Destiny 2 Performance Review
CPU, RAM & VRAM Resources
Processor Utilization
Whether we're running a Radeon or GeForce at 1080p or 1440p, the Ryzen 5's six cores idly twiddle their thumbs!
Overall CPU usage never rises above 50%, and spends most of its time below 40%. The Radeon appears to utilize fewer host processing resources than the GeForce card, though the delta narrows somewhat at 2560x1440.
System Memory Utilization
Two observations become apparent here: GeForce cards require more system memory than the Radeons, and a higher resolution translates to a slight increase in RAM utilization.
Video Memory Utilization
When it comes to graphics memory, on the other hand, the opposite is true. AMD's Radeon cards use a little extra GDDR5 than the GeForce cards at identical quality settings. We're still a long way from the 8GB and 6GB found on our test subjects, though.
Of course, it is no surprise that the transition from 1080p to 1440p leads to an increase in the amount of VRAM used.
MORE: DiRT 4 Performance Review
MORE: Prey Performance Review
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
MORE: Mass Effect Andromeda Performance Review
MORE: Ghost Recon Wildlands Performance Review
Current page: CPU, RAM & VRAM Resources
Prev Page Benchmarks: FPS, Frame Time & Smoothness Next Page Conclusion-
NinjaNerd56 I’m running a GTX960 on High, and never get below 40-50fps in D2. Most of the time, I’m exceeding 100.Reply
I have 32GB of RAM, and have my whole house on a realtime SNMP/WMI monitor.
D2 uses 10-12GB of RAM and drives the 4 cores in my I5 at 40-50% CPU.
Looks awesome.... -
SumTingW0ng Do you recommend this game? Should I get one?Reply
My setup is i7 4790k @ 4.5Ghz, 32GB DDR3 RAM, and ASUS Strix GTX 970. -
firerod1 My evga 1060 3gb sc doesn't keep stable 60 fps on mixed medium/high settings and I have an i5-2500 that runs around 75-85% utilization with 6.5gb of RAM out of my 8 being used, Its been annoying.... to say the least. Probably going to upgrade to zen+ or i5-8600 h370 when it comes out.Reply -
AnimeMania Will clearing out 68 Gig of SSD space to run the game provide any benefit or should it be run off the hard drive.Reply
-
clonazepam Disabling Depth of Field can give you back 10-20 fps average. I don't miss the effect in a first person shooter. I run it off of a normal hard drive. Once I figured out my normal overclock settings on the GPU just weren't going to work (I'm down to just +100 on both core and mem), it runs like a dream.Reply
The gunplay is just top notch. For normal play, you can 100% rely on the weapons, and add in the various abilities as you go. They aren't essential until you're in the harder modes and really looking to maximize teamwork and efficiency. It's a great game. -
nick sottiaux
Loading times are significantly improved while on my SSD. Running a 6700 paired with 16gb and a 1060. Takes from 20-25 seconds to load a map on SSD and close to a minute on my SSHD.20411987 said:Will clearing out 68 Gig of SSD space to run the game provide any benefit or should it be run off the hard drive.
Hope that helps
-
lordsabathaan Why the hell did you use so old drivers for Nvidia since 388.31 give up to 53% performance increase in Destiny 2? And you update with trying new amd drivers , but you even dont use up to date drivers from Nvidia..Reply -
cpt.pants These benchmarks are way off. I run a Ryzen 1700x and a RX 480 8gb. On 1080p with highest settings I average well above 100fps while playing solo and see a low of 80 fps during Public events or raids/crucible. Either toms is using bad drivers on amd hardware or they are just bias as usual towards nvidia.Reply -
Yannick_G_THFR 20414974 said:Why the hell did you use so old drivers for Nvidia since 388.31 give up to 53% performance increase in Destiny 2? And you update with trying new amd drivers , but you even dont use up to date drivers from Nvidia..
388.00 was the last public version when all the benchs were done.
20415809 said:These benchmarks are way off. I run a Ryzen 1700x and a RX 480 8gb. On 1080p with highest settings I average well above 100fps while playing solo and see a low of 80 fps during Public events or raids/crucible. Either toms is using bad drivers on amd hardware or they are just bias as usual towards nvidia.
We always try to find some demanding areas for the benchmark sequence. Of course (and like you), our RX480 show better results - like all the others GPUs, so the final ranking doesn't change globally - in some places :)