Page 2:Image Quality Settings
Page 3:Image Quality: Radeon Versus GeForce
Page 4:Test System And Benchmark Settings
Page 5:Benchmark Results: Low Detail
Page 6:Benchmark Results: Medium Detail
Page 7:Benchmark Results: High Detail
Page 8:Benchmark Results: High Detail With 4x Anti-Aliasing
Page 9:CPU Benchmarks: Clock Speeds And Cores
Image Quality: Radeon Versus GeForce
We scrutinized both GeForce and Radeon screen captures and came to the following conclusion: the image quality is close between the two competitors, but the Nvidia drivers and hardware generate darker shadows than their ATI counterparts, which is a difference we also observed in our Burnout Paradise analysis.
Which is better? That's certainly subjective. And to be honest, we didn't notice the difference until we directly compared screenshots. After we realized the difference, we noticed that the Nvidia cards would give us nice depth when the sun was in a position to provide good shadows. Alternatively, when we were deep within the cityscape and under the shadows of buildings, the Nvidia cards delivered a darker city with less contrast and definition compared to the Radeon cards.
However, neither of these issues is a game-changer. And as we said above, we never really noticed them until we directly compared the screenshots. We'd be happy to play the game on either camp's hardware from an image quality point of view.
But what about performance? To answer that question, let's move on to the benchmarks.
- Image Quality Settings
- Image Quality: Radeon Versus GeForce
- Test System And Benchmark Settings
- Benchmark Results: Low Detail
- Benchmark Results: Medium Detail
- Benchmark Results: High Detail
- Benchmark Results: High Detail With 4x Anti-Aliasing
- CPU Benchmarks: Clock Speeds And Cores