Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Benchmark Results
Our standard benchmarks and power tests are performed using the CPU’s stock frequencies (including any default boost/turbo), with all power-saving features enabled. We set optimized defaults in the BIOS and the memory by enabling the XMP profile. For this baseline testing, the Windows power scheme is set to Balanced (default) so the PC idles appropriately.
Synthetic Benchmarks
Synthetics provide a great way to determine how a board runs, as identical settings should produce similar performance results. Turbo boost wattage and advanced memory timings are places where motherboard makers can still optimize for either stability or performance, though, and those settings can impact some testing.
Results from this set of benchmarks show our ProArt board as average to slightly above average across several tests. It did well in the Procyon Office and Photo and Video editing tests. The latter is good for creators. That said, you wouldn’t be able to pick it out of a crowd as too slow or too fast. As usual, performance differences between most boards are quite minimal.
Timed Applications
In the timed applications, the ProArt did well in the LAME test, anding in second place, and was average in the Corona 1.4 benchmark for ray tracing. Handbrake results also hovered right around average. So far, it’s a performant board across various applications.
3D Games and 3DMark
Starting with the launch of Ryzen 7000, we’ve updated one of our games, F1 21, to the latest version, F1 22. We're keeping Far Cry 6. We run the games at 1920 x 1080 resolution using the Ultra preset (details listed above). As the resolution goes up, the CPU tends to have less impact. The goal with these settings is to determine if there are differences in performance at the most commonly used (and CPU/system bound) resolution with settings most people use or strive for (Ultra). We expect the difference between boards in these tests to be minor, with most differences falling within the margin of error. We’ve also added a minimum FPS value, affecting your gameplay and immersion experience.
Our gaming tests showed that although the ProArt is designed for creators, it was a competent gaming machine out of the box as well. In short, there’s nothing to worry about performance-wise as Asus has the BIOS tuned well, as they should at this point in the life cycle.
Power Consumption / VRM Temperatures
We used AIDA64’s System Stability Test with Stress CPU, FPU, Cache and Memory enabled for power testing, using the peak power consumption value. The wattage reading is from the wall via a Kill-A-Watt meter to capture the entire PC (minus the monitor). The only variable that changes is the motherboard; all other parts remain the same.
Power consumption for the Asus was average among our tested boards. It idled around 81W, with a peak of 274W. This averages out to 178W, which is almost exactly the average among our tested boards.
During our testing, VRM temperatures on the ProArt Creator reached around 50 degrees Celsius at stock and nearly 60 degrees Celsius when overclocked. While warmer than some other boards, the power delivery was easily kept within specification. The board will not get in the way of overclocking adventures, even using our high-power Ryzen 9 7950X processor.
Overclocking
Over the last few CPU generations, overclocking headroom has been shrinking (at least on the AMD side) while the out-of-box potential has increased. For overclockers, this means there’s less fun to have. For the average consumer, it means you’re getting the most out of the processor without manual tweaking. Our goal in this section is to increase the load on the VRMs and see if they can handle the additional stress. Overclocking AMD CPUs can be done in several ways (all-core or adjust PBO values). But for simplicity’s sake, we just went with an all-core overclock of 5.4 GHz with 1.30V to increase the power output.
Since our approach is to add power through all cores, we simply raised the CPU multiplier to 54x, manually set the voltage to 1.30V, and adjusted LLC to minimize vdroop. On the memory side, AMD states the sweet spot is around DDR5-6000, so we used the Kingston Fury kit, set the AMD EXPO profile and checked for stability.
After setting the CPU multiplier, Vcore and adjusting LLC to mitigate vdroop (minimal in the first place), off we went onto a stable, overclocked system throughout our stress test.
On the memory side, we had a bit of work to do. First, our GSkill kit that we’ve used on AMD boards since launch doesn’t work on this board. For base/performance testing, we used the Kingston Fury Beast DDR5-6000 kit with manually adjusted speed and primary timings to gather the data. The kit isn’t on the QVL list, so that’s not surprising. But still, this is the first board they won’t work with our main ki out of the box.
That out of the way, we set the Kingston Fury Beast DDR5-6000 kit, enabled EXPO, and things were stable. Just be sure to get a kit off the approved list if you want to ensure compatibility. That’s good advice for any board, really.
Bottom Line
If you’re a creator looking to get the latest and greatest connectivity for your workflows out of a motherboard, the Asus ProArt X670E-Creator Wi-Fi is THE option in the upper-midrange space. Priced just under $450, It’s one of the least-expensive optionis with USB 4 (40 Gbps) support and the DisplayPort input. There’s also plenty of fast storage, with two PCIe 5.0 x4 (128 Gbps) sockets and two others running at PCIe 4.0 x4. There’s plenty of USB connectivity on the rear IO and front panel options to connect your peripherals. The board is also one of – if not the – least expensive Ryzen 7000 board with a native 10 GbE port for even snappier transfers over a LAN.
That said, it’s not all fairy tales and unicorns. If your storage consists of more than four SATA devices, you must add an expansion card to the bottom PCIe slot or look elsewhere. There is a level of simple elegance to the black-on-gold aesthetic. However, those who want a centerpiece to show off in their build will need to add RGBs or other bling to stand out.
As far as competition, anything designed for creators seems to be on the less expensive side (ASRock X670E Pro RS at $280, for example) and doesn’t add too much in the way of helpful hardware (such as USB 4, DP passthrough functionality, and 10 GbE). But you won’t find that on any board for that price either. If you compare at this board’s price point, things get a bit more interesting. ASRock’s X670E Taichi ($499.99) is the closest competitor hardware-wise, missing only the 10 GbE. MSI’s X670E Carbon WI-Fi ($479.99) is also in the ballpark but missing native USB 4 and 10 GbE.
Ultimately, if you’re a creator (or any type of user) requiring many USB ports, the fastest ethernet available, and USB 4 with video pass-through, the ProArt X670E-Creator Wi-Fi is one of the only options under $500. The rest are flagship-class motherboards that fetch a significant premium. Less expensive options are available, but you’ll sacrifice quite a bit in terms of features. While it isn’t the best-looking motherboard at the price point, the ProArt X670E-Creator does offer a wide-ranging feature set that creatives can utilize, at a fair price.
MORE: Best Motherboards
MORE: How To Choose A Motherboard
MORE: All Motherboard Content
Joe Shields is a Freelance writer for Tom’s Hardware US. He reviews motherboards.
Intel might be too big to fail — Washington policymakers are already discussing potential solutions if the chipmaker cannot recover
Apple's M4 Max is the single-core performance king in Geekbench 6 — M4 Max beats the Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen 9 9950X
Make spruces up Agetec arcade stick with two Raspberry Pi Picos
-
evdjj3j If anyone else is wondering what DP input is for here is a discussion in the forum.Reply
https://forums.tomshardware.com/threads/what-is-displayport-input-for.3737542/#post-22534507 -
TJ Hooker It kind of looks like this motherboard may support ECC memory (ECC UDIMMs, not just the standard DDR5 on-die ECC), is there any chance you could test that?Reply
Edit: According to the BIOS manual, there is a BIOS setting to enable/disable ECC: Advanced > AMD CBS > ECC
I'm not seeing anything like that in your BIOS screenshots though. -
atomicWAR Anything with less than 6 SATA ports is a hard pass for me. This is excatly why my wife and I both went with Asrock x670E Taichi based platforms with 8 SATA ports of which I am actively using seven, six connected to 20TB drives with room for one more (mixed drives her as well but all ports) and one running my case's external 3.5 HDD SATA test bay which I use regularly enough as well. I even have my HD DVD/Blu-ray player combo drive connected via an USB to sata adapter to free up SATA ports for drives. More SATA is always better for creators.Reply -
Amdlova
Nah... you need five nvme drivers on the board... sata is something from the past! (Joke mod).atomicWAR said:Anything with less than 6 SATA ports is a hard pass for me. This is excatly why my wife and I both went with Asrock x670E Taichi based platforms with 8 SATA ports of which I am actively using seven, six connected to 20TB drives with room for one more (mixed drives her as well but all ports) and one running my case's external 3.5 HDD SATA test bay which I use regularly enough as well. I even have my HD DVD/Blu-ray player combo drive connected via an USB to sata adapter to free up SATA ports for drives. More SATA is always better for creators.
I agree with you if I have a ton of storage sata ports is a must! Six is the bare miminum.
My board today has four slots need to disconnect to test the hard drives from my costumers... it's a pain! -
lunar.holiday
That's a bit of an outdated use case, and the board design reflects that. Its intention is the use of a NAS (hence the 10GbE port) for mass storage, with very fast SSDs as working drives. If you're still going with all internal drives, then this may not be the best option unless you add sata expansions. In my case, I run a raid 5 nas with four nvme drives. The photo/video editing take place on the ssds, then get offloaded to enterprise nas drives for archival. It's a pretty common workflow now with certain advantages of bulk internal storage, and the board is great for that.atomicWAR said:Anything with less than 6 SATA ports is a hard pass for me. This is excatly why my wife and I both went with Asrock x670E Taichi based platforms with 8 SATA ports of which I am actively using seven, six connected to 20TB drives with room for one more (mixed drives her as well but all ports) and one running my case's external 3.5 HDD SATA test bay which I use regularly enough as well. I even have my HD DVD/Blu-ray player combo drive connected via an USB to sata adapter to free up SATA ports for drives. More SATA is always better for creators.
Also the other boards missing "only" the 10 gigabit ethernet is a bit bigger deal than they're implying, since just a 10 GbE expansion card will run anywhere from $50-100 for a good one. -
atomicWAR lunar.holiday said:That's a bit of an outdated use case, and the board design reflects that. Its intention is the use of a NAS (hence the 10GbE port) for mass storage, with very fast SSDs as working drives. If you're still going with all internal drives, then this may not be the best option unless you add sata expansions. In my case, I run a raid 5 nas with four nvme drives. The photo/video editing take place on the ssds, then get offloaded to enterprise nas drives for archival. It's a pretty common workflow now with certain advantages of bulk internal storage, and the board is great for that.
Also the other boards missing "only" the 10 gigabit ethernet is a bit bigger deal than they're implying, since just a 10 GbE expansion card will run anywhere from $50-100 for a good one.
1st I am old so lol on the outdatedness. 2nd not a huge fan of most purpose built NASes. Had several in the past but prefer PCs built to double as a NAS. Especially since I already run 2 desktops (mine and the wife's)
Thus I use 2 pc's, one as my NAS other as back up...AND I have external enclosure for cold/off site storage I can leave at the inlaw's when not actively using it. Also run 12TB of nvme for active work flow and about to make it 16TB next month. -
o0OHypnoticO0o
Overclocking on AMD is more nuanced than this article takes the time to explore. Just dumping voltage into the CPU is a little archaic. On this platform, fighting thermals is the majority of the fight, so you'll see most overclockers working with undervolting as opposed to just using more power.Admin said:Designed with creators in mind, the Asus ProArt X670E-Creator ($449.99) has an elegant appearance, along with high-end hardware including 10 GbE LAN, USB 4 (40 Gbps) DisplayPort support with DisplayPort input, and dual PCIe 5.0 x4 M.2 sockets.
Asus ProArt X670E-Creator Wi-Fi Review: Creator Connectivity : Read more