are all decent. The AOC isn't even $300, and the KTC can be about $330 if you find a coupon. HDR is good for movies too, but I'd never recommend a monitor for that over a good TV.
    Order 66 said:
    um, anyone notice how it says DisplayHDR 400 certification when the measured HDR brightness is 600 nits? does that seem strange to anyone else? I'm also confused on why this monitor has two different HDR certifications. If it has HDR 10 and can reach 1000 nits, then why only DisplayHDR400?
    You're misunderstanding the certifications. HDR10 is a static metadata certification mainly used in film and TV. It can be mastered up to 4,000 nits, but largely aims for 1,000. A TV/monitor doesn't have to hit 1,000 nits to get HDR10 certified, and most content isn't mastered that bright anyway. Presumably HDR600 should be applicable here, but I suppose they decided to play it safe. HDR400/600/1000 is a VESA standard for monitors, unlike HDR10 which is more about decoding the HDR10 signal.

    Also OLEDs are notably less bright than mini-LED. Some newer models can hit a peak brightness of over 1,000 nits in highlight tests, but full screen brightness is often far less. As an example, the Sony A95L has a peak highlight of 1,350 nits. A TCL QM8? 2,500, and in some cases read up to 3,000+. Peak brightness on that A95L is like 300 nits though, so it's all relative.
    Reply
  • Order 66
    UnforcedERROR said:
    The AOC Q27G3XMN
    I have this monitor and it’s great. It gets extremely bright. If I wasn’t so concerned about OLED burn in, I would’ve gotten the x27u
    Reply
  • UnforcedERROR
    Order 66 said:
    I have this monitor and it’s great. It gets extremely bright. If I wasn’t so concerned about OLED burn in, I would’ve gotten the x27u
    Yup! I went the same route for the same reasons. Micro-LED is probably going to be the best option once it scales down, but that's a few years out still.
    Reply
  • icycool
    Christian, I am not reading your reviews anymore.
    You fail to be up front about the panel used. QD-OLED is vastly different from WOLED.
    You never mention text clarity. Something people actually care about.
    See TFTCentral on how to do a proper monitor review.
    Reply