Intel Reportedly Cancels Thunder Bay Hybrid SoC

Stock image of a generic chip
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Intel has quietly canceled its hybrid Thunder Bay system-on-chip (SoC) that integrates general-purpose CPU cores and computer vision-oriented Movidius hardware. The chipmaker does not disclose the reasons behind its decisions, but it looks like Intel's CPUs and vision processing units (VPUs) will remain separated for now. 

"Remove Thunder Bay specific code as the product got canceled and there are no end customers or users," a Linux patch discovered by Phoronix reads.

Intel kept details about its Thunder Bay SoC under wraps. Based on Linux patches uncovered by Phoronix, the Thunder Bay SoC was meant to be a low-power design packing Arm Cortex-A53 CPU cores and Movidius VPU hardware (which Intel acquired by taking over Movidius in 2016). Still, the exact configuration of the product remained unknown. 

Intel's Thunder Bay SoC was intended for commercial and Internet-of-Things applications requiring computer vision acceleration and general-purpose processing capabilities. Such edge-computing applications are expected to get increasingly common in smart cities. 

Meanwhile, it looks like users of applications that need CPUs and VPUs are perhaps satisfied with their edge servers running Xeon and Movidius silicon, such as the Keem Bay accelerator card introduced in 2019.

Furthermore, as machine learning acceleration gets ubiquitous, many applications may adopt different hardware, including Intel's own Habana Gaudi, Nvidia's GPUs or Jetson SoCs (with integrated GPU cores). As a result, it remains to be seen whether Intel decides to offer a Thunder Bay-like SoC in the future and how this potential product will be configured.

While Movidius VPUs are not mentioned regularly, they have their benefits. The Movidius vision processing unit packs general-purpose MIPS cores with programmable 128-bit vector processing (called SHAVE cores), various hardware accelerators, and image signal processing capabilities. Therefore, VPUs are somewhat more tailored for edge-computing applications from power consumption and footprint points of view than high-performance AI/ML accelerators.

Anton Shilov
Freelance News Writer

Anton Shilov is a Freelance News Writer at Tom’s Hardware US. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • dalek1234
    Here we go again. Intel cancelled something.
    Can we get a list of Intel's cancellations in the last, say, 2 years? It would help as I am losing track.
    Reply
  • Gunkk0
    Consumer products companies have to keep trying new products, whether the strategy is by contract or by "build it and they will come." If one or two out of ten are successful, then it's a huge win.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Gunkk0 said:
    Consumer products companies have to keep trying new products, whether the strategy is by contract or by "build it and they will come." If one or two out of ten are successful, then it's a huge win.
    This wasn't a consumer product (and I'd argue that Intel isn't really a consumer products company), but I think your point illustrates their mindset pretty well.

    Intel bought at least 3 different AI chip companies: Movidius, Nervana, and Habana Labs. Nervana got killed off when they bought Habana. Movidius was focused on mobile and IoT, so to put them in a server board seems like a poor fit. Plus, that's Habana's whole thing. Intel isn't really big in the IoT or phone sectors. So, unless GNA is using Movidius IP, I don't really see a place for them.
    Reply