Ineo M9 SSD Heatsink and Cooler Review: Strong performance, interesting design

Rotatable design with both an active heatpipe and a quietly running 30mm PWM fan

Ineo M9 SSD Heatsink
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Ineo’s M9 sports an interesting design and very good cooling performance in our testing. But I’m concerned that bending may be an issue over time.

Pros

  • +

    Strongest thermal performance

  • +

    Reasonable $16.99 USD price

Cons

  • -

    Design may lead to bending

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The latest SSD cooler to land on our test bench is the M9 NVMe SSD heatsink from Ineo, a company that specializes in niche products, like NVMe-to-USB adapters, SSD heatsinks, and other related devices. This heatsink features a split design with two heatsinks connected by a 6mm copper heatpipe, one suspended above the other, and actively cooled by a 30mm PWM fan.

Does Ineo’s M9 perform well enough to compete with the best SSD heatsinks we’ve tested for your storage? Are there any other issues you should be aware of? Before we get to the benchmarks, we’ll take a quick look at the features and specifications of this product.

Cooler Specifications

Swipe to scroll horizontally
HeatsinkIneo M9 NVMe SSD Heatsink
MSRP$16.99
Heatsink MaterialAluminum alloy
CompatibilityM.2 2280
Dimensions83mm (L) x 31mm (W) x 52mm (H)
Weight110g
Warranty1 year

Packing and included contents

Ineo’s M9 arrives in a very small box, suited to the size of the heatsink.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Opening the box reveals the heatsink, thermal pads, and included screwdriver.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Installation

The installation of this NVMe heatsink is fairly simple and easy to complete. 

1. To begin, you’ll first need to disassemble the unit. Then, you’ll apply the first thermal pad to the base of the heatsink.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

2. Place your M.2 NVMe SSD onto the thermal pad. Take the second thermal pad, and place it on top.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

3. Next, place the heatsink on top of the SSD and secure it using the included screws.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

4. The last step is to place the unit into an m.2 slot and secure it using a screw or alternative method and connect the PWM connection to a motherboard header.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Features of the Ineo M9

*️⃣ Split heatsinks connected by a 6mm copper heatpipe 

The Ineo M9 features split heatsink design with the two parts connected by a copper heatpipe.

*️⃣ Double sided SSD support

Some NVMe heatsinks only effectively cool the top side of a SSD – which means they’re not effective for storage drives with NAND on both sides of the PCB. Ineo’s M9 supports double-sided SSDs and will keep both sides of the unit cooled effectively, ensuring peak performance at all times.

*️⃣ 30mm fan for active cooling

In addition to the dual heatsinks and 6mm copper heatpipe, Ineo includes a small 30mm fan to actively dissipate heat away from your SSD.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

*️⃣ Rotatable design

In order to minimize compatibility concerns, the top half of the heatsink can be rotated to the left or right if desired.

(Image credit: Ineo M9)

What I don’t like about Ineo’s M9

❌ Bending concerns

The top heatsink is connected by a single copper heatsink only on one side, and there is nothing underneath the top heatsink to support it otherwise. This can lead to bending over time, and in fact the unit I received was slightly bent upon arrival. Whether or not this is a problem is another matter, in theory any bending that would continue to occur would be minor and shouldn’t cause a problem. Nonetheless, I would prefer a design with better support.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Compatibility concerns

While the unit can be rotated to avoid interfering with one device, that can result in compatibility issues on the other side. So you may need to install this device in a non-primary m.2 slot, depending on the CPU cooler and GPU you’re using.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

How hot is too hot? Does cooling even matter for a SSD?

Until recently, cooling and storage was at best an afterthought for most enthusiasts and PC builders – it really wasn’t a concern outside of servers jammed with hard drives. With SSD heatsinks, a lot of you are probably asking if it really matters. And the truth is that if you’re a typical user who merely loads a few applications and games from time to time – you don’t need an advanced heatsink. I’ve run a variety of tests, and for common tasks like loading a game or application, you generally don’t need more than a basic heatsink – at least not with current SSDs and workloads. 

That said, current-gen PCIe 5 SSDs can transfer more data in less time than ever before, and pushing those speeds can generate extra heat depending on the type of workload. With these modern drives, not only is some kind of cooling recommended, it’s a requirement to prevent throttling or even crashing in some instances.

There is now a large market for NVMe SSDs heatsinks and coolers to ensure PCIe 5 drives can maintain maximum speeds. Heatsinks large and small, with or without active fans, and even liquid cooling solutions are now available for purchase. 

Most users who will need cooling for their drives will already be aware that they need one. This includes users whose workloads are IO-intensive or involve high-resolution video editing. We’re also trying to look to the future here, to an extent. While today’s common workloads might not need anything more than a basic heatsink, this may change with PCIe 6 and future standards which will allow for higher speeds (and potentially higher power consumption) in consumer SSDs. 

After consulting storage experts across the industry who work for Sabrent, Solidigm, Phison, Micron, and other storage manufacturers I’ve created an IOMeter script that’s specifically designed to stress an SSD’s controller and NAND, causing it to reach its maximum temperature (also known as TJ Max). The ambient temperature is maintained at 23 degrees Celsius while these tests are performed. The SSD used is Teamgroup’s Z540 SSD, powered by Phison’s E26 controller

This test will cause throttling when paired with lower-end heatsinks. For those heatsinks, we’ll be looking at the IOPS of the drive during testing. The more advanced heatsinks and coolers will be capable of keeping the SSD under its peak temperature – for these units, we’ll compare the actual temperatures of the TeamGroup Z540 SSD. 

When I was determining how to test these units, I consulted with many storage industry experts before I started testing. They emphasized that modern PCIe 5.0 drives need at least some sort of cooling to avoid throttling and that even basic workloads can be impacted by minor throttling without a heatsink. 

If peak performance in common scenarios like gaming is your only goal, then most basic heatsinks will offer satisfactory performance. However, users with storage intensive workloads will require a stronger heatsink, like the Ineo M9 SSD heatsink we’re reviewing today, in order to prevent their SSDs performance from throttling. The impact of this potential throttling can vary; lighter loads won’t be impacted as much, but in the worst-case scenario I tested I measured a 92% loss of performance without cooling on a PCIe 5.0 SSD. 

You might think that’s the only aspect to consider when looking at a heatsink, but the thermals of a SSD also have a huge impact on a drive’s longevity. Much like other electronic components, extreme variations in temperature cause wear and tear, reducing lifespan. Now let’s be real here - most users shouldn’t need to worry about longevity, and instead should purchase a drive from a reliable manufacturer that has a good warranty. While this is our general recommendation, there are scenarios where this won’t apply - if you purchased a refurbished SSD at a discount, you can’t expect to have a long warranty.

Finally, there’s the matter of dealing with the hassle of a warranty. While it is nice to know that a failing drive will be replaced by the manufacturer, why create an environment where such a claim is likely to happen? I’d argue that it would be wiser to invest $10 or $15 into a heatsink to extend the lifespan of your SSD so that you don’t have to worry about dealing with the paperwork and time involved to process a warranty claim.

In theory, if your NVMe SSD arrives with a heatsink from the manufacturer, you shouldn’t need to worry about a heatsink at all. Most of the heatsinks I’ve seen paired with high-end PCIe 5 SSDs are more than capable enough of handling strong thermal loads. However, many drives do not include a heatsink with the purchase of an SSD, and you shouldn’t run a high-speed PCIe 5 SSD entirely uncooled as performance will suffer even in common workloads. 

Also, every expert I’ve spoken to in the storage industry agrees that it is best practice to minimize temperature variations for the health and longevity of your SSD. How strong of a heatsink you’ll need is another matter for debate. In common scenarios, most users will be fine with basic heatsinks - but professionals or users with storage-intensive workloads might want to invest in a stronger heatsink.

Testing Methodology

Swipe to scroll horizontally
CPUIntel Core i7-13700K
MotherboardMSI Z690 A Pro DDR4
SSDTeamGroup Z540
CaseBe Quiet! Silent Base 802, system fans set to speed 1 setting.
PSUCooler Master XG Plus 850 Platinum PSU
Testing MethodCustom IOMeter Script, 30 minute test length

To test the heatsinks, I’ve created a custom IOMeter script with input from experts in the industry. I run an initial test of 30 minutes after installing the heatsink to burn it in. After turning the system off and allowing it to cool down, I run another 30-minute test. I’ll repeat the process for verification and if there is no variance I consider the results accurate. If there is variance, I’ll test the heatsink twice more. 

Tests are performed inside of  Be Quiet’s Silent Base 802. I use a 360mm AIO to avoid having the CPU Cooler potentially impact the results, but there’s an argument to be made that the most petite heatsinks should be tested under an air cooler. We’ll investigate this further in upcoming reviews to see how much – or little – this can impact the results of lower-end heatsinks. 

All testing is performed with an ambient temperature of 23 degrees Celsius.

Noise Levels

I always test NVMe heatsinks with fans with my motherboard’s default setting, shown below. I never bothered to adjust this because at this setting, none of the units I’ve tested ran louder than my system fans at idle – and I like a nice, quietly running system.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

At least for every unit I’ve tested, it would be pointless to run any of these heatsinks fans at full speed. You won’t gain any additional storage performance or speed, and the thermal benchmarks recorded while running at the settings shown below were excellent.

Albert Thomas
Freelancer, CPU Cooling Reviewer

Albert Thomas is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering CPU cooling reviews.

  • PlutoDelic
    Honestly, if Gen5 will take off, it's either with good cooling or figuring out efficiency, and i'm betting more on the former.

    With that said, have you gotten your hands on that AIO SSD cooler yet? I have no clue why they're not selling it. It's niche, but it begs for a second life to the exhaust fan.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    PlutoDelic said:
    With that said, have you gotten your hands on that AIO SSD cooler yet? I have no clue why they're not selling it. It's niche, but it begs for a second life to the exhaust fan.
    It's been "coming soon" for about a year now. I'm starting to wonder if it's going to become vaporware.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Are there any chances of getting Thermalright HR-09/Pro, HR-10/Pro for review?

    They looked promising, unlike the sagging heatpipe and doesn't fit dimensions of the M9.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    Notton said:
    Are there any chances of getting Thermalright HR-09/Pro, HR-10/Pro for review?

    They looked promising, unlike the sagging heatpipe and doesn't fit dimensions of the M9.
    The HR-09/HR-09 Pro and HR10 Pro's results are included in this review
    Reply
  • bit_user
    I wouldn't worry about the heatpipe bending slightly, during shipping. That amount of bending + correcting it shouldn't be an issue.

    I can't imagine it would bend, once installed. If you hit it hard enough to bend it after mounting, it's probably better the heatpipe absorb that force rather than transmit it down to the motherboard. The swiveling should also help, there.

    What slightly bothers me about this is the"swivel" feature. As neat as it is, that seems like it'd hurt the ability of the heat pipe to absorb heat from the SSD. Then again, it does seem like a little bit overkill for the dozen or so Watts a M.2 drive is allowed to burn.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Albert.Thomas said:
    The HR-09/HR-09 Pro and HR10 Pro's results are included in this review
    okay thanks! IDK how I missed those
    Reply
  • thestryker
    I'm still hoping to see the Thermalright M.2 2280 PRO on here as it seems like it might be a low profile/low cost winner. After having one installed for over a month it's still slightly better than the Thermalright AB I had installed before, but less than it originally was. I think this is due to it being installed on an Optane drive which is running the OS so I'd be really curious how it handles normal loads.

    All of the current coolers on the list that can handle the PCIe 5.0 drives are taller and/or have active cooling so I doubt it would go that far, but should handle the PCIe 4.0.
    Reply
  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    I'd really like to know if the built-in heatsink provided by the m/b was tested. A lot of them give you a heatsink that might even tie in to active cooling connected to the chipset/VRM cooling. So it would be nice to know if the basic heatsink that might already come w/your board gets you close to the temps shown here.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    2Be_or_Not2Be said:
    I'd really like to know if the built-in heatsink provided by the m/b was tested. A lot of them give you a heatsink that might even tie in to active cooling connected to the chipset/VRM cooling. So it would be nice to know if the basic heatsink that might already come w/your board gets you close to the temps shown here.
    The problem with testing like that is they vary massively from board to board. Some are undoubtedly good enough to cool PCIe 5.0 drives under maximum load while others might not manage PCIe 4.0.

    Generally speaking though unless you have some very heavy storage workloads pretty any heatsink ought to be good enough (some motherboard/aftermarket don't properly cool double sided should you happen to have one so this is something to keep an eye on).
    Reply
  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    thestryker said:
    The problem with testing like that is they vary massively from board to board. Some are undoubtedly good enough to cool PCIe 5.0 drives under maximum load while others might not manage PCIe 4.0.

    Generally speaking though unless you have some very heavy storage workloads pretty any heatsink ought to be good enough (some motherboard/aftermarket don't properly cool double sided should you happen to have one so this is something to keep an eye on).
    Could be a good test of a number of the new 870 boards coming on the market. Take a collection of models from Asus, MSI, Gigabyte, and ASRock - see where the "average" temps range for their default setup. Maybe that would also help standardize the minimum level of heatsink those boards should provide.

    I know PCIe 5.0 SSDs can generate more heat, but it seemed like you'd need to go up to server-class SSDs before you started to get enough heat to overwhelm the heatsink provided on most boards.
    Reply