PNY RTX 4070 Review: Single 8-Pin, No 16-Pin 12VHPWR

Reference clocks, slightly less than reference performance

By Jarred Walton
published
PNY RTX 4070 card photos and unboxing
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

We have 1080p, 1440p, and 4K ultra benchmarks for this PNY review. Because it has a $599 MSRP, we feel that starting with 1440p ultra is most appropriate. We'll cover the 1080p results next, and finish with 4K gaming results (which are mostly academic, as you'd need DLSS to get good performance in many games at 4K ultra).

Here's the overview, first with the 15-game full suite, and then with separate rasterization-only and DXR-only (i.e. ray tracing) charts. We'll discuss the individual results further down the page.

Image 1 of 3
PNY RTX 4070 1440p performance charts
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

There's very little to add to the RTX 4070 story when looking at the PNY card. It's effectively tied with the reference RTX 4070 Founders Edition, with all the results being within the expected margin of error.

Against other GPUs, the RTX 4070 and RX 6950 XT trade blows, with the 4070 leading in ray tracing games and mostly trailing in rasterization performance (Total War: Warhammer III being the sole exception on the latter). DLSS upscaling will generally favor Nvidia's new card, because it's both more widely available and it looks better, with Frame Generation being the potential smooth (as in, frame smoothing) cherry on top.

Image 1 of 15
PNY RTX 4070 1440p performance charts
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Across our 15-game test suite, the PNY and Founders Edition 4070 cards are within 2% of each other in every test. We'll need to look to other aspects to find some differentiating factors.

One interesting point is just how much the gap has grown between the various Nvidia GPUs this generation. The 4070 ends up being 33% faster than the 4060 Ti, while the 4070 Ti in turn delivers 24% higher performance. Compared to the previous generation, the RTX 3070 was only about 12% faster than the RTX 3060 Ti, while the RTX 3070 Ti tacked on just 7% more performance than the 3070.

That mostly applies to other 30-series versus 40-series comparisons as well, though the 4080 and 4070 Ti at least are about the same 20~25 percent difference as the previous generation. We'll have to see where the upcoming RTX 4060 and, eventually, RTX 4050 land. The 3060 Ti was 34% faster than the vanilla 3060, despite having less VRAM. On paper at least, the 4060 Ti has 46% more compute than the 4060.

Jarred Walton
Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

7 Comments Comment from the forums
  • Yet another disappointing card, in a series filled with overpriced mediocrities - 4090 being the only exception.
    Reply
  • atomicWAR
    Great write up. I expected worse performance from the rumors floating around the web that single 8 pin cards were less performant. Yes its average clocks were a hair less at 2738 vs 2745 but that can be down to the silicon lottery at that point. Still not thrilled with the price with the alloted vram but all in all I am pleasantly surprised the card performs as well as it does.
    valthuer said:
    Yet another disappointing card, in a series filled with overpriced mediocrities - 4090 being the only exception.
    Yes and no...price and vram yes but as stated performance is decent compared to the 12vhpwr cards. But your not wrong the 4090 is the only real exception this gen. 60 percent performance for a 6% mark up. Seems fair to me...the rest of the stack not so much.
    Reply
  • atomicWAR said:
    Yes and no...price and vram yes but as stated performance is decent compared to the 12vhpwr cards.
    Unfortunately, decent performance means little to nothing, when it comes down to just 12 GBs of RAM.

    That's just not a decent amount for today's standards.

    Trust me, i've owned a 4070 Ti for approximately 5 months and had the opportunity to run some extensive tests. Bottom line, i expected more.

    At 4K max settings, it gets kicked out of games like Far Cry 6 (released on 2021) and Resident Evil 4 (remake), due to insufficient memory.

    If that's the kind of performance we get from a Ti, i don't expect a 4070 to be any better.

    Also a factor: is it gonna be any good for the games that will be released in these next few months? I don't think so.
    Reply
  • atomicWAR
    valthuer said:
    Unfortunately, decent performance means little to nothing, when it comes down to just 12 GBs of RAM.

    That's just not a decent amount for today's standards.

    Trust me, i've owned a 4070 Ti for approximately 5 months and had the opportunity to run some extensive tests. Bottom line, i expected more.

    At 4K max settings, it gets kicked out of games like Far Cry 6 (released on 2021) and Resident Evil 4 (remake), due to insufficient memory.

    If that's the kind of performance we get from a Ti, i don't expect a 4070 to be any better.

    Also a factor: is it gonna be any good for the games that will be released in these next few months? I don't think so.
    Agreed. Vram needs a boost.
    Reply
  • mrv_co
    I gave up on waiting for a 7700 XT and picked one of these up since it fit nicely in my SFF case without any modification or additional expenditures. It’s a solid step up over my 5700 XT for 1440p gaming. No complaints so far.
    Reply
  • Ricky Zeng
    mrv_co said:
    I gave up on waiting for a 7700 XT and picked one of these up since it fit nicely in my SFF case without any modification or additional expenditures. It’s a solid step up over my 5700 XT for 1440p gaming. No complaints so far.
    I'm in a very similar position. I got a 6600XT after traded-in my RX580 during the peak of pandemic / mining craze. Now waiting for a 7700/7800 as upgrade but the PNY 4070 dual fan version is really tempting, as it's one of very few that fits my A4 SFF case yet delivers good performance gains.

    I reckon tech product (CPU/GPU, or any kind of prime movers) advancement comes in from two aspects: raw power, and efficiency. If we got improvement from both that's real lucky and not happening all the time. But I'm content as long as we got improvement from at least either one. Similar performance as 6800XT with way less power draw and smaller form factor? Count me in.
    Reply
  • Karo96
    valthuer said:
    Unfortunately, decent performance means little to nothing, when it comes down to just 12 GBs of RAM.

    That's just not a decent amount for today's standards.

    Trust me, i've owned a 4070 Ti for approximately 5 months and had the opportunity to run some extensive tests. Bottom line, i expected more.

    At 4K max settings, it gets kicked out of games like Far Cry 6 (released on 2021) and Resident Evil 4 (remake), due to insufficient memory.

    If that's the kind of performance we get from a Ti, i don't expect a 4070 to be any better.

    Also a factor: is it gonna be any good for the games that will be released in these next few months? I don't think so.
    But it's not a 4K card.
    We can agree on that it should offer more Vram for future proofing. And the price is a little to steep. But a card that draws less than 200 Watts on a 1440p system is very welcome.
    Reply