Nvidia GeForce GTX 960: Maxwell In The Middle
Partner Card Launch Round-Up
Asus GTX 960 Strix DirectCU II OC
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
EVGA GTX 960 SuperSC ACX 2.0
Gainward GTX 960 Phantom OC
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
Galax/KFA² GTX 960 EX OC
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
Gigabyte GTX 960 Gaming G1
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
Note: The new BIOS 86.06.0D.00.76, which was used for all benchmarks in this review, isn't present on the first batch of Gigabyte's graphics cards. It can be downloaded from the company's webpage after the launch.
Gigabyte GTX 960 WindForce OC
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
inno3D GTX 960 iChill
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
Palit GTX 960 Super JetStream
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
Zotac GTX 960 AMP! Edition
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Partner Card Launch Round-Up
Prev Page Filling the $200 Maxwell Gap Next Page Test System And BenchmarksDon Woligroski was a former senior hardware editor for Tom's Hardware. He has covered a wide range of PC hardware topics, including CPUs, GPUs, system building, and emerging technologies.
-
Novuake This seems meh... Impressive but not phenomenal power consumption to performance numbers. Especially compared the GTX970/980.Reply
Would have liked to see two more things.
1. More extensive AA. post processing and memory bandwidth testing. Pretty sure Nvidia hamstrung the card a bit in some scenarios with a 1280bit interface. I had to read it 4 times before I believed it and still am skeptical.
2. Overclocking benchies.
So otherwise I guess we are back to the "old" ti-designation setup where the GTX960ti SHOULD be based on GM206 and vanilla GTX960 is not. -
sconzen I may be blind, but I don't see the Zotax Amp! edition in the temperature and noise tests. Confirm?Reply -
damric The R9 280 is the fast and cheap elephant in the room that was never mentioned in this review,Reply -
Grognak Well, I'm not saying a 10% improvement on top of a reduced power consumption isn't nice, because it really is, however we're still quite far away from the 770. I suppose Nvidia has a card planned to fill the massive performance gap between the 960 and 970, one at 4Gb of VRAM maybe?Reply -
sconzen I may be blind, but I don't see the Zotax Amp! edition in the temperature and noise tests. Confirm?Reply -
Novuake Reply15117694 said:The damn arrows are STILL blocking the charts!
I am not the only one! Thank you! -
ykki Novoake, I am very sorry but I stole your comment from an earlier review.Reply
But seriously, those arrows can block out the sun if tom's put 'em right.