Part 2: 2D, Acceleration, And Windows: Aren't All Graphics Cards Equal?
Tom2D: Line Output
This test exercises line drawing functions in GDI. In Part 1 of this story, these tests produced the most dramatic and obvious differences among graphics cards. Please read the summary at the end of this test, because the problems described in our first exploration were also reproduced on more than 40 systems in our follow-up round, and in results posted later by our readers.
Test Content:
A total of about 150,000 lines of random length and color are drawn in random positions on-screen as this test runs. Because the seed value for the random number generator remains constant, all test runs should produce the same outputs as well. All objects will appear inside the drawing surface, so no clipping is needed.
GDI Functions Called
For the direct line drawing benchmark:
CreatePenMoveToExLineToSelectObjectDeleteObject
For drawing lines from the DIB buffer:
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
CreateCompatibleDCCreateDIBSectionCreateSolidBrushRectangleBitBlt
Summary:
Here's where we're able to re-confirm the results seen in Part 1, where ATI's Radeon HD 5000-series cards don't perform well.
Interestingly the measurements for output with Aero turned off increased when we opened a second window and maximized it (something like Mozilla Firefox, for example) before running this test, and then switched back to the test window. After that, a measurably higher value is produced on test machines in a completely reproducible fashion. A second test run after a brief period of time no longer shows this effect, however, and performance losses once again appear across the board.
Again, this is indicative of a driver issue, and we can only hope that the test driver we're working with currently addresses the issue. The rest of the test results speak for themselves. Once again, the Atom with a GMA 950 (and Aero enabled) generates surprisingly good results, and the low performance from the GeForce GTX 285 is equally noteworthy for direct output with Aero disabled. Anything that goes over 20,000 lines drawn probably won’t impact real-world usage scenarios.
There's a budget GeForce GPU selling in China that not even Nvidia knew it made — RTX 4010 turns out to be a modified RTX A400 workstation GPU
US to patch loopholes that allow China to buy banned AI GPUs from other countries — new regulations include national quotas on GPU exports and a global licensing system
-
mdm08 I have a 5850 with 10.1 drivers and it seems Photoshop CS4 doesn't recognize it as a graphics card that can improve performance so all those cool new features like animated zoom, kinetic panning, and such seem to be disabled. Also, it when you have a very complex group of objects and you try to nudge it ( move it one pixel with arrow keys) the computer actually shows the spinning wheel and has to process this instead of being instantaneous like it was on my older 7600GT. Is this an issue related with what this article is saying about apps written for GDI or is this a different issue i'm experiencing?Reply -
jrharbort Scores on 9600M GT and T9600 Core 2 Duo with Windows XP and latest graphics drivers. Only 11 active background processes no including benchmark, and themes disabled.Reply
BENCHMARK: DIRECT DRAWING TO VISIBLE DEVICE
Text: 8556 chars/sec
Line: 47513 lines/sec
Polygon: 7757 polygons/sec
Rectangle: 6564 rects/sec
Arc/Ellipse: 3874 ellipses/sec
Blitting: 13974 operations/sec
Stretching: 266 operations/sec
Splines/Bézier: 10510 splines/sec
Score: 984 -
It would be great if you can run the test on some "pro" cards (quadroFX, quadroNVS, firePro & fireMV). Just to see if the "pro" drivers change standard UI rendering or the optimizations are only for the professional DCC software.Reply
-
liquidsnake718 mdm08I have a 5850 with 10.1 drivers and it seems Photoshop CS4 doesn't recognize it as a graphics card that can improve performance so all those cool new features like animated zoom, kinetic panning, and such seem to be disabled. Also, it when you have a very complex group of objects and you try to nudge it ( move it one pixel with arrow keys) the computer actually shows the spinning wheel and has to process this instead of being instantaneous like it was on my older 7600GT. Is this an issue related with what this article is saying about apps written for GDI or is this a different issue i'm experiencing?Oh great, more news on a 5xxx series not being able to handle simple apps like CS4.... I have yet to use CS4 on my desktop with my 5850..... I hope Ati comes out with more patches if this is a problem.Reply -
taltamir windows XP is dead... get on the windows 7 64bit bandwagon already you Luddites! (not referring to the authors of the article, they raise good points; I am referring to those customers who insist that XP is some sort of holy grail of windows bliss never seen before or after)Reply -
Scores on P4 2.8 HT Northwood W ati 2600 pro drivers 10.1 aero Win 7 :Reply
BENCHMARK: DIRECT DRAWING TO VISIBLE DEVICE
Text: 8106 chars/sec
Line: 6528 lines/sec
Polygon: 249 polygons/sec
Rectangle: 1484 rects/sec
Arc/Ellipse: 6127 ellipses/sec
Blitting: 379 operations/sec
Stretching: 80 operations/sec
Splines/Bézier: 5263 splines/sec
Score: 362 -
Scores on P4 2.8 HT Northwood W ati 2600 pro drivers 10.1 aero Win 7 :Reply
BENCHMARK: DIB-BUFFER AND BLIT
Text: 12633 chars/sec
Line: 21067 lines/sec
Polygon: 4087 polygons/sec
Rectangle: 535 rects/sec
Arc/Ellipse: 5604 ellipses/sec
Blitting: 1443 operations/sec
Stretching: 213 operations/sec
Splines/Bézier: 12213 splines/sec
Score: 607 -
giovanni86 BENCHMARK: DIRECT DRAWING TO VISIBLE DEVICEReply
Text: 54466 chars/sec
Line: 73135 lines/sec
Polygon: 23943 polygons/sec
Rectangle: 3927 rects/sec
Arc/Ellipse: 26911 ellipses/sec
Blitting: 9827 operations/sec
Stretching: 464 operations/sec
Splines/Bézier: 41911 splines/sec
Score: 2600 -
helle040 Rdaeon 4670, amd 7750be, winxp, drivers 10.1, resolutie 1280x1024, 32bitReply
Text: 45746
line: 40508
Splines/beziers: 20466
Poygon: 322
Rectangle: 1954
Arc/E.: 3494
Biting: 2406
Stretching: 211
Score: 1150 -
wxj I’ve always preferred GDI operations over those of the NOD. GDI have more basic operations set verses NOD’s more complex and sometimes unreliable operations.Reply