Thermalright Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black review: Detachable 6.7-inch screen makes for unique possibilities

A big curved screen and good cooling performance, at a price that won't give you sticker shock

Thermalright Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Noise-normalized testing

Most testing is performed with the cooler tied to the default fan curve of our MSI x870E Carbon motherboard. But some of y’all prefer to see tests when the noise levels of coolers are equalized. This is especially important to those of you who prefer silent computers.

Thermalright Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

We’ll start with the “easiest” of these tests, which runs Cinebench R23 with a “stock” power limit. On my motherboard, this means the CPU will consume ~200W. The results here aren’t quite as impressive as we hoped, falling behind other 360mm AIOs.

The next test is a bit harder, with PBO enabled to allow the CPU to use as much power as can be handled – where it handled 237W, on average.

Thermalright Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

For our last test, we’ve added the heat of a GPU to the mix, which contributes 295W of added thermals into the PC case. This result is similar to our other noise-normalized tests, and isn’t very impressive. However, when tied to a typical fan curve, this AIO performs much better – as you’ll see in the last section.

Thermalright Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Noise levels

We’ve measured noise levels at two points to give you an idea of how the cooler operates when tied to a motherboard’s default fan curve. Our first measurement is when the fans are allowed to run at full speeds, the loudest noise levels possible.

Thermalright Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

In terms of maximum volume, Thermalright’s AIO reaches 47.2 dBA. This is louder than I would prefer, but seems to be about “middle of the road” in comparison to other high-performance liquid cooling systems these days.

Our next acoustic measurement is the cooler’s volume when the CPU consumes 150W. This might be similar to your “worst case” gaming scenarios, especially if PBO is enabled. Noise levels are very good here, reaching only 38.9 dBA. This means the cooler runs quietly in most common use cases, and will only become noisy in high-intensity workloads.

Thermalright Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

PBO Performance – full fan speeds

While some of you prefer to run coolers at low noise levels, I know many just want to see maximum performance. This test lets the fans run at their full speeds, show the full potential of the AIO’s cooling potential. Turning on PBO allows AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X to stretch its legs and guzzle power, pushing the limits of any CPU cooler on the market.

The Wonder Vision 360 UB cooled 255W in this test, only 3W behind the best results we’ve had from a 360mm AIO thus far.

Thermalright Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

200W thermal benchmarks and noise levels

For the next thermal test, I leave motherboard settings at their defaults, which results in a power limit of 200W when running Cinebench R23. CPU temperatures here averaged 74.7C, which is rather impressive when you consider that our best result – with Arctic’s Liquid Freezer III Pro 420 – was only 1.1C cooler!

Thermalright Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

150W thermal benchmarks and noise levels

For the next thermal test, I’ve set the power limit to 150W.

Thermalright Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

In this lower-intensity scenario, the Wonder Vision 360 UB showed off, delivering the best temperatures we’ve seen on this AMD Ryzen 9 9950X system, reaching an average of only 59.1 degrees Celsius.

100W thermal results

Our next test is the least-difficult featured in our cooling reviews, with a workload consuming only 100W. In this lower-intensity scenario, Thermalright’s Wonder Vision 360 UB again had the best results of the 360mm AIOs we’ve tested on this system, with a temperature averaging a ‘chilly’ 47.6 degrees C.

Thermalright Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Conclusion

Thermalright Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

With the Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black, Thermalright has shown that the company isn’t just an effective competitor for budget cooling – it’s also fully capable of producing high-end, premium products.

This AIO’s price of $205.90 might seem steep at first, until you consider that curved-screen competitors from Tryx and others often have prices closer to $300 or more. The included 6.7-inch ultrawide display is gorgeous, and features hundreds of visual theme options, courteously of Thermalright’s TRCC software. And the ability to use the screen independently of the cooler might appeal to those wanting to customize their PC cases in unique ways.

Thermalright Wonder Vision 360 UB ARGB Black

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Albert Thomas
Freelancer, CPU Cooling Reviewer

Albert Thomas is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering CPU cooling reviews.

  • Kindaian
    I'm sorry but i fail to see how a screen is going to improve the thermal features of the system. Likewise for the useless RBG lights all over the computer as it is usual nowadays. Do they improve the performance of the computer at all?

    Show me the numbers that prove that it does!
    Reply
  • Shiznizzle
    How long before you can game on those?
    Reply
  • UnforcedERROR
    Kindaian said:
    I'm sorry but i fail to see how a screen is going to improve the thermal features of the system. Likewise for the useless RBG lights all over the computer as it is usual nowadays. Do they improve the performance of the computer at all?

    Show me the numbers that prove that it does!
    I don't understand your issue. No one claims the RGB lighting and screen improve the performance. They're purely for aesthetics. If it's not your thing that's completely reasonable, but don't make the mistake of assuming everyone shares your opinion. Many consumers like these touches, particularly if the performance is also reasonable.

    If you want great performance with no frills, just get the non-RGB Arctic III Pro options. I really wish people would stop harping on RGB elements every single time they see them. You aren't the target audience, just accept it and move on.
    Reply
  • CCCOOORRRYYY
    I wish somebody would make an AIO with a radiator that uses copper/brass cores instead of aluminum, but still has a reservoir built in.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    I know fans have a low likelihood of failure, but three connected like this just bugs me from the compounded failure chance. It would really suck to have to buy 3 new fans, a new fan module or RMA the cooler if a fan failed. The fans look similar to the design used in the Phantom Spirit 120 EVO so it's a little disappointing to see the performance isn't better.

    Really appreciate seeing the GPU load tests as I think those are very useful from a practical standpoint (for the way most people mount AIOs). It speaks to how well the fans get hot air out of the case and how the AIO handles the extra heat.
    Reply