EU Parliament Asks Zuckerberg If He Created A ‘Digital Monster’

Today, the EU Parliament grilled Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on the company's track record with data privacy, and asked him whether or not he believes the “digital monster” he created should be regulated. Facebook had initially tried to make the hearing private, but some MEPs (Members of the European Parliament) threatened not to attend unless it was public.

MEPs No Longer Trust Facebook

Some of the MEPs made it known that they’ve been paying attention to what Facebook and Zuckerberg have been doing and saying over the past few years and making a note of Zuckerberg’s repetitive apologies over the past decade.

The MEPs seemed to expect Zuckerberg to answer most of the questions in the same way he did in the U.S. Congressional hearings, which is exactly what he did for the most part. However, the MEPs also warned Zuckerberg that they no longer trust Facebook to “self-regulate.”

The MEPs also wondered whether or not Zuckerberg or anyone inside Facebook could even fix the company’s many issues, which range from data leaks to fake news, election manipulation, hate speech, and so on.

Facebook Violated EU Laws

Guy Verhofstadt noted that Facebook has already violated the existing Data Protection Directive by transferring what, until recently, was “European data” to its headquarters in the United States.

Facebook recently stopped processing the data of 1.5 billion international users (except EU citizens) through the Facebook Ireland headquarters. The company now processes every non-EU citizen's data in the United States. However, the data of all of those foreigners were “European data,” according to Verhofstadt, and Facebook shouldn’t have been allowed to transfer it. Verhofstadt was one of the MEPs that threatened not to attend if the hearing was restricted from public view.

Max Schrems, the Austrian who sued Facebook and brought the invalidation of the Safe Harbor agreement, also noted recently on Twitter that Facebook blocked his account because he didn’t “consent” to the company’s new privacy policy, a practice that should be illegal under the GDPR.

We also know that Facebook is still being investigated in multiple countries over previous EU privacy law violations.

Zuckerberg’s ‘Digital Monster’

Verhofstadt asked Zuckerberg if he wants to be remembered like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, who have enriched our world, or as a “genius that created a digital monster that is destroying our democracies and our societies.”

Nikolas Bay, another MEP, brought attention to the issue of Facebook closing down users’ accounts when it doesn’t agree with the company’s views, noting how absurd it would be for a telephone company to do the same to its own customers

Bay added that Facebook is privatizing our public liberties beyond any jurisdictional or parliamentary control. He added that Facebook has the kind of sovereignty that competes with nation states.

Time To Break Up Facebook’s Monopoly?

One of the MEPs, Manfred Weber, recalled that earlier this year Zuckerberg dodged a U.S. Senator's question on how many direct competitors Facebook has. Weber then wondered if it’s time to break Facebook’s monopoly because it has too much power. This idea was recently echoed by multiple American consumer advocacy groups, calling for WhatsApp, Messenger, and Instagram to be separated into different companies.

Verhofstadt also suggested that Facebook should open its books so that the antitrust regulators can verify whether or not the company is a monopoly.

Zuckerberg didn’t make significant new revelations with his answers, and the hearing ended before he could answer all the questions. However, he promised to respond to the MEPs’ additional questions in writing over the next few days.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg Discusses Data Privacy With European Parliament President

Create a new thread in the News comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
9 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • bloodroses
    The biggest issue that I've ran into with Facebook is when I go to cancel/delete my account, half my android games no longer work. Luckily, the other half use my Google account. There should be no reason why Android games are not 100% google account compatible; especially since Android is Google's OS and all the games came from the Google Play Store.
    I've never used an Apple phone, so I don't know if the same issue persists on the other side with games for IOS.
  • 10tacle
    Facebook has gotten way too intrusive. When I read they tried to access user's health care records and bias their trending stories with a political slant, that for me was the last straw. I am by no means a fan of the EU fat cat bureaucrats sitting in their comfy offices in Brussels telling Brits what kind of electric tea pots they are allowed to own based on power consumption (one of countless fascist examples of EU dictatorship over individual countries).

    However, good on the EU for doing what our members of Congress are too cowardly to do in the US. That Senate hearing and questioning that Zuckerberg faced was a farce and accomplished nothing. Facebook has no competition and they know it. It has become too deeply embedded in our society these days. People communicate via FB daily instead of "old fashioned" email because it is a one stop shop convenient portal with friends and family. Then there are businesses that use it for marketing and competing with each other for "what's trending now" graphs.

    Now even if Congress does approve to break it up, how would they do it? It's not like you can break up Facebook like they did with AT&T Bell into different regions for local control creating Baby Bells (Regional Bell Operating Companies or RBOCs).
  • 10tacle
    Anonymous said:
    The biggest issue that I've ran into with Facebook is when I go to cancel/delete my account, half my android games no longer work.


    That to me sounds like an anti-trust violation worthy of a class action lawsuit against FB and Congressional action. If they were free to play like with ads tied to FB, that's one thing. But if you *paid* for them, that is definitely anti-trust and breach of contract.

    I hear from friends, especially Apple owners, that the FB app is a resource and battery train hog. Not surprising considering how it is so interconnected with other apps. I use Google + on my Note 7 and it runs flawlessly. Unfortunately, not many of my friends or relatives use it. That's just the price I (and they) will pay for me rejecting Farcebook. They can call, text, or email me if they want to communicate with me. Sadly, this means I have lost touch with some of them over the years. Oh well.