DRAM prices predicted to jump 63% in Q2, NAND up to 75% — follows 95% jumps in Q1, Trendforce says AI server demand keeps supply tight
NAND Flash contract prices are now rising faster than DRAM.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Conventional DRAM contract prices will rise 58% to 63% quarter-over-quarter in Q2 2026, while NAND Flash contract prices will jump 70% to 75% QoQ, according to TrendForce's latest memory pricing survey. The increases follow a Q1 that saw DRAM contracts climb by a record 90% to 95% QoQ, meaning the rate of DRAM price growth has slowed somewhat, even as NAND Flash prices have accelerated sharply from the prior quarter's circa 60% increase.
Unfortunately, the underlying issue of DRAM suppliers reallocating capacity towards AI-related applications still exists, and NAND production is increasingly being directed toward enterprise SSDs. Cloud service providers are also securing the bulk of available supply through long-term agreements, and meaningful capacity expansion is not expected until late 2027 at the earliest.
The server segment is driving demand in this market, with North American cloud providers ramping AI inference infrastructure and buying up high-capacity RDIMMs in volume, TrendForce said. Meanwhile, memory makers — drawn by better margins on server products — are locking in multi-quarter supply deals with their largest customers to underwrite future capacity builds.
Article continues belowPC DRAM demand has been revised downward, yet suppliers have simultaneously reduced shipments to PC OEMs and module makers, meaning OEMs receiving lower allocation fulfillment are being forced to procure at higher prices from suppliers or module vendors, which is keeping prices elevated despite softer system-level demand.
NAND Flash's c. 75% QoQ increase outpaces DRAM for the first time in the current cycle, while demand for enterprise SSDs hasn't let up as large-scale generative AI deployments continue to absorb the lion's share of production capacity. TrendForce said it expects a pronounced shortage through 2026, with new fab capacity unlikely to come online in volume before late 2027 or 2028; cloud providers are willing to pay more and commit to multi-quarter purchase agreements to guarantee allocation.
Client SSD buyers are restocking preemptively out of concern that server demand could absorb all available capacity, with suppliers maintaining prices by continuing to limit supply to client SSDs. The eMMC/UFS segment faces the tightest supply gap of any NAND product category because process capacity for eMMC/UFS overlaps with enterprise SSD production and offers significantly lower margins, making it the lowest-priority allocation for suppliers.
Meanwhile, NAND flash bit output growth remains limited despite process upgrades and higher QLC adoption. PC and smartphone vendors are reducing product storage capacities to manage costs, while NAND flash wafers have become the lowest-priority shipment category for suppliers due to thin margins and inventory adjustments.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist. Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.
-
tennis2 Apparently TrendForce hasn't heard the news about Google's TurboQuant.Reply
(Joking of course. Their predictions were likely made before the TurboQuant announcement) -
gghgh Reply
It won't matter, economics don't work like that, read about jevons paradoxtennis2 said:Apparently TrendForce hasn't heard the news about Google's TurboQuant.
(Joking of course. Their predictions were likely made before the TurboQuant announcement) -
Shiznizzle Reply
Ah, yes. Economics. Where even economists themselves dont know what is going on half the time.gghgh said:It won't matter, economics don't work like that, read about jevons paradox
You pull one level and three others are affected. Economics is not like math where you can predict the end result. Half the time they themselves admit a fair amount of guess work is involved in their calculations.
One more issue not talked about is the artificially constrained supply of the above mentioned goods slated for price increases. If they produce less just to keep the prices as they are or force price increases then governments need to step in. How and why governments have not stepped in yet is beyond me.
Maybe they are waiting for the day china turns off the rare earth tap before they really act -
jb27 Will Turboquant actually reduce AI RAM demand?Reply
Or will demand be sustained at current rates so that the quality of AI answers improves?
And what of these letters of intent Sam Altman signed to buy up 40% of global RAM supply from SK hynix and Samsung that were not followed up by actual orders.
Just another market manipulation to get rich quick? -
usertests Reply
It only affects one portion of the RAM used, and if it could turn unprofitable inference into profitable, that probably won't be a big help.jb27 said:Will Turboquant actually reduce AI RAM demand?
But now the focus is on supply issues. -
pjmelect Does this news take into account that the demand for memory was created by the intent to buy large amounts of memory by Sam Altman of open AI which has fallen through?Reply -
InfiniteWeatherMan Boy, they are REALLY trying hard to get gamers into subscription based items and PCs! I for my part will resist in every shape and form from this BS if that is to occur, because this shit reeks of sub crap..Reply