Skip to main content

Intel Quietly Launches the Celeron 1019Y ULV Processor

Intel has quietly taken the wraps off its newest ULV microprocessor, the Ivy Bridge-based Celeron 1019Y. Like all mobile Celerons, the 1019Y is a dual-core processor clocked at 1 GHz, a 2 MB L3 cache and features an integrated 350 MHz GPU with a maximum turbo frequency of 800 MHz.

Though the CPU supports Virtualization and other basic technologies, it lacks more advanced features such as Hyper-Threading and Turbo Boost. The chip has a 10 W TDP and can even operate within a 7 W envelop with reduced performance.

The Celeron 1019Y is currently on sale for $153.

Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback

  • spentshells
    BIT MINING
    Reply
  • bigpinkdragon286
    How does this compare to the original C-50 from AMD which has been available for years and came in at 9 W?
    Reply
  • dalethepcman
    Uhh... $153 for a 1ghz dual core celeron seems ridiculous when an ivy bridge pentium 2020 costs $65 and if you downclocked it to 1ghz would probably be in the 15w range and give double the performance.
    Reply
  • spentshells
    10642982 said:
    How does this compare to the original C-50 from AMD which has been available for years and came in at 9 W?

    Well it has an intergrated gpu so IM not sure they compare so well.

    Picture ivy bridge dual core vs athlon2 x2

    Not a pretty picture.
    Reply
  • artk2219
    10643080 said:
    10642982 said:
    How does this compare to the original C-50 from AMD which has been available for years and came in at 9 W?

    Well it has an intergrated gpu so IM not sure they compare so well.

    Picture ivy bridge dual core vs athlon2 x2

    Not a pretty picture.


    Not even an athlon II dual core, its really like an ivy bridge dual core vs an original Turion x2, the C50 gets absolutely destroyed.

    Reply
  • spentshells
    10643327 said:
    10643080 said:
    10642982 said:
    How does this compare to the original C-50 from AMD which has been available for years and came in at 9 W?

    Well it has an intergrated gpu so IM not sure they compare so well.

    Picture ivy bridge dual core vs athlon2 x2


    Not a pretty picture.


    Not even an athlon II dual core, its really like an ivy bridge dual core vs an original Turion x2, the C50 gets absolutely destroyed.

    I was being generous, i've seen POS systems using that cpu, once out of the os the thing had issues playing back higher res video not even at 1080P.
    Reply
  • griptwister
    But can it run Crysis?
    Reply
  • blibba
    10643074 said:
    Uhh... $153 for a 1ghz dual core celeron seems ridiculous when an ivy bridge pentium 2020 costs $65 and if you downclocked it to 1ghz would probably be in the 15w range and give double the performance.

    1) You can't under or over clock either chip
    2) Performance would be identical
    3) They're not for the same socket
    Reply
  • artk2219
    10643349 said:
    10643327 said:
    10643080 said:
    10642982 said:
    How does this compare to the original C-50 from AMD which has been available for years and came in at 9 W?

    Well it has an intergrated gpu so IM not sure they compare so well.

    Picture ivy bridge dual core vs athlon2 x2


    Not a pretty picture.


    Not even an athlon II dual core, its really like an ivy bridge dual core vs an original Turion x2, the C50 gets absolutely destroyed.

    I was being generous, i've seen POS systems using that cpu, once out of the os the thing had issues playing back higher res video not even at 1080P.


    I haven't seen problems that severe unless they loaded the poor thing down with so much bloatware that it was super impeding performance. But you're right, they aren't going to win any speed races. What really gets me about the celeron is that price, 153 bucks for pretty much an underclocked and undervolted standard Celeron. I'd be very curious to see how many of these chips they actually sell, those margins have to be awesome on their end.
    Reply
  • dalethepcman
    10643412 said:
    1) You can't under or over clock either chip
    2) Performance would be identical
    3) They're not for the same socket

    1.) /facepalm. Are you really that naive? (look up "Speed Step")
    2.) 2020 has 1MB more cache and 30% faster gpu clocks, See #1
    3.) Who knew a BGA cpu wouldn't fit into an LGA socket, See #1
    Reply